This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/30/us/politics/hillary-clinton-emails-fbi-anthony-weiner.html

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
For Democrats, New Focus on Clinton Email Is ‘Like an 18-Wheeler Smacking Into Us’ Hillary Clinton Assails James Comey, Calling Email Decision ‘Deeply Troubling’
(about 1 hour later)
Leading Democrats and advisers to Hillary Clinton expressed deep concern on Saturday that the F.B.I.’s renewed attention and unanswered questions about emails relating to Mrs. Clinton would turn some voters against her, hurt party candidates in competitive House and Senate races, and complicate efforts to win over undecided Americans in the final days of the election. Hillary Clinton and her allies sprang onto a war footing on Saturday, opening a ferocious attack on the F.B.I.’s director a day after he disclosed that his agency was looking into a potential new batch of messages from her private email server.
Clinton campaign aides sprang onto a war footing, deciding that their best strategy was to launch a ferocious attack on James B. Comey, the F.B.I. director. They accused him of smearing Mrs. Clinton with innuendo and providing ammunition to the Republican nominee, Donald J. Trump, in a move that violated Justice Department rules and is unprecedented so late in a presidential race. “It is pretty strange to put something like that out with such little information right before an election,” Mrs. Clinton said at a rally in Daytona Beach, Fla. “In fact, it’s not just strange; it is unprecedented and it is deeply troubling.”
Leading Democrats and advisers to Mrs. Clinton expressed deep concern that the F.B.I.’s renewed attention to emails relating to the nominee would turn some voters against her, hurt party candidates in competitive House and Senate races, and complicate efforts to win over undecided Americans in the final days of the election.
So after stepping gingerly around the issue on Friday, calling on the F.B.I. director, James B. Comey, to release more specific information but not overtly criticizing him, her campaign waged a coordinated offensive on Saturday, accusing Mr. Comey of smearing Mrs. Clinton with innuendo late in the race and of violating Justice Department rules.
During an 8 a.m. conference call, aides decided to attack Mr. Comey’s unusual decision to publicly disclose the inquiry. They seized on reports on Saturday that the day before Mr. Comey alerted Congress, the Justice Department had strongly discouraged him from doing so and warned him that he would be breaking with a longstanding policy against disclosing details of continuing investigations.
Even before Mrs. Clinton spoke in Florida, her campaign chairman, John D. Podesta, and campaign manager, Robby Mook, criticized Mr. Comey for putting out incomplete information and breaking with Justice Department protocol.
“By providing selective information, he has allowed partisans to distort and exaggerate to inflict maximum political damage,” Mr. Podesta said during a campaign conference call with reporters. “Comey has not been forthcoming with the facts,” he added, describing the director’s letter to Congress on Friday as “long on innuendo” and calling on Mr. Comey to release more details about the inquiry.
“There’s no evidence of wrongdoing, no charge of wrongdoing,” Mr. Podesta said. “Even Director Comey said this may not be significant. If that’s all true, it’s hard to see how this amounts to anything.”
By midday, Mr. Comey, a Republican appointed by President Obama and confirmed nearly unanimously by the Senate, found himself in the cross hairs of a Clinton attack operation. He has not publicly commented on the investigation, other than with the letter saying that more emails were being examined. He also wrote an email to F.B.I. employees explaining that he felt he had to inform Congress even though the agency did not yet know “the significance of this newly discovered collection of emails.”
With Mrs. Clinton leading Mr. Trump in most polls by small margins, Clinton advisers were also emphatic that they would not be thrown off stride. They said they would not change any political strategy, television advertising or campaign travel plans simply to try to contain the potential damage of the new F.B.I. inquiry.With Mrs. Clinton leading Mr. Trump in most polls by small margins, Clinton advisers were also emphatic that they would not be thrown off stride. They said they would not change any political strategy, television advertising or campaign travel plans simply to try to contain the potential damage of the new F.B.I. inquiry.
For months, the F.B.I. had investigated whether Mrs. Clinton had broken any laws by using a private email server while she was secretary of state. This past summer, Mr. Comey said that Mrs. Clinton had been “extremely careless” by allowing sensitive information to be discussed outside secure government servers, but that the agency had concluded that Mrs. Clinton had not committed a crime. The investigation was closed.For months, the F.B.I. had investigated whether Mrs. Clinton had broken any laws by using a private email server while she was secretary of state. This past summer, Mr. Comey said that Mrs. Clinton had been “extremely careless” by allowing sensitive information to be discussed outside secure government servers, but that the agency had concluded that Mrs. Clinton had not committed a crime. The investigation was closed.
