This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-37821764

The article has changed 9 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Judges reject 'joint enterprise' challenge Judges reject 'joint enterprise' challenge
(35 minutes later)
Judges have refused to overturn guilty verdicts in a "joint enterprise" challenge by men convicted of group attack murders.Judges have refused to overturn guilty verdicts in a "joint enterprise" challenge by men convicted of group attack murders.
The test cases were brought after the Supreme Court ruled in February the law had wrongly been interpreted for more than 30 years.The test cases were brought after the Supreme Court ruled in February the law had wrongly been interpreted for more than 30 years.
The challenges followed the decision that it was wrong to treat "foresight" as a sufficient test to convict a defendant under joint enterprise.The challenges followed the decision that it was wrong to treat "foresight" as a sufficient test to convict a defendant under joint enterprise.
It paved the way for the first appeals.It paved the way for the first appeals.
The decision to reject the cases was met with cries of protest by supporters of the men sitting in the public gallery at the Court of Appeal. The test cases involved 13 men convicted in six separate crimes.
'Whole evidence' The decision to reject their cases was met with cries of protest by supporters of the men sitting in the public gallery at the Court of Appeal.
There were shouts of "no justice, no peace" when Lord Chief Justice Lord Thomas made the judgement.
One case challenged the safety of the convictions of Tyler Burton and Nicholas Terrelonge, who were found guilty of murdering Ashley Latty in a group attack in Dagenham, east London in May 2014.
Rejecting the appeal, Lord Thomas said the Supreme Court judgement would "not have made a difference" to the jury's verdict in the trial and the convictions "were and are safe".
The joint enterprise law has been used to convict people in gang-related cases if defendants could have foreseen violent acts by their associates.The joint enterprise law has been used to convict people in gang-related cases if defendants could have foreseen violent acts by their associates.
In February the Supreme Court said that this was being misinterpreted and juries had to decide on the "whole evidence".In February the Supreme Court said that this was being misinterpreted and juries had to decide on the "whole evidence".
In his judgement, Lord Neuberger said the ruling did not automatically mean all previous joint enterprise convictions were unsafe. The ruling applies to England, Wales, Northern Ireland and most UK overseas common law territories but not in Scotland, which has its own rules on joint enterprise.
In his judgement, Lord Neuberger said the decision did not automatically mean all previous joint enterprise convictions were unsafe.
Campaigners said the change would make the law fairer, but some murder victims' relatives said they were worried about possible appeals.Campaigners said the change would make the law fairer, but some murder victims' relatives said they were worried about possible appeals.