This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/19/us/a-virtual-lineups-of-average-citizens-created-by-software.html

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Police Use Facial Recognition Tools With Little Oversight, Study Says Study Urges Tougher Oversight for Police Use of Facial Recognition
(about 3 hours later)
A new report by a think tank at Georgetown University is calling for greater oversight of the use of emerging facial-recognition software that makes the images of more than 117 million Americans — a disproportionate number of whom are black — searchable by law enforcement agencies across the nation. A new report by a think tank at Georgetown University calls for greater oversight for emerging facial recognition software that makes the images of more than 117 million Americans — a disproportionate number of whom are black — searchable by law enforcement agencies across the nation.
While the agencies, like the F.B.I., have historically created fingerprint and DNA databases primarily from criminal investigations, many of the photos cataloged are of law-abiding Americans, according to the report released on Tuesday. While the agencies, including the F.B.I., have historically created fingerprint and DNA databases primarily from criminal investigations, many of the photos scattered among agencies at all levels of government are of law-abiding Americans, according to the report released on Tuesday.
The report found that 16 states allow law enforcement officials to compare the faces of people suspected of criminal acts to photos on driver’s licenses and other forms of identification without a warrant, “creating a virtual lineup of their state residents,” the report said.The report found that 16 states allow law enforcement officials to compare the faces of people suspected of criminal acts to photos on driver’s licenses and other forms of identification without a warrant, “creating a virtual lineup of their state residents,” the report said.
“This is unprecedented and highly problematic,” said the report, by the Center on Privacy and Technology at Georgetown’s law school.“This is unprecedented and highly problematic,” said the report, by the Center on Privacy and Technology at Georgetown’s law school.
Facial recognition technology, long used overseas by the American military and intelligence agencies in Iraq and Afghanistan, is seen by local law enforcement as an invaluable tool for identifying criminals, but it has also raised concerns among privacy advocates.Facial recognition technology, long used overseas by the American military and intelligence agencies in Iraq and Afghanistan, is seen by local law enforcement as an invaluable tool for identifying criminals, but it has also raised concerns among privacy advocates.
Because African-Americans are disproportionately more likely to come into contact with, and be arrested by, law enforcement officials, the report said, their police photos will most likely be overrepresented in face-recognition databases. Because African-Americans are disproportionately more likely to come into contact with, and be arrested by, law enforcement officials, the report said, their police photos will most likely be overrepresented in facial recognition databases.
The authors of the report said the aim was not to stop the use of the software, which they acknowledged had been effective in investigations. Nor did they blame law enforcement officers, who they said “are simply using every tool available to protect the people that they are sworn to serve.” The authors of the report said the aim was not to stop the use of the software, which they acknowledged had been effective in investigations. Nor did they fault law enforcement officers, who they said “are simply using every tool available to protect the people that they are sworn to serve.”
Rather, they called for Congress and state legislatures to pass laws creating stricter regulations over the technology. Researchers found, for instance, that just one agency — the Ohio Bureau of Criminal Investigation — specifically prohibited using the software to track people engaging in political or religious speech. No state has a law regulating use of the software. Rather, they called for Congress and state legislatures to pass laws creating stricter regulations on the technology. Researchers found, for instance, that just one agency — the Ohio Bureau of Criminal Investigation — specifically prohibited using the software to track people engaging in political or religious speech. No state has a law regulating use of the software.
“There is a real risk that police face recognition will be used to stifle free speech,” the report said.“There is a real risk that police face recognition will be used to stifle free speech,” the report said.
The F.B.I. did not immediately respond to an email on Tuesday seeking comment.The F.B.I. did not immediately respond to an email on Tuesday seeking comment.
The report also found that systems relying on police photos have a greater effect on African-Americans since they are arrested at higher rates. But the software may be less accurate with pictures of black people, and there is no independent testing for racially biased error rates, the report said. The report found that systems relying on police photos have a greater effect on African-Americans since they are arrested at higher rates. But the software may be less accurate with pictures of black people, and there is no independent testing for racially biased errors, it said.
Among the steps the authors suggested taking:Among the steps the authors suggested taking:
■ Databases should rely on police photos, not driver’s licenses and photo ID’s.■ Databases should rely on police photos, not driver’s licenses and photo ID’s.
■ Law enforcement should occasionally eliminate innocent people from any search.■ Law enforcement should occasionally eliminate innocent people from any search.
■ Searches of driver’s license and identification photos should require a court order and be limited to serious crimes, with the exception of identity theft and fraud cases.■ Searches of driver’s license and identification photos should require a court order and be limited to serious crimes, with the exception of identity theft and fraud cases.
■ An explicit ban should be enacted on tracking people on the basis of their political or religious beliefs, or their race or ethnicity. ■ An explicit ban should be enacted against tracking people on the basis of political or religious beliefs, race or ethnicity.
The report raised concerns about the increasing use of facial-recognition software on live video, allowing the police to constantly scan the faces of people on surveillance cameras. Several large police departments have looked into or have begun using the technology, the report said. The report raised concerns about the increasing use of facial recognition software on live video, allowing the police to constantly scan faces on surveillance cameras. Several large police departments have looked into or have begun using the technology, the report said.
“If deployed pervasively on surveillance video or police-worn body cameras, real-time face recognition will redefine the nature of public spaces,” the report warned.“If deployed pervasively on surveillance video or police-worn body cameras, real-time face recognition will redefine the nature of public spaces,” the report warned.