Last week, Mr. Comey notified Congress that the agency may have discovered emails relevant to the investigation that belonged to Mrs. Clinton’s top aide, Huma Abedin. The emails were discovered on the computer of Ms. Abedin’s estranged husband, Anthony D. Weiner, during a separate investigation into allegations that he had exchanged sexually explicit text messages with a teenager. But on Friday, Mr. Comey notified Congress that the agency had discovered emails, possibly relevant to the investigation, that belonged to Mrs. Clinton’s top aide, Huma Abedin. The emails were discovered on the computer of Ms. Abedin’s estranged husband, Anthony D. Weiner, during a separate investigation into allegations that he had exchanged sexually explicit text messages with a teenager.
According to several Clinton advisers, Mrs. Clinton told them overnight and on Saturday that she wanted the campaign to operate normally, not rashly, while pressuring Mr. Comey to dispel any possibility that her candidacy was under legal threat. But the Clinton team also had to deal with a newly emboldened Mr. Trump, who urged voters at a rally on Saturday to oppose Mrs. Clinton because of her “criminal action” that was “willful, deliberate, intentional and purposeful.”According to several Clinton advisers, Mrs. Clinton told them overnight and on Saturday that she wanted the campaign to operate normally, not rashly, while pressuring Mr. Comey to dispel any possibility that her candidacy was under legal threat. But the Clinton team also had to deal with a newly emboldened Mr. Trump, who urged voters at a rally on Saturday to oppose Mrs. Clinton because of her “criminal action” that was “willful, deliberate, intentional and purposeful.”
The paramount fear among Clinton advisers and Democratic officials is that an election that had become a referendum on Mr. Trump’s fitness for office, and that had increasingly seemed like Mrs. Clinton’s to lose, would now become just as much about her conduct. The paramount fear among Clinton advisers and Democratic officials was that an election that had become a referendum on Mr. Trump’s fitness for office, and that had increasingly seemed to be Mrs. Clinton’s to lose, would now become just as much about her conduct.
In phone calls, email chains and text messages on Saturday, Clinton aides and allies were by turns confident that the F.B.I. would find nothing to hurt Mrs. Clinton and concerned that the inquiry would nudge demoralized Republicans to show up to vote for down-ballot candidates — and perhaps even cast ballots, however reluctantly, for the battered Mr. Trump.In phone calls, email chains and text messages on Saturday, Clinton aides and allies were by turns confident that the F.B.I. would find nothing to hurt Mrs. Clinton and concerned that the inquiry would nudge demoralized Republicans to show up to vote for down-ballot candidates — and perhaps even cast ballots, however reluctantly, for the battered Mr. Trump.
“This is like an 18-wheeler smacking into us, and it just becomes a huge distraction at the worst possible time,” said Donna Brazile, the chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee and a close Clinton ally. “The campaign is trying to cut through the noise as best it can. We don’t want it to knock us off our game. But on the second-to-last weekend of the race, we find ourselves having to tell voters, ‘Keep your focus, keep your eyes on the prize.’” “This is like an eighteen-wheeler smacking into us, and it just becomes a huge distraction at the worst possible time,” said Donna Brazile, the chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee and a close Clinton ally. “The campaign is trying to cut through the noise as best it can. We don’t want it to knock us off our game. But on the second-to-last weekend of the race, we find ourselves having to tell voters, ‘Keep your focus; keep your eyes on the prize.’”
Clinton advisers seized on reports on Saturday that, the day before Mr. Comey alerted Congress, the Justice Department had strongly discouraged him from doing so and warned the director that he would be breaking with longstanding policy on disclosing details of continuing investigations, law enforcement officials said.
During an 8 a.m. conference call on Saturday, aides decided to go on the offensive over Mr. Comey’s unusual decision to publicly disclose the inquiry. Four hours later the Clinton campaign chairman, John Podesta, and campaign manager, Robby Mook, criticized Mr. Comey for putting out incomplete information and even innuendo about Ms. Abedin’s email and breaking with Justice Department protocol.
“By providing selective information, he has allowed partisans to distort and exaggerate to inflict maximum political damage,” Mr. Podesta said during a campaign conference call with reporters. “Comey has not been forthcoming with the facts,” he added, describing the director’s letter to Congress on Friday as “long on innuendo” and calling on Mr. Comey to release more details about the inquiry.
