This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2016/nov/14/ivf-clinics-misleading-couples-about-success-rate-accc-finds
The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| IVF clinics misleading couples about success rate, ACCC finds IVF clinics misleading couples about success rate, ACCC finds | |
| (25 days later) | |
| Several major IVF clinics in Australia have been misleading couples about their success rate, an investigation by the Australian consumer watchdog has found. | Several major IVF clinics in Australia have been misleading couples about their success rate, an investigation by the Australian consumer watchdog has found. |
| Earlier this year the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission launched a review of website content from all major Australian IVF clinics and found some made success rate comparisons without adequately disclosing and quantifying the data used to make the claims. | Earlier this year the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission launched a review of website content from all major Australian IVF clinics and found some made success rate comparisons without adequately disclosing and quantifying the data used to make the claims. |
| ACCC commissioner Sarah Court said some IVF clinics had also “used technical terms understood by industry participants but which may be misleading to consumers without further clarification or explanation”. | ACCC commissioner Sarah Court said some IVF clinics had also “used technical terms understood by industry participants but which may be misleading to consumers without further clarification or explanation”. |
| Some IVF clinics used “clinical pregnancy rate” data to compare their success rates where that data reflected the clinic’s success in creating an embryo, rather than live birth rates, the ACCC said. These comparisons were sometimes accompanied by photographs of newborn babies, which the ACCC said was likely to lead to consumers being given a misleading impression about the rate of successful pregnancies achieved by the clinic. | Some IVF clinics used “clinical pregnancy rate” data to compare their success rates where that data reflected the clinic’s success in creating an embryo, rather than live birth rates, the ACCC said. These comparisons were sometimes accompanied by photographs of newborn babies, which the ACCC said was likely to lead to consumers being given a misleading impression about the rate of successful pregnancies achieved by the clinic. |
| “The Australian consumer law applies to the advertising of all goods or services offered to Australian consumers, including complex medical procedures such as these,” Court said. | “The Australian consumer law applies to the advertising of all goods or services offered to Australian consumers, including complex medical procedures such as these,” Court said. |
| “The ACCC expects that all IVF clinics will take care to ensure that success rate comparisons are clear and accurate, and based on data that is explained in non-technical terms so that consumers can rely on it to make informed choices about which IVF clinic to use. | “The ACCC expects that all IVF clinics will take care to ensure that success rate comparisons are clear and accurate, and based on data that is explained in non-technical terms so that consumers can rely on it to make informed choices about which IVF clinic to use. |
| “The ACCC will continue to monitor complaints received about claims made by IVF providers and won’t hesitate to take further action if IVF providers are making false or misleading claims.” | “The ACCC will continue to monitor complaints received about claims made by IVF providers and won’t hesitate to take further action if IVF providers are making false or misleading claims.” |
| The ACCC’s investigation followed a complaint from the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency. | The ACCC’s investigation followed a complaint from the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency. |