This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/nov/27/human-rights-watchdog-ehrc-uk-dampen-divisive-brexit-rhetoric
The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 2 | Version 3 |
|---|---|
| Human rights watchdog asks UK to dampen divisive Brexit rhetoric Human rights watchdog asks UK to dampen divisive Brexit rhetoric | |
| (about 11 hours later) | |
| The Equality and Human Rights Commission has written to the UK political parties asking them to tone down their Brexit rhetoric. | The Equality and Human Rights Commission has written to the UK political parties asking them to tone down their Brexit rhetoric. |
| The EHRC suggests there needs to be a discussion about British values as the government looks to formalise the nation’s divorce from Brussels following the leave vote on 23 June. | The EHRC suggests there needs to be a discussion about British values as the government looks to formalise the nation’s divorce from Brussels following the leave vote on 23 June. |
| The commission states in the letter that racist, antisemitic and homophobic attacks that have taken place in the aftermath of the referendum are “all stains on our society”. | The commission states in the letter that racist, antisemitic and homophobic attacks that have taken place in the aftermath of the referendum are “all stains on our society”. |
| “We are concerned that attacks on supporters of both sides of the Brexit debate have polarised many parts of the country,” the letter reads. | “We are concerned that attacks on supporters of both sides of the Brexit debate have polarised many parts of the country,” the letter reads. |
| “There are those who used, and continue to use, public concern about immigration policy and the economy to legitimise hate. The vast majority of people who voted to leave the European Union did so because they believe it is best for Britain and not because they are intolerant of others.” | “There are those who used, and continue to use, public concern about immigration policy and the economy to legitimise hate. The vast majority of people who voted to leave the European Union did so because they believe it is best for Britain and not because they are intolerant of others.” |
| The letter calls on the government to do more to combat hate peddled by a “small minority”, as it also suggests there should be a review of the effectiveness of sentencing for hate crimes in England and Wales, including the ability to increase sentencing for hate crimes. | The letter calls on the government to do more to combat hate peddled by a “small minority”, as it also suggests there should be a review of the effectiveness of sentencing for hate crimes in England and Wales, including the ability to increase sentencing for hate crimes. |
| It states that “politicians of all sides should be aware of the effect on national mood of their words and policies” even when those policies are not acted upon – like the government’s now-abandoned proposal for companies to list foreign workers. | It states that “politicians of all sides should be aware of the effect on national mood of their words and policies” even when those policies are not acted upon – like the government’s now-abandoned proposal for companies to list foreign workers. |
| “Your offices bring with them a responsibility to ensure that policy debate is conducted in a way that brings the country together and moves it forward,” the EHRC stated. | “Your offices bring with them a responsibility to ensure that policy debate is conducted in a way that brings the country together and moves it forward,” the EHRC stated. |
| “Robust discussion is a central pillar of our democracy and nothing should be done to undermine freedom of expression. The right to free and fair elections supported by accurate information and respectful debate is also essential to our democratic process. | “Robust discussion is a central pillar of our democracy and nothing should be done to undermine freedom of expression. The right to free and fair elections supported by accurate information and respectful debate is also essential to our democratic process. |
| “Our elected representatives and the media should reflect and foster the best values in our society and engage people on contentious issues in a responsible and considered way.” | “Our elected representatives and the media should reflect and foster the best values in our society and engage people on contentious issues in a responsible and considered way.” |
| Meanwhile, the commission chairman, David Isaac, has also expressed concerns about the way in which businesses approach religious belief in the workplace. | Meanwhile, the commission chairman, David Isaac, has also expressed concerns about the way in which businesses approach religious belief in the workplace. |
| “There are a lot of myths out there when it comes to dealing with religion at work. I want to put the record straight,” he said. “It is about taking a common sense approach. You can send Christmas cards and have a Christmas party and you might also decide to provide facilities for special religious diets, but that is your choice.” | “There are a lot of myths out there when it comes to dealing with religion at work. I want to put the record straight,” he said. “It is about taking a common sense approach. You can send Christmas cards and have a Christmas party and you might also decide to provide facilities for special religious diets, but that is your choice.” |