This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/21/us/green-card-errors-visa.html

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Agency’s Green Card Errors Said to Be Worse Than First Thought Agency’s Green Card Errors Said to Be Worse Than First Thought
(35 minutes later)
The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services sent green cards to people that contained incorrect information or were duplicates, or mailed them to the wrong addresses, according to a report released on Monday by the Department of Homeland Security’s Office of Inspector General. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services sent green cards to people that contained incorrect information or were duplicates, or mailed them to the wrong addresses, according to a report released on Monday by the Department of Homeland Security’s Office of Inspector General.
The immigration agency, which is part of the Department of Homeland Security, told auditors that it had received more than 200,000 reports of cards that were not being delivered to approved applicants.The immigration agency, which is part of the Department of Homeland Security, told auditors that it had received more than 200,000 reports of cards that were not being delivered to approved applicants.
The report also found that more than 2,400 immigrants who were approved for two-year conditional resident status were instead given cards that were good for 10 years.The report also found that more than 2,400 immigrants who were approved for two-year conditional resident status were instead given cards that were good for 10 years.
The report was a follow-up to a March 2016 review that found the agency had possibly sent hundreds of green cards to the wrong addresses. The report was a follow-up to a March review that found the agency had possibly sent hundreds of green cards to the wrong addresses.
The latest report said the problem was far worse than originally believed. In the last three years, it said, the immigration agency produced at least 19,000 cards that included incorrect information or were issued in duplicate.The latest report said the problem was far worse than originally believed. In the last three years, it said, the immigration agency produced at least 19,000 cards that included incorrect information or were issued in duplicate.
Homeland Security auditors said the immigration agency had instituted several methods for addressing problems with erroneous or duplicate green cards.Homeland Security auditors said the immigration agency had instituted several methods for addressing problems with erroneous or duplicate green cards.
“However, these methods — manual intervention, production controls and system enhancements — have not proven adequate to ensure quality across the volume of cards produced and issued each year,” auditors wrote.“However, these methods — manual intervention, production controls and system enhancements — have not proven adequate to ensure quality across the volume of cards produced and issued each year,” auditors wrote.
The report released on Monday comes after an inquiry in September that found the immigration agency had used incomplete fingerprint records to grant citizenship to hundreds of people who were to have been deported. The report released on Monday came after an inquiry in September that found the immigration agency had used incomplete fingerprint records to grant citizenship to hundreds of people who were to have been deported.
That inquiry, also from the Office of Inspector General, found that nearly 900 people were granted citizenship because neither Homeland Security nor F.B.I. databases contained all of the fingerprint records of people who had previously been designated for deportation. That inquiry, also from the Office of Inspector General, found that nearly 900 people had been granted citizenship because neither Homeland Security nor F.B.I. databases contained all of the fingerprint records of people who had previously been designated for deportation.
Nearly 150,000 older fingerprint records were not digitized or simply not included in Homeland Security’s databases when they were being developed, the report said. In other cases, fingerprints that were taken by immigration officials during the deportation process were not forwarded to the F.B.I. Nearly 150,000 older fingerprint records were not digitized or simply not included in Homeland Security’s databases when they were being developed, the report said. In other cases, fingerprints that immigration officials had taken during the deportation process were not forwarded to the F.B.I.
The immigration agency is supposed to check the fingerprints of applicants for citizenship against a number of databases to make sure that they do not have criminal records or pose a threat. The immigration agency is supposed to check the fingerprints of applicants for citizenship against a number of databases to make sure that the applicants do not have criminal records or pose a threat.
But because the fingerprint databases are incomplete, the report found that the agency had no way of knowing if the individuals were actually who they said they were. But because the fingerprint databases are incomplete, the report found, the agency had no way of knowing if the individuals were y who they said they were.
As naturalized citizens, these individuals retain many of the rights and privileges of American citizenship, including serving in law enforcement, obtaining a security clearance and sponsoring the entry of other foreigners into the United States, the report said.As naturalized citizens, these individuals retain many of the rights and privileges of American citizenship, including serving in law enforcement, obtaining a security clearance and sponsoring the entry of other foreigners into the United States, the report said.