This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/health/7427001.stm

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Macmillan ignored smoking warning Macmillan ignored smoking warning
(about 1 hour later)
In the 1950s the Chancellor of the Exchequer Harold Macmillan put the financial benefits of cigarettes over the nation's health, records show.In the 1950s the Chancellor of the Exchequer Harold Macmillan put the financial benefits of cigarettes over the nation's health, records show.
Then health minister Robert Turton advised the 1956 Cabinet to "constantly inform the public of the facts" of the link between smoking and lung cancer.Then health minister Robert Turton advised the 1956 Cabinet to "constantly inform the public of the facts" of the link between smoking and lung cancer.
But Mr MacMillan overuled the recommendation, saying the revenue from smoking was too valuable. But Mr MacMillan, who was prime minister from 1957 to 1963, said the revenue from smoking was too valuable.
The notes from 1955 to 1956 have been released at the National Archives. The shorthand notes were released from the National Archives in Kew, London.
"Expectation of life 73 for smoker and 74 for non-smoker," said the former prime minister. Treasury value
Mr Turton told ministers there was not yet "scientific 'proof"' of the hazards, but admitted the "statistical picture is clear".
Then prime minister Anthony Eden responded by saying the "time is arrived when we should decide whether we have a line".
But Mr MacMillan, who became prime minister after Mr Eden resigned following the Suez crisis, said: "Expectation of life 73 for smoker and 74 for non-smoker."
"Treasury think revenue interest outweighs this. Negligible compared with risk of crossing a street," he added."Treasury think revenue interest outweighs this. Negligible compared with risk of crossing a street," he added.
Peter Powell said he would not have smoked if he knew of the dangers
One smoker who says he should have been warned is Peter Powell from Towcester, Northamptonshire.
Mr Powell, who started smoking in the Army in the 1950s, said if he had known the damaging effects of tobacco he would never have started.
Now in his 70s, Mr Powell finally gave up last year after unsuccessful attempts while in his 30s and 40s.
"If I had realised then that I was going to be doing a lot of damage to myself, I wouldn't have touched them," he said.