This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk_politics/7435839.stm

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Darling faces 10p tax questions 10p tax help too slow - Darling
(about 2 hours later)
Chancellor Alistair Darling is being questioned about the abolition of the lowest tax rate, and measures he brought in to try to limit its impact. Chancellor Alistair Darling has admitted to MPs that ministers should have moved "faster" to compensate those who lost out over the 10p tax rate.
He is appearing before MPs on the Treasury Select Committee, which is holding an inquiry into the effects of losing the 10p tax band. And he said he wanted to do more to help the million people not compensated by his £2.7bn emergency package in May.
In May he announced a higher allowance for basic rate taxpayers for this year. He said compensatory measures for the over-65s and many parents were brought in when the tax rate was scrapped.
But the Institute for Fiscal Studies suggests that once it expires, 18m families will lose £150 a year. But he said: "Should we have gone faster and further? Yes we should, which led to my announcement in May."
And it is estimated that almost one million people are still worse off this year, despite government concessions on the 10p rate. Mr Darling was answering questions from MPs on the Treasury Select Committee, which is holding an inquiry into the effects of the 10p tax band being axed.
The decision to abolish the 10p tax rate, made by Gordon Brown in his last Budget as chancellor, proved very unpopular when it came into force in April this year - alongside a reduction in the basic rate of tax from 22% to 20%. Fiscal rules
The government had faced a backbench rebellion on the issue, amid reports that 5.3 million of the UK's lowest earners would be worse off. Before he announced concessions in May, it was estimated that 5.3m low-paid people would have been left worse off by the change - which threatened to provoke a backbench rebellion by Labour MPs.
But in May, Mr Darling announced a one-off increase in the personal tax allowance for millions of basic rate tax payers, at a cost of £2.7bn, amounting to an extra £120 a year for anyone earning up to £40,835. He told MPs he did not accept he had put the government's own fiscal rules, which require public sector borrowing to be held below 40% of national income, at risk by his concessions.
However, in a recent study the IFS, an independent think tank, said after April 2009, 18 million families would lose on average £150 a year. It was necessary to announce it as quickly as possible - we should have done something faster and we should have done more Alistair Darling
The Treasury committee, chaired by senior Labour backbencher John McFall, is conducting a brief inquiry into "the effects of the abolition of the 10 pence rate" and other measures that might be taken in its absence. It is expected to report within weeks. He said it would have been wrong to take the money out of the economy, by tax increases elsewhere, at a time the economy was slowing.
In May, just weeks after the Budget and following a rebellion by Labour MPs, he announced a £2.7bn package effectively giving an extra £120 this year to all basic rate tax payers.
Conservative MP Philip Dunne quoted an interview Mr Darling did shortly after becoming chancellor, in which he said that any tax changes should be "made at the proper time, in the context of the Budget, or the pre-Budget report".
Failed in job?
Mr Dunne asked if Mr Darling felt he had failed in the job.
The chancellor: "I think in relation to the announcement made in May, I'm not aware that there are many people who are seriously suggesting we should not have said anything until November.
"It was necessary to announce it as quickly as possible - we should have done something faster and we should have done more and I think, having recognised that, it would have been completely wrong to have delayed making any announcement until the autumn."
"I have said on many occasions that I'm sorry this situation arose in the first place and it has been sorted out."
'More to help'
Asked if a full analysis had been done of the effects of the change when it was being planned, he said "the distributional effects of any changes are looked at" and it had been recognised some people would lose out.
Some changes had been made to help those aged over 65 and families with children but added: "If you are asking should we have gone faster and further, yes we should have."
He said about four million people left worse off by the abolition of the lowest tax rate had been compensated, but admitted a further one million were still worse off.
"There are people we still want to do more to help and we will do that in the context of the Pre-Budget Report," he said.
But he refused to outline exactly what he was intending to do once this year's tax concessions expired but said he was committed to helping those on low incomes.
Conservative MP Michael Fallon said, as it was estimated that four million people hit by the 10p tax band abolition had been helped - along with a further 13 million families, if the higher personal tax allowance was not continued it was inevitable that 13m people would be worse off next year.
Mr Darling urged him to wait to see what measures he put forward in the pre-Budget report.
The decision to abolish the 10p tax rate, made by Gordon Brown in his last Budget as chancellor, came into force in April this year - alongside a reduction in the basic rate of tax from 22% to 20%.
The Treasury committee is conducting a brief inquiry into the abolition of the 10p tax rate and compensatory measures that is expected to report within weeks.