This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-37987213

The article has changed 10 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 3 Version 4
RSPCA should be stripped of prosecution powers, say MPs RSPCA should be stripped of prosecution powers, say MPs
(about 1 hour later)
The RSPCA should be stripped of its powers to routinely prosecute animal welfare cases, according to MPs.The RSPCA should be stripped of its powers to routinely prosecute animal welfare cases, according to MPs.
The Commons environment committee said there was a "conflict of interest" between the charity's power to prosecute and its role in investigating cases, campaigning and fundraising.The Commons environment committee said there was a "conflict of interest" between the charity's power to prosecute and its role in investigating cases, campaigning and fundraising.
But the RSPCA defended its work and said the move was not supported by the government or animal welfare groups.But the RSPCA defended its work and said the move was not supported by the government or animal welfare groups.
The government says it will consider the committee's recommendations.The government says it will consider the committee's recommendations.
The Environment, Food and Rural Affairs committee called on ministers to change the law concerning the RSPCA's powers.The Environment, Food and Rural Affairs committee called on ministers to change the law concerning the RSPCA's powers.
Everyone in England and Wales has the right to bring a private prosecution against someone who they believe has committed an offence.Everyone in England and Wales has the right to bring a private prosecution against someone who they believe has committed an offence.
The Committee recommends the RSPCA should continue its work investigating animal welfare cases, but "withdraw from acting as a prosecutor of first resort" and let the Crown Prosecution Service or other statutory bodies carry out this role.The Committee recommends the RSPCA should continue its work investigating animal welfare cases, but "withdraw from acting as a prosecutor of first resort" and let the Crown Prosecution Service or other statutory bodies carry out this role.
If there were no statutory alternatives - and where a private prosecution would further its charitable aims - the RSPCA could still be allowed to bring a case, said the committee.If there were no statutory alternatives - and where a private prosecution would further its charitable aims - the RSPCA could still be allowed to bring a case, said the committee.
What prosecution powers does the RSPCA have?
The RSPCA exercises its right to act as private prosecutor under the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985.
The charity has no legal enforcement powers or authority in its own right, so all prosecutions are brought via independent solicitors acting for the RSPCA.
The director of public prosecutions does have the right to intervene in any criminal proceedings if she feels that proceedings are unjustified.
Other charities have brought prosecutions in cases where the police or CPS haven't taken action.
But the cross-party committee was not unanimous; the call to transfer powers was opposed by three Labour MPs and one SDLP MP, and carried by the five Conservatives and one SNP MP.But the cross-party committee was not unanimous; the call to transfer powers was opposed by three Labour MPs and one SDLP MP, and carried by the five Conservatives and one SNP MP.
RSPCA prosecutions
Opposing committee members stressed that anyone had a right to bring forward a private prosecution and "to single out the RSPCA as not being able to do this would be invidious, as it has the experience and skills and it furthers its charitable objectives".Opposing committee members stressed that anyone had a right to bring forward a private prosecution and "to single out the RSPCA as not being able to do this would be invidious, as it has the experience and skills and it furthers its charitable objectives".
But Conservative MP and chairman Neil Parish said the committee was not convinced the charity was in any better position to prosecute than the CPS. But Conservative MP and chairman Neil Parish said the committee was not convinced the charity was in any better position to prosecute than the CPS and "should step back from making prosecutions itself".
"It should step back from making prosecutions itself, continuing instead to work closely with the police and prosecution service to protect the welfare of animals," he said. Evidence heard included testimony from the Self-Help Group (SHG) for farmers, pet owners and others experiencing difficulties with the RSPCA which said some people felt alienated by the charity's "targeting of vulnerable, ill or elderly people" and the removal of their animals.
Evidence heard included testimony from the Self-Help Group (SHG) for farmers, pet owners and others experiencing difficulties with the RSPCA which said some pet owners felt alienated by the charity's "targeting of vulnerable, ill or elderly people" and the removal of their animals.
