This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-38252457
The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Previous version
1
Next version
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
Sofia Vergara: US actress faces lawsuit 'from own embryos' | Sofia Vergara: US actress faces lawsuit 'from own embryos' |
(about 1 hour later) | |
Modern Family star Sofia Vergara is being, in effect, sued by two frozen embryos she conceived with the partner she split from, US media report. | Modern Family star Sofia Vergara is being, in effect, sued by two frozen embryos she conceived with the partner she split from, US media report. |
The embryos, named Emma and Isabella, are listed in Louisiana court documents obtained by the New York Post. | The embryos, named Emma and Isabella, are listed in Louisiana court documents obtained by the New York Post. |
She and Nick Loeb separated in 2014 and he has already tried unsuccessfully to sue for the embryos' custody. | She and Nick Loeb separated in 2014 and he has already tried unsuccessfully to sue for the embryos' custody. |
The new lawsuit argues that the embryos are being deprived of their inheritance from a trust by not being born. | The new lawsuit argues that the embryos are being deprived of their inheritance from a trust by not being born. |
The trust is reported to have been created for them in Louisiana, although the embryos are located in California. | The trust is reported to have been created for them in Louisiana, although the embryos are located in California. |
Louisiana is considered a "pro-life" state and under its law a fertilised egg is seen as a "juridical person". | Louisiana is considered a "pro-life" state and under its law a fertilised egg is seen as a "juridical person". |
The Louisiana case names a trustee as plaintiff, but not Mr Loeb himself. The suit asks that the embryos be transferred to Mr Loeb so that they can be born and receive their inheritance. | The Louisiana case names a trustee as plaintiff, but not Mr Loeb himself. The suit asks that the embryos be transferred to Mr Loeb so that they can be born and receive their inheritance. |
Ms Vergara, 44, and Mr Loeb, a 41-year-old businessman, created the embryos at a California clinic through in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) in 2013. | |
A contract signed at the time is reported to have stipulated that neither partner could do anything with the embryos without the other's consent. | A contract signed at the time is reported to have stipulated that neither partner could do anything with the embryos without the other's consent. |
Ms Vergara, according the suit, is alleged to be refusing to allow them to be implanted in a surrogate mother. | Ms Vergara, according the suit, is alleged to be refusing to allow them to be implanted in a surrogate mother. |
Mr Loeb's legal team allege that both Ms Vergara and Mr Loeb went into the IVF process on the understanding that the embryos would be brought to term. | |
'Going to hell' | |
The IVF process initially produced several embryos, prompting the following text message exchange, according to the plaintiff's documents. | |
Mr Loeb: "Now what. You can't keep 4 frozen lives forever or kill them, we will go to hell." | |
Ms Vergara: "We r going to hell regardless". | |
Ms Vergara's lawyer, Fred Silberberg, told US weekly the case against his client would fail. | |
"That genetic material was created pursuant to a written agreement that required both parties' written consent to attempt to create a pregnancy." | |
Ms Vergara is now married to American actor, Joe Manganiello. She has a son by previous marriage. | |
The case has again thrown the spotlight in the United States on the issue of when a fertilised egg should be considered a human being. | The case has again thrown the spotlight in the United States on the issue of when a fertilised egg should be considered a human being. |
The Supreme Court and abortion? | The Supreme Court and abortion? |
US top court hears key abortion case | US top court hears key abortion case |
In the state of Ohio, Republican lawmakers have approved a bill which would ban abortions once a heartbeat has been detected in an embryo. | In the state of Ohio, Republican lawmakers have approved a bill which would ban abortions once a heartbeat has been detected in an embryo. |
The measure, which has yet to be signed into law by Governor John Kasich, could mean no abortions six weeks after conception. | The measure, which has yet to be signed into law by Governor John Kasich, could mean no abortions six weeks after conception. |
It would be one of the strictest abortion laws in the US if approved. | It would be one of the strictest abortion laws in the US if approved. |
Previous version
1
Next version