This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/12/world/asia/indian-police-arrest-moviegoer-for-failing-to-rise-for-anthem.html
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| Indian Police Arrest Moviegoer for Failing to Rise for Anthem | Indian Police Arrest Moviegoer for Failing to Rise for Anthem |
| (35 minutes later) | |
| NEW DELHI — The police in the southern city of Chennai on Sunday arrested a moviegoer accused of failing to stand during the playing of the national anthem, something that was made mandatory for all of the country’s cinemas by a November ruling by India’s Supreme Court. | NEW DELHI — The police in the southern city of Chennai on Sunday arrested a moviegoer accused of failing to stand during the playing of the national anthem, something that was made mandatory for all of the country’s cinemas by a November ruling by India’s Supreme Court. |
| Police officers arrested the man, S. Viji, on suspicion of assault and violating the Prevention of Insults to National Honor Act of 1971. | |
| If Viji, who was released on bail, is found to have violated the act, he could face a fine and imprisonment of up to three years. | |
| It was the first known effort by the police to enforce compliance with the Supreme Court ruling, which requires movie theaters to play the national anthem before each screening. Patrons, according to the ruling, are required to stand respectfully for the duration of the song unless they are physically unable. | It was the first known effort by the police to enforce compliance with the Supreme Court ruling, which requires movie theaters to play the national anthem before each screening. Patrons, according to the ruling, are required to stand respectfully for the duration of the song unless they are physically unable. |
| The court said it was necessary that “the citizens of the country realize that they live in a nation and are duty bound to show respect to the national anthem.” The Constitution, it continued, “does not allow any different notion, or the perception of individual rights.” | The court said it was necessary that “the citizens of the country realize that they live in a nation and are duty bound to show respect to the national anthem.” The Constitution, it continued, “does not allow any different notion, or the perception of individual rights.” |
| The ruling on standing for the national anthem, coming in a season of swelling nationalist pride in India, was greeted with enthusiasm by some Indians and derision by others. | |
| The arrest followed the decision by a group of people at the Chennai theater to resist the order, said M. Sreela, a law student who was part of the group. | The arrest followed the decision by a group of people at the Chennai theater to resist the order, said M. Sreela, a law student who was part of the group. |
| “That was our first movie after the Supreme Court order,” said Sreela, who, like many in India’s south, does not use a surname. “So some of us made a choice not to stand for the national anthem when it was played. So we did not stand up. At the time, nobody objected, not even a glance from anybody.” | “That was our first movie after the Supreme Court order,” said Sreela, who, like many in India’s south, does not use a surname. “So some of us made a choice not to stand for the national anthem when it was played. So we did not stand up. At the time, nobody objected, not even a glance from anybody.” |
| During the intermission, she said, another patron grabbed a man in their group by the collar and confronted him about why he had not stood for the anthem. An exchange of insults inside the theater erupted later into a parking-lot brawl. | During the intermission, she said, another patron grabbed a man in their group by the collar and confronted him about why he had not stood for the anthem. An exchange of insults inside the theater erupted later into a parking-lot brawl. |
| “They were not paying respect to the national anthem, disturbing others and taking selfies,” said Vijay Kumar, who filed a police complaint against the group that refused to stand. Mr. Kumar said that in the ensuing scuffle, he sustained an injury to his nose. | “They were not paying respect to the national anthem, disturbing others and taking selfies,” said Vijay Kumar, who filed a police complaint against the group that refused to stand. Mr. Kumar said that in the ensuing scuffle, he sustained an injury to his nose. |
| “If you don’t respect the national anthem, that’s your business, but at least don’t obstruct others in doing so,” he said. | “If you don’t respect the national anthem, that’s your business, but at least don’t obstruct others in doing so,” he said. |
| The police in Chennai said they arrested one man and were seeking two more. Parties on both sides of the brawl swore out police complaints against the other, alleging harassment, threats and physical abuse. | |
| Sreela said the group had set out to defy the Supreme Court’s demand, which she described as “a force-fed and micromanaged exhibition of nationalism.” | |
| The dictate to stand for the playing of the anthem, she said, serves to “enable self-appointed ‘guardians’ of the law and vigilantes all over the country to more aggressively pursue moral policing on their own equal fellow citizens.” | |
| The statement compared the requirement to President-elect Donald J. Trump’s condemnation of flag-burning, and noted that patrons at a coming film festival “will have to to stand up to the anthem even if it is 40 or more times.” |