This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/entertainment/7430621.stm
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 1 | Version 2 |
---|---|
BBC stars 'are not paid too much' | |
(2 days later) | |
The likes of Jonathan Ross and Chris Moyles are not receiving salaries above the market rate, according to a review of how the BBC pays its top names. | |
The report, commissioned by the corporation's governing body, the BBC Trust, says in some cases stars get paid less than they would elsewhere. | |
The top 30 to 40 stars across all TV and radio each earn more than £1m a year, the report added. | |
But it said the BBC should "walk away" from stars who are too expensive. | |
The BBC should use its position to drive prices down, the report stated. | |
'Difficult position' | |
The review was commissioned after some salary details were leaked to the press, including a three-year deal for Jonathan Ross reportedly worth £18m. | |
Other figures suggested that Jeremy Paxman was paid £940,000 a year and Radio 2's Sir Terry Wogan got £800,000 a year, while Radio 1 breakfast host Chris Moyles took home £630,000. | |
The Trust found that the top 10 earners in TV and radio can take home earn more than £2m. | |
The BBC has a list of its top 50 "named talent", the report stated, whose earnings are rising "significantly faster than the recent 6% annual rate for total talent spending". | |
Sir Michael Lyons speaks on BBC Breakfast | |
In 2006/7, the BBC made an investment of about £242m in on screen and on air talent which represented around 5.6% of its total licence fee expenditure. | |
The vast majority of its 200,000 talent contract payments were for less than £1000. | |
But the trust's report found that there was "no evidence that the BBC is paying more than the market price" for its top names. | |
However, it does note that the salaries paid "to a small number of top talent working in network radio are much higher than those offered on commercial radio". | |
READ THE FINDINGS |