This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/18/world/middleeast/as-buses-burn-aleppo-evacuation-is-again-imperiled.html

The article has changed 9 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
As Buses Burn, Aleppo Evacuation Is Again Imperiled Aleppo Evacuation Is Imperiled as Buses Burn and Russia Opposes U.N. Effort
(about 3 hours later)
BEIRUT, Lebanon — The removal of residents from besieged communities in Syria proceeded tenuously on Sunday after rebels set fire to a number of buses that were supposed to evacuate people from two Shiite villages surrounded by insurgents, according to conflict monitors and videos posted online. BEIRUT, Lebanon — The removal of residents from besieged communities in Syria bogged down again on Sunday after rebels opposed to the agreement set fire to buses that were supposed to carry evacuees and Russia said it would block an effort to deploy United Nations monitors to oversee the process.
An agreement was originally aimed to remove civilians and fighters from the last rebel-held districts of eastern Aleppo, but its implementation has been hampered from the start by parties who opposed the deal and wanted to have residents of other besieged communities evacuated as well. The feuding in Syria and at the United Nations underlined the complexity of the war in Syria, where coalitions of forces on the ground receive support from a range of opposing backers whose agendas often clash.
The United Nations Security Council is expected to vote Sunday on a resolution demanding that United Nations agencies and their partners get full access to besieged communities in Aleppo and elsewhere in Syria to ensure aid deliveries. But Russia’s ambassador to the United Nations, Vitaly Churkin, said his country planned to veto it. Turkey and Russia brokered the initial agreement to remove civilians and fighters from the last rebel-held districts of eastern Aleppo, but its implementation has been hampered from the start by parties who opposed the deal and wanted to have residents of other besieged communities evacuated as well.
The halting progress of the evacuations underlines the complexity of the war in Syria, where both sides consist of coalitions of fighters on the ground who are backed by opposing foreign powers. The United Nations Security Council was expected to vote on Sunday on a resolution proposed by France demanding that United Nations agencies and their partners get full access to besieged communities in Aleppo and elsewhere in Syria to ensure aid deliveries and to witness the evacuation. But Russia’s ambassador to the United Nations, Vitaly I. Churkin, said his country planned to veto it.
Fighting for President Bashar al-Assad are Syrian soldiers, Lebanon’s Hezbollah militant group and other Shiite militias from Iraq and elsewhere. They receive support from Iran and Russia, which has been launching airstrikes on insurgent communities. He said he objected to United Nations humanitarian staff members’ being told to “go wander around the ruins of Aleppo without proper preparation.”
Mr. Churkin told reporters on the way into the Security Council chambers: “It has disaster written all over it. This is a provocation.”
The French ambassador, François Delattre, described the resolution as an effort to prevent a blood bath — “another Srebrenica,” he said, referring to the massacre of civilians in that besieged city in Bosnia in the Balkans war more than 20 years ago.
The resolution calls on United Nations staff members to carry out “adequate, neutral monitoring” and report to the Security Council on their findings. It has the backing of the United States.
There are hundreds of United Nations civilian staff members stationed in government-held cities in Syria who could be deployed as monitors, the United Nations said.
At the moment, only monitors from the International Committee of the Red Cross and their local partners with the Syrian Arab Red Crescent are on the ground. They do not report to the Security Council.
Mr. Churkin circulated a rival resolution, asking the United Nations secretary general, Ban Ki-moon, to “provide arrangements, including security arrangements, in coordination with the interested parties, to allow United Nations personnel to monitor the condition of civilians remaining in Aleppo.”
The United Nations was not party to the evacuation agreement, but its officials have been pleading for access to the process to investigate reports of atrocities, which have included alleged killings by pro-government forces of scores of people in eastern Aleppo.
Mr. Ban on Saturday described the area, which has been besieged for months and heavily bombarded by Syrian forces, as “a synonym for hell.”
Last week, the United Nations top envoy to Syria, Staffan de Mistura, said that he had repeatedly asked the Syrian government for permission to allow United Nations staff members to witness the evacuation of civilians and fighters — but that no permission had been received.
On Sunday, his humanitarian adviser, Jan Egeland, repeated that call. “It is important that there are third parties present to witness and assist,” Mr. Egeland wrote in an email.
Carrying out the evacuations requires the cooperation not just of foreign powers but also of the loose coalitions of fighters in Syria.
Fighting for President Bashar al-Assad are Syrian soldiers, the Hezbollah militant group from Lebanon, and other Shiite militias from Iraq and elsewhere. They receive support from Iran and Russia, which has been launching airstrikes on insurgent communities.
On the other side is a patchwork of Sunni rebel militias, including some extremists, who have received support from the United States, Turkey and Persian Gulf countries like Saudi Arabia and Qatar.On the other side is a patchwork of Sunni rebel militias, including some extremists, who have received support from the United States, Turkey and Persian Gulf countries like Saudi Arabia and Qatar.
Nearly six years into the war, both sides have resorted to siege tactics, surrounding communities populated by their foes and bombarding them.Nearly six years into the war, both sides have resorted to siege tactics, surrounding communities populated by their foes and bombarding them.
The evacuation agreement was intended to remove residents from the largest of these enclaves, in eastern Aleppo, which was surrounded by pro-government forces. The evacuation of eastern Aleppo was to begin on Wednesday, but it was aborted after gunfire on the route. Convoys of ambulances and buses began on Thursday to bring about 3,000 civilians and fighters out of eastern Aleppo.
After a delay caused by gunfire on the route, convoys of ambulances and buses began on Thursday to bring about 3,000 civilians and fighters out of eastern Aleppo. At the same time, another convoy headed for two Shiite villages in Idlib Province, Fua and Kfraya, that are surrounded by Sunni rebels, but their way was blocked. So by Friday morning, the evacuations had stopped. At the same time, another convoy headed for two Shiite villages in Idlib Province, Fua and Kfraya, that are surrounded by Sunni rebels, but their way was blocked. By Friday morning, the evacuations had stopped.
They resumed on Sunday, with convoys reaching eastern Aleppo and the Shiite villages, though it remained unclear how the attack on the buses would affect the rest of the evacuations. They resumed on Sunday. Syrian state television reported that one convoy had reached eastern Aleppo, where thousands of people are waiting to be evacuated. But rebel gunmen attacked the convoy heading to the Shiite villages, setting a number of the buses on fire.
Videos posted online showed gunmen near the buses shouting “God is great” and using derogatory terms for Shiites.Videos posted online showed gunmen near the buses shouting “God is great” and using derogatory terms for Shiites.
After the buses heading to the Shiite villages were burned, and a driver killed, according to Mr. Egeland, pro-government forces prevented buses from leaving eastern Aleppo, according to residents reached inside the neighborhood.
A resident of eastern Aleppo reached by phone said that he had been waiting for hours on a packed bus to leave the neighborhood, but that the government checkpoint would not let them pass.
“This is the third time I have tried to leave,” said the resident, who gave only his first name, Saleh, for safety reasons. “There is a sense of fear among the people here.”