This article is from the source 'independent' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/pay-to-stay-scrapped-government-gavin-barwell-housing-council-rents-higher-a7430491.html

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Government scraps Pay To Stay plan to raise rents on higher income council tenants Government scraps Pay To Stay plan to raise rents on higher income council tenants
(35 minutes later)
The Government has scrapped its plans to raise rents on council tenants with higher incomes.The Government has scrapped its plans to raise rents on council tenants with higher incomes.
Housing minister Gavin Barwell announced that the so-called “Pay to stay” policy had been reviewed over the summer and would not be compulsory.Housing minister Gavin Barwell announced that the so-called “Pay to stay” policy had been reviewed over the summer and would not be compulsory.
“Since the summer, the Government has been reviewing this policy,” he said in a written statement.“Since the summer, the Government has been reviewing this policy,” he said in a written statement.
“We have listened carefully to the views of tenants, local authorities and others and as a result, we have decided not to proceed with a compulsory approach.”“We have listened carefully to the views of tenants, local authorities and others and as a result, we have decided not to proceed with a compulsory approach.”
Mr Barwell said local councils would be allowed to impose the policy voluntarily. Local councils have however been among those calling for the policy to be scrapped or re-thought.Mr Barwell said local councils would be allowed to impose the policy voluntarily. Local councils have however been among those calling for the policy to be scrapped or re-thought.
Under the policy tenant households with an income higher than £31,000 or £40,000 in London would be forced to pay rents that were close to the market rent.  This means a working couple on £15,500 each outside of London would be defined as high-income. Additionally, local councils already have the power to implement pay-to-stay voluntarily and none have yet done so.
More follows… Labour's shadow housing minister John Healey welcomed the U-turn and said the Government should now re-think the rest of their housing policies. 
Under the policy tenant households with an income higher than £31,000 or £40,000 in London would be forced to pay rents that were close to the market rent.  
This means a working couple on £15,500 each outside of London would be defined as high-income.
Around 70,000 social tenants were set to lose around £1,000 a year from the policy.
The policy was expected to raise just £75 million annually, according to the latest estimates by Whitehall officials.
Mr Barwell continued: "The Government remains committed to delivering its objective of ensuring social housing is occupied by those who need it most.
"But we need to do so in a way that supports those ordinary working class families who can struggle to get by, and in a way which delivers real savings to the taxpayer.
"The policy as previously envisaged did not meet those aims."
The Government also today confirmed it would press ahead with plans to force councils to give their tenants fixed-term tenancy agreements.
The shadow minister Mr Healey said: “This welcome u-turn is a victory for Labour’s year-long campaign against the ‘tenant tax’ which was set to hike rents for thousands of middle income households.
“Having recognised this move was a big mistake, Ministers must now re-think the rest of their failed housing decisions over the last six years.
“After disastrous figures last week showing that the number of new affordable homes for social rent has fallen to the lowest level since records began, top of the list must be reversing the forced sale of vital council homes and the huge cuts to investment in new genuinely affordable homes.”