Maximum penalty
RSPCA chief executive Jeremy Cooper rejected the MPs' criticism.RSPCA chief executive Jeremy Cooper rejected the MPs' criticism.
"We are extremely proud of our near 200 years of experience investigating and prosecuting animal cruelty and our 92% success rate - which is currently a higher percentage than the CPS," he said."We are extremely proud of our near 200 years of experience investigating and prosecuting animal cruelty and our 92% success rate - which is currently a higher percentage than the CPS," he said.
"For us the key test will be if the recommendation improves animal welfare and we suspect the answer in this case would probably be no.""For us the key test will be if the recommendation improves animal welfare and we suspect the answer in this case would probably be no."
RSPCA prosecutions
But Tim Bonner, Chief Executive of the Countryside Alliance, who have been critical of the RSPCA, told the Today Programme: "The RSPCA is in a position that no other private organisation is.But Tim Bonner, Chief Executive of the Countryside Alliance, who have been critical of the RSPCA, told the Today Programme: "The RSPCA is in a position that no other private organisation is.
"They retain this prosecution role which all other charities and private individuals gave up in the 80s when the CPS was formed.""They retain this prosecution role which all other charities and private individuals gave up in the 80s when the CPS was formed."
Speaking to BBC Breakfast the RSPCA's head of public affairs, David Bowles, said most of the charity's work was "about educating people to take care of their animals much better".Speaking to BBC Breakfast the RSPCA's head of public affairs, David Bowles, said most of the charity's work was "about educating people to take care of their animals much better".
Last year the RSPCA spent £4.9 million on legal fees and cases. Mr Bowles said that represented about 3% of the charity's budget.Last year the RSPCA spent £4.9 million on legal fees and cases. Mr Bowles said that represented about 3% of the charity's budget.
He added: "Investigations was the number one reason people gave us money for and prosecutions was the number two issue."He added: "Investigations was the number one reason people gave us money for and prosecutions was the number two issue."
Maximum penalty
In a joint statement, Battersea Dogs and Cats Home, Blue Cross, Cats Protection, the Dogs Trust and the PDSA said they feared that without the RSPCA, "many cases of unacceptable animal abuse would go unprosecuted".In a joint statement, Battersea Dogs and Cats Home, Blue Cross, Cats Protection, the Dogs Trust and the PDSA said they feared that without the RSPCA, "many cases of unacceptable animal abuse would go unprosecuted".
The committee also recommended the maximum penalty for animal welfare crimes should be increased from 51 weeks to five years.The committee also recommended the maximum penalty for animal welfare crimes should be increased from 51 weeks to five years.
And it called for a ban on the third party sale of dogs, so they would only be available from licensed, regulated breeders or approved rehoming organisations.And it called for a ban on the third party sale of dogs, so they would only be available from licensed, regulated breeders or approved rehoming organisations.
Neither the SSPCA (the Scottish equivalent of the RSPCA) nor the Ulster Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (USPCA) bring prosecutions, as the RSPCA does in England and Wales.Neither the SSPCA (the Scottish equivalent of the RSPCA) nor the Ulster Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (USPCA) bring prosecutions, as the RSPCA does in England and Wales.
What are your experiences with the RSPCA? Have you had your pets taken from you? Let us know. Email haveyoursay@bbc.co.uk with your stories.What are your experiences with the RSPCA? Have you had your pets taken from you? Let us know. Email haveyoursay@bbc.co.uk with your stories.
Please include a contact number if you are willing to speak to a BBC journalist. You can also contact us in the following ways:Please include a contact number if you are willing to speak to a BBC journalist. You can also contact us in the following ways:
·WhatsApp: +44 7525 900971·WhatsApp: +44 7525 900971
·Tweet: @BBC_HaveYourSay·Tweet: @BBC_HaveYourSay
·Send an SMS or MMS to 61124·Send an SMS or MMS to 61124
Or please use the form below:Or please use the form below: