This article is from the source 'independent' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/homelessness-reduction-bill-vote-passes-councils-mps-second-reading-a7385206.html

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
MPs back new law that forces councils to stop people becoming homeless MPs back new law that forces councils to stop people becoming homeless
(35 minutes later)
A plan to force councils to give more help to people at risk of becoming homeless before they lose their home has passed a key step towards becoming law. A plan to force councils to give more help to people at risk of becoming homeless before they lose their home has passed a key step towards becoming law. 
The Homelessness Reduction Bill, proposed by Conservative backbencher Bob Blackman, would require local authorities to help anyone 56 days away from homelessness secure accommodation. The Homelessness Reduction Bill, proposed by Conservative backbencher Bob Blackman, would require local authorities to help anyone 56 days away from homelessness secure accommodation. Currently the figure is 28 days.
The Private Members Bill passed its second reading on Friday without a vote because no MPs indicated that they would vote against it. The private member’s bill passed its second reading on Friday without a vote because no MPs indicated that they would vote against it.
Earlier this month the Government announced that it would back the private members’ bill, following some changes after consultations with councils. Earlier this month the Government announced it would back the private member’s bill following some changes after consultations with councils.
Though the Bill enjoyed cross-party support, MPs said the Government had to provide the resources to councils to ensure it would work as planned. Though the bill enjoyed cross-party support, MPs said the Government had to provide the resources to councils to ensure it would work as planned.
Labour’s shadow housing minister John Healey said: “If the Government is serious about this Bill and if ministers mean what they say about homelessness, then they must do two things – fund the costs of the extra duties in this Bill in full, and tackle the causes of the growing homelessness crisis in this country. Labour’s shadow housing minister John Healey said: “If the Government is serious about this bill and if ministers mean what they say about homelessness, then they must do two things – fund the costs of the extra duties in this Bill in full, and tackle the causes of the growing homelessness crisis in this country.
“Those will be the two tests that we on this side hold the Government hard to account.”“Those will be the two tests that we on this side hold the Government hard to account.”
Conservative MP Mark Prisk added that the Government had to “play its part” and provide “additional funding for many councils in order for them to fulfil [the new] commitment”.Conservative MP Mark Prisk added that the Government had to “play its part” and provide “additional funding for many councils in order for them to fulfil [the new] commitment”.
Some MPs spoke critically of the bill despite not voting against it, however. Labour centrist Mike Gapes said the proposed law was “wishful thinking” and “gesture politics” because it did not provide extra homes. Some MPs spoke critically of the bill despite not voting against it, however. Labour centrist Mike Gapes said the proposed law was wishful thinking and “gesture politics” because it did not provide extra homes.