“There’s no evidence of wrongdoing, no charge of wrongdoing,” Mr. Podesta said. “Even Director Comey said this may not be significant. If that’s all true, it’s hard to see how this amounts to anything.”
Mr. Comey has not publicly commented on the investigation, other than the letter he sent to members of Congress on Friday telling them that more emails were being examined. He also wrote an email to F.B.I. employees explaining that he felt he had to inform Congress even though the agency did not yet know “the significance of this newly discovered collection of emails.”
Mr. Podesta, when asked if Ms. Abedin had shared information with the campaign about what might be in the newly discovered emails, said she had previously turned over all relevant emails relating to Mrs. Clinton as part of the F.B.I.’s earlier investigation of the former secretary of state’s handling of classified email material.Mr. Podesta, when asked if Ms. Abedin had shared information with the campaign about what might be in the newly discovered emails, said she had previously turned over all relevant emails relating to Mrs. Clinton as part of the F.B.I.’s earlier investigation of the former secretary of state’s handling of classified email material.
Mr. Podesta said there was “absolutely nothing that she’s done that calls into question anything.”Mr. Podesta said there was “absolutely nothing that she’s done that calls into question anything.”
“We of course stand by her,” he added, in response to a question about whether Ms. Abedin would step down from the campaign.“We of course stand by her,” he added, in response to a question about whether Ms. Abedin would step down from the campaign.
As much as Clinton advisers stressed that they were not panicking, some of them radiated anger at Mr. Comey, Mr. Weiner and even Mrs. Clinton herself — a reflection of 18 months of frustration that her personal decisions about her email practices and privacy were still generating unhelpful political drama at this stage of the race. Two Clinton aides, for example, pointedly noted in interviews that it was difficult to press a counterattack without fully knowing what was in Ms. Abedin’s emails. As much as Clinton advisers stressed that they were not panicking, some of them radiated anger at Mr. Comey, Mr. Weiner and even Mrs. Clinton — a reflection of 18 months of frustration that her personal decisions about her email practices and privacy were still generating unhelpful political drama at this stage of the race. Two Clinton aides, for example, pointedly noted in interviews that it was difficult to press a counterattack without fully knowing what was in Ms. Abedin’s emails.
In a conference call with campaign surrogates on Friday night, a rare gathering at the start of a weekend, Clinton advisers asked them to push a coordinated message in news media interviews and with voters: that the F.B.I. investigation had not been reopened; that none of the new emails had emerged from Mrs. Clinton; that the F.B.I. had to release more details about its inquiry; and that they were concerned that Mr. Comey had taken this action.In a conference call with campaign surrogates on Friday night, a rare gathering at the start of a weekend, Clinton advisers asked them to push a coordinated message in news media interviews and with voters: that the F.B.I. investigation had not been reopened; that none of the new emails had emerged from Mrs. Clinton; that the F.B.I. had to release more details about its inquiry; and that they were concerned that Mr. Comey had taken this action.
Encouraged by Mrs. Clinton’s senior aides to reframe the story and make it about Mr. Comey’s actions, liberal groups from the Congressional Black Caucus to Naral, the abortion-rights group, scrambled to press the F.B.I. director for more information. Encouraged by Mrs. Clinton’s senior aides to reframe the story and make it about Mr. Comey’s actions, liberal groups including the Congressional Black Caucus and Naral, an abortion rights group, scrambled to press the F.B.I. director for more information.
Mrs. Clinton’s advisers said she was still planning to campaign as scheduled in Florida on Saturday and Sunday, in Ohio on Monday, in Florida on Tuesday and in the Republican-leaning state of Arizona on Wednesday. Clinton aides said that by sticking to the Arizona plan, Mrs. Clinton was projecting confidence that she had not been rattled, and that the campaign was not reshuffling its plans because of the 11th-hour surprise from Mr. Comey. Mrs. Clinton’s advisers said she was still planning to campaign as scheduled in Florida on Saturday and Sunday, in Ohio on Monday, in Florida on Tuesday and in Republican-leaning Arizona on Wednesday. Clinton aides said that by sticking to the Arizona plan, Mrs. Clinton was projecting confidence that she had not been rattled and that the campaign was not reshuffling its plans because of the surprise from Mr. Comey.
While some voters are undecided, about 20 million Americans have already cast their ballots in early voting and millions more long ago concluded which candidate they would support. While some voters are undecided, about 20 million Americans have already cast ballots in early voting, and millions more long ago concluded which candidate they would support.
