This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/dec/12/donald-trump-questions-us-commitment-to-one-china-policy

The article has changed 12 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Donald Trump questions US commitment to 'One China' policy Donald Trump questions US commitment to 'One China' policy
(35 minutes later)
Donald Trump has risked further alienating China’s Communist party leaders after declaring he was willing to abandon more than four decades of diplomatic understanding with the world’s second largest economy unless a fresh accord between the two sides could be struck.Donald Trump has risked further alienating China’s Communist party leaders after declaring he was willing to abandon more than four decades of diplomatic understanding with the world’s second largest economy unless a fresh accord between the two sides could be struck.
In an interview with Fox News, the president-elect said he saw no reason why the US should continuing abiding by the ‘One China’ policy - by which Taiwan is officially considered part of the same single Chinese nation as the mainland - unless a bargain was reached with Beijing involving “other things, including trade”. In an interview with Fox News, the president-elect said he saw no reason why the US should continuing abiding by the “One China” policy by which Taiwan is officially considered part of the same single Chinese nation as the mainland unless Beijing was prepared to enter into some kind of bargain.
“I fully understand the ‘One China’ policy, but I don’t know why we have to be bound by a ‘One China’ policy unless we make a deal with China having to do with other things, including trade,” Trump told the channel on Sunday. “I don’t know why we have to be bound by a ‘One China’ policy unless we make a deal with China having to do with other things, including trade,” Trump told the channel on Sunday.
The comments came less than a fortnight after the property tycoon looked to have initiated a potentially damaging diplomatic row with Beijing by holding a telephone conversation with Taiwan’s president Tsai Ing-wen and subsequently attacking China on Twitter. Washington’s acceptance of the “One China” principle has been a crucial part of the fabric of US-China relations since ties between the two countries were re-established by Richard Nixon and Mao Zedong in 1972.
Trump’s comments came less than a fortnight after the property tycoon looked to have initiated a potentially damaging diplomatic row with Beijing by holding a telephone conversation with Taiwan’s president Tsai Ing-wen and subsequently attacking China on Twitter.
In what was widely seen as an attempt to soothe tensions, Trump subsequently appointed Iowa governor Terry Branstad - a man China called “an old friend of the Chinese people” - as ambassador to Beijing.In what was widely seen as an attempt to soothe tensions, Trump subsequently appointed Iowa governor Terry Branstad - a man China called “an old friend of the Chinese people” - as ambassador to Beijing.
Orville Schell, the head of the Centre on US-China Relations at New York’s Asia Society, said Trump’s latest comments - which the academic described as an “incredible provocation” - were the latest example of the billionaire’s contradictory moves towards China.Orville Schell, the head of the Centre on US-China Relations at New York’s Asia Society, said Trump’s latest comments - which the academic described as an “incredible provocation” - were the latest example of the billionaire’s contradictory moves towards China.
“He sometimes punches Beijing and he sometimes seems to reach out and hug them. The phone call would to Tsai Ing-wen would be the former. Terry Branstad would be the latter. Now we have another upper cut,” he said of the Fox News interview. “He sometimes punches Beijing and he sometimes seems to reach out and hug them. The phone call to Tsai Ing-wen would be the former. Terry Branstad would be the latter. Now we have another upper cut,” he said of the Fox News interview.
Speaking on Sunday, Trump defended his protocol-shredding decision to talk to President Tsai on 2 December, the first such conversation between a US president or president-elect and a leader of the self-ruled island since ties between America and Taiwan were severed in 1979.Speaking on Sunday, Trump defended his protocol-shredding decision to talk to President Tsai on 2 December, the first such conversation between a US president or president-elect and a leader of the self-ruled island since ties between America and Taiwan were severed in 1979.
China considers Taiwan a renegade province and does not allow countries to maintain diplomatic relations with both Taipei and Beijing.China considers Taiwan a renegade province and does not allow countries to maintain diplomatic relations with both Taipei and Beijing.
“I don’t want China dictating to me and this was a call put in to me,” Trump said. “It was a very nice call. Short. And why should some other nation be able to say I can’t take a call?”“I don’t want China dictating to me and this was a call put in to me,” Trump said. “It was a very nice call. Short. And why should some other nation be able to say I can’t take a call?”
“I think it actually would’ve been very disrespectful, to be honest with you, not taking it,” Trump added.“I think it actually would’ve been very disrespectful, to be honest with you, not taking it,” Trump added.
The president-elect also returned to some of the themes on which he bashed China during the election campaign.The president-elect also returned to some of the themes on which he bashed China during the election campaign.
“We’re being hurt very badly by China with devaluation, with taxing us heavy at the borders when we don’t tax them, with building a massive fortress in the middle of the South China Sea, which they shouldn’t be doing, and frankly with not helping us at all with North Korea,” he told Fox News.“We’re being hurt very badly by China with devaluation, with taxing us heavy at the borders when we don’t tax them, with building a massive fortress in the middle of the South China Sea, which they shouldn’t be doing, and frankly with not helping us at all with North Korea,” he told Fox News.
“You have North Korea. You have nuclear weapons and China could solve that problem and they’re not helping us at all.”“You have North Korea. You have nuclear weapons and China could solve that problem and they’re not helping us at all.”
Nick Bisley, an international relations expert from La Trobe University in Melbourne, said: “The signal Trump is sending to China is: ‘You are not going to push us around; you are not going to dictate terms; we are going to be the ones who dictate terms to you’. And he’s also signalling, whether deliberately or not, that there are no sacred cows in US foreign policy, whether in Asia or anywhere else.”
Bisley said Trump’s early moves would have China’s leaders, who had anticipated dealing with a predictable “Obama 3.0” under a Clinton administration, scratching their heads.
“I think they will be genuinely befuddled and just thinking: ‘How do we deal with this guy? What’s the playbook?’”
“The overall consequence of all of this is that it’s going to make the region a lot more uncertain and the temperature is going to be a lot higher.”
Schell said it was hard to predict how Beijing might respond to Trump’s latest gambit.Schell said it was hard to predict how Beijing might respond to Trump’s latest gambit.
“I don’t know what Beijing is going to make of this because they have always dealt with these very square, proper people like Obama and Hillary Clinton who have always sought to keep the US policy relatively constant. And here you have someone who is doing the absolute opposite,” he said.“I don’t know what Beijing is going to make of this because they have always dealt with these very square, proper people like Obama and Hillary Clinton who have always sought to keep the US policy relatively constant. And here you have someone who is doing the absolute opposite,” he said.
“I think they will be very careful about responding because in a certain sense they are meeting a brinksman just like themselves….[and] I don’t know what a brinksman or a bully does when they meet another brinksman and a bully. [Violence] would be one option, but very often one of them backs down.”“I think they will be very careful about responding because in a certain sense they are meeting a brinksman just like themselves….[and] I don’t know what a brinksman or a bully does when they meet another brinksman and a bully. [Violence] would be one option, but very often one of them backs down.”