This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/dec/01/tunisia-attack-uk-government-want-inquests-to-to-be-held-partly-in-secret
The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 4 | Version 5 |
---|---|
Tunisia attack: UK wants inquests to be held partly in secret | |
(35 minutes later) | |
The UK government wants the inquests into the deaths of 30 British tourists killed by a gunman on a Tunisian beach to be held partly in secret over fears certain material could be used by terrorists to plot further atrocities. | The UK government wants the inquests into the deaths of 30 British tourists killed by a gunman on a Tunisian beach to be held partly in secret over fears certain material could be used by terrorists to plot further atrocities. |
Security measures at hotels and resorts and details of how the UK and Tunisian governments work together to protect travellers are among the evidence that the government deems too sensitive to be discussed in public. | Security measures at hotels and resorts and details of how the UK and Tunisian governments work together to protect travellers are among the evidence that the government deems too sensitive to be discussed in public. |
Families of the victims of the massacre, which was claimed by Islamic State, will be able to see all information shared with the court and it is understood they have agreed it would be inappropriate for some material to be aired publicly. | Families of the victims of the massacre, which was claimed by Islamic State, will be able to see all information shared with the court and it is understood they have agreed it would be inappropriate for some material to be aired publicly. |
Clive Garner, a lawyer at Irwin Mitchell, which is representing 20 of the families who lost loved ones, said: “The government is applying to have some evidence heard behind closed doors and while we recognise the need to safeguard information critical to national security, this needs to be balanced with the families’ right to a transparent and open hearing.” | Clive Garner, a lawyer at Irwin Mitchell, which is representing 20 of the families who lost loved ones, said: “The government is applying to have some evidence heard behind closed doors and while we recognise the need to safeguard information critical to national security, this needs to be balanced with the families’ right to a transparent and open hearing.” |
The inquests into the deaths of 30 British victims shot dead by Seifeddine Rezgui in the popular resort of Port El Kantaoui, near Sousse, in June 2015 will resume next month. A total of 38 people were killed in the attack and a similar number were injured. | The inquests into the deaths of 30 British victims shot dead by Seifeddine Rezgui in the popular resort of Port El Kantaoui, near Sousse, in June 2015 will resume next month. A total of 38 people were killed in the attack and a similar number were injured. |
The government made the application to hold part of the hearings behind closed doors at a pre-inquest review hearing at the royal courts ofjustice on Thursday. Judge Nicholas Loraine-Smith will make a ruling on the application later. | The government made the application to hold part of the hearings behind closed doors at a pre-inquest review hearing at the royal courts ofjustice on Thursday. Judge Nicholas Loraine-Smith will make a ruling on the application later. |
Loraine-Smith told the hearing nothing would be kept from the families of victims, adding: “As far as possible everything will be in public.” | Loraine-Smith told the hearing nothing would be kept from the families of victims, adding: “As far as possible everything will be in public.” |
He said “the last thing in the world” that families would want to do is to assist anyone planning a future attack. | He said “the last thing in the world” that families would want to do is to assist anyone planning a future attack. |
Andrew O’Connor QC, for the government, told the judge it was “in the interests of national security” to keep some material out of the public domain, adding: “This risk is assessed by security experts to be a very real one.” | Andrew O’Connor QC, for the government, told the judge it was “in the interests of national security” to keep some material out of the public domain, adding: “This risk is assessed by security experts to be a very real one.” |
Andrew Ritchie QC, representing 20 families, said it iwas their view that a “full and fearless” investigation was required to remain in keeping with the principle of open justice. | Andrew Ritchie QC, representing 20 families, said it iwas their view that a “full and fearless” investigation was required to remain in keeping with the principle of open justice. |
He said that was particularly important in the context of the case, adding: “UK citizens travelling abroad face this sort of risk not only in Tunisia but around the world.” | He said that was particularly important in the context of the case, adding: “UK citizens travelling abroad face this sort of risk not only in Tunisia but around the world.” |
Ritchie said that “at the heart of the open justice principle”, it was the coroner’s role to bring the full facts to light. | Ritchie said that “at the heart of the open justice principle”, it was the coroner’s role to bring the full facts to light. |
At a hearing in September, Ritchie said many families feared the Foreign Office may have failed in its responsibilities to thousands of British tourists. | At a hearing in September, Ritchie said many families feared the Foreign Office may have failed in its responsibilities to thousands of British tourists. |
He said the families were also potentially concerned about the FCO “having cosy chats” with travel companies interested in running profitable businesses “in light of FCO then-current advice that there was a high risk of terrorist activity, including in tourist areas”. | He said the families were also potentially concerned about the FCO “having cosy chats” with travel companies interested in running profitable businesses “in light of FCO then-current advice that there was a high risk of terrorist activity, including in tourist areas”. |