This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-37995600
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 1 | Version 2 |
---|---|
'Post-truth' declared word of the year by Oxford Dictionaries | 'Post-truth' declared word of the year by Oxford Dictionaries |
(about 5 hours later) | |
Oxford Dictionaries has declared "post-truth" as its 2016 international word of the year, reflecting what it called a "highly-charged" political 12 months. | Oxford Dictionaries has declared "post-truth" as its 2016 international word of the year, reflecting what it called a "highly-charged" political 12 months. |
It is defined as an adjective relating to circumstances in which objective facts are less influential in shaping public opinion than emotional appeals. | It is defined as an adjective relating to circumstances in which objective facts are less influential in shaping public opinion than emotional appeals. |
Its selection follows June's Brexit vote and the US presidential election. | Its selection follows June's Brexit vote and the US presidential election. |
Oxford Dictionaries' Casper Grathwohl said post-truth could become "one of the defining words of our time". | Oxford Dictionaries' Casper Grathwohl said post-truth could become "one of the defining words of our time". |
Post-truth, which has become associated with the phrase "post-truth politics", was chosen ahead of other political terms, including "Brexiteer" and "alt-right" from a shortlist selected to reflect the social, cultural, political, economic and technological trends and events of the year. | |
Post-truth: Here are some fakes we debunked earlier | Post-truth: Here are some fakes we debunked earlier |
Oxford Dictionaries says post-truth is thought to have been first used in 1992. | Oxford Dictionaries says post-truth is thought to have been first used in 1992. |
However, it says the frequency of its usage increased by 2,000% in 2016 compared with last year. | |
Mr Grathwohl said: "Fuelled by the rise of social media as a news source and a growing distrust of facts offered up by the establishment, post-truth as a concept has been finding its linguistic footing for some time," he said. | Mr Grathwohl said: "Fuelled by the rise of social media as a news source and a growing distrust of facts offered up by the establishment, post-truth as a concept has been finding its linguistic footing for some time," he said. |
"We first saw the frequency really spike this year in June with buzz over the Brexit vote and again in July when Donald Trump secured the Republican presidential nomination. | "We first saw the frequency really spike this year in June with buzz over the Brexit vote and again in July when Donald Trump secured the Republican presidential nomination. |
"Given that usage of the term hasn't shown any signs of slowing down, I wouldn't be surprised if post-truth becomes one of the defining words of our time." | "Given that usage of the term hasn't shown any signs of slowing down, I wouldn't be surprised if post-truth becomes one of the defining words of our time." |
'Spasms of history' | 'Spasms of history' |
Dr Claire Hardaker, lecturer in forensic linguistics at Lancaster University, said "freak moments" that get people talking were key to the creation of new words. | |
"When you look back at the dictionary, you get some words that are a spasm of history and they very quickly fall out of use," she said. "They are fashionable, they are trendy and they die. | "When you look back at the dictionary, you get some words that are a spasm of history and they very quickly fall out of use," she said. "They are fashionable, they are trendy and they die. |
"Others live on and become part of our language. But it is very unpredictable." | "Others live on and become part of our language. But it is very unpredictable." |
The 2016 shortlist | The 2016 shortlist |
'Spurts of sound' | |
Science fiction author JD Atkin questioned the merit of some recent dictionary additions. | |
He said: "I'm all for progress, therefore the addition of words such as 'lol' into the dictionary as a reflection of our continually evolving language shouldn't bother me. But it does. | |
"Lol, for example, is not a word. It is barely splutter. It is an infantile acronym and, I secretly suspect, in most cases a lie. You might smile, you might do that weird snort of air from your nose but I bet you five seconds of human contact that you don't laugh. | |
"Such acronyms, mere spurts of sound, have no business hobnobbing amongst the pages of the dictionary." | |
Last year, Oxford Dictionaries chose a "pictograph" as its word of the year for the first time. | |
It said the "face with tears of joy emoji" best represented "the ethos, mood, and preoccupations of 2015". | It said the "face with tears of joy emoji" best represented "the ethos, mood, and preoccupations of 2015". |