In a polarized country, where many are unwaveringly contemptuous of either Mr. Trump or Mrs. Clinton, the latest development in the email saga prompted a mix of shrugs and renewed determination from the left and told-you-so claims of Clinton perfidy from the right. In a polarized country, where many are unwaveringly contemptuous of either Mr. Trump or Mrs. Clinton, the latest development in the email story prompted a mix of shrugs and renewed determination from the left and told-you-so claims of Clinton perfidy from the right.
“My mind was made up,” said Luis Luaces, 57, a Florida Republican who expressed little surprise about the Weiner email twist as he cast his ballot for Mr. Trump in Miami on Saturday. “I know what the Clintons are about.” “My mind was made up,” said Luis Luaces, 57, a Florida Republican who expressed little surprise about the Weiner email twist as he cast his ballot for Mr. Trump on Saturday in Miami. “I know what the Clintons are about.”
Democrats also said the development had done little to alter their perceptions. In Charlotte, N.C., Ian Leemans, 35, a Democrat, said he had been at work checking news sites when he saw a flashing banner with Friday’s news. He had already planned to vote early for Mrs. Clinton, but after the news, he felt even more urgency to cast his ballot.Democrats also said the development had done little to alter their perceptions. In Charlotte, N.C., Ian Leemans, 35, a Democrat, said he had been at work checking news sites when he saw a flashing banner with Friday’s news. He had already planned to vote early for Mrs. Clinton, but after the news, he felt even more urgency to cast his ballot.
“I thought, O.K., this is going to be an advantage for Trump people to say, ‘Oh, it is a rigged election,’” Mr. Leemans said. “So I thought, ‘Oh, I need to make sure I get up at 8 o’clock on a Saturday and vote.’”“I thought, O.K., this is going to be an advantage for Trump people to say, ‘Oh, it is a rigged election,’” Mr. Leemans said. “So I thought, ‘Oh, I need to make sure I get up at 8 o’clock on a Saturday and vote.’”
Several Republican pollsters and strategists said the F.B.I. inquiry was more likely to help the party’s candidates for the House and Senate than to transform the political fortunes of Mr. Trump. Given his slide in national polls, they said, only a cataclysmic setback for Mrs. Clinton — like a federal indictment — would change the dynamics of the race.Several Republican pollsters and strategists said the F.B.I. inquiry was more likely to help the party’s candidates for the House and Senate than to transform the political fortunes of Mr. Trump. Given his slide in national polls, they said, only a cataclysmic setback for Mrs. Clinton — like a federal indictment — would change the dynamics of the race.
“To the extent this affects relative enthusiasm among Republicans and Democrats, it helps down-ballot Republicans,” said Whit Ayres, a pollster advising one such candidate seeking re-election, Senator Marco Rubio of Florida. Referring to Mrs. Clinton’s lead over Mr. Trump in recent polls, Mr. Ayres added, “The margin at the top of the ticket is large enough so that it probably takes an indictment, rather than an investigation, to move those numbers sufficiently.”“To the extent this affects relative enthusiasm among Republicans and Democrats, it helps down-ballot Republicans,” said Whit Ayres, a pollster advising one such candidate seeking re-election, Senator Marco Rubio of Florida. Referring to Mrs. Clinton’s lead over Mr. Trump in recent polls, Mr. Ayres added, “The margin at the top of the ticket is large enough so that it probably takes an indictment, rather than an investigation, to move those numbers sufficiently.”
With control of the Senate on a knife’s edge and Democrats wielding Mr. Trump’s unpopularity like a weapon to make gains in the House, Republicans were exultant to at least get off the defensive.With control of the Senate on a knife’s edge and Democrats wielding Mr. Trump’s unpopularity like a weapon to make gains in the House, Republicans were exultant to at least get off the defensive.
While few Republicans were willing to argue that Mr. Comey’s letter could revive Mr. Trump, they said that the new revelations dovetailed with a message they were already pushing: that Democratic candidates would only enable Mrs. Clintons’s instinct for secrecy and not hold her accountable.While few Republicans were willing to argue that Mr. Comey’s letter could revive Mr. Trump, they said that the new revelations dovetailed with a message they were already pushing: that Democratic candidates would only enable Mrs. Clintons’s instinct for secrecy and not hold her accountable.
“It boosts the check-and-balance argument because it is a reminder of all of the things voters hate about Clinton,” said Rob Simms, the executive director of the House Republican campaign arm.“It boosts the check-and-balance argument because it is a reminder of all of the things voters hate about Clinton,” said Rob Simms, the executive director of the House Republican campaign arm.