This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/nov/29/dutch-parliament-paves-way-for-approval-of-limited-ban-on-islamic-veils

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Dutch parliament paves way for approval of limited ban on Islamic veils Dutch parliament paves way for approval of partial Islamic veil ban Dutch parliament paves way for approval of partial Islamic veil ban
(35 minutes later)
Lawmakers in the lower house of the Dutch parliament on Tuesday approved a limited ban on “face-covering clothing”, including Islamic veils and robes such as the burqa and niqab. The lower house of the Dutch parliament has approved a limited ban on “face-covering clothing”, including the burqa and niqab.
The legislation, approved by a large majority in the 150-seat lower house, must now be approved by the upper house of parliament before it can be signed into law. The legislation, approved on Tuesday by a large majority in the 150-seat house of representatives, must be approved by the upper house of parliament before it can be signed into law.
In a text message to the Associated Press, anti-Islam lawmaker Geert Wilders called the limited ban “a step in the right direction” and said he will push for a full burqa ban if his Freedom party wins elections in March. In a text to Associated Press, the anti-Islam politician Geert Wilders called the limited ban “a step in the right direction” and said he will push for the burqa to be outlawed entirely if his rightwing Freedom party wins the general election in March.
Studies suggest that only a few hundred women in the Netherlands wear niqabs or full-face burqas but successive governments have attempted to ban them, following the example of European countries such as France and Belgium. Studies suggest that only a few hundred women in the Netherlands wear niqabs or full-face burqas, but successive governments have attempted to ban them, following the example of France and Belgium.
The Dutch proposal, described by the government as “religion-neutral”, does not go as far as the complete bans in those countries. It applies on public transport and in education institutions, health institutions such as hospitals and government buildings. The Dutch proposal, described by the government as “religion-neutral”, does not go as far as the complete bans introduced in those countries. It applies on public transport and in educational institutions, health institutions such as hospitals, and government buildings.
In a debate last week that paved the way for Tuesday’s swift vote, interior minister Ronald Plasterk acknowledged that debate about the burqa had played a major role in the ban. But Plasterk, who is from the centre-left Labour party, said that in a free country like the Netherlands people should be allowed to appear in public with their faces covered if they want to, but that in government buildings, schools and hospitals, people need to be able to look each other in the face. In a debate last week that paved the way for the vote, the interior minister, Ronald Plasterk, acknowledged that the furore about the burqa had played a major role in the ban’s approval.
But Plasterk, from the Labour party, said people should be allowed to appear in public with their faces covered if they wanted to, but in government buildings, schools and hospitals, it was essential to be able to look each other in the face.
The maximum fine for breaching the ban, which also covers ski masks and full-face helmets, is just over €400 (£340).The maximum fine for breaching the ban, which also covers ski masks and full-face helmets, is just over €400 (£340).