This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/dec/23/queen-theresa-may-brexit-britain-eu
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 1 | Version 2 |
|---|---|
| Even when she’s talking to the Queen, Theresa May keeps ma’am on Brexit | |
| (35 minutes later) | |
| In the introduction to his brilliant play The Audience, Peter Morgan writes that by dramatising the relationship between the Queen and her prime ministers “one was dealing with the British constitution, the bone structure of our establishment in its most elemental form”. | In the introduction to his brilliant play The Audience, Peter Morgan writes that by dramatising the relationship between the Queen and her prime ministers “one was dealing with the British constitution, the bone structure of our establishment in its most elemental form”. |
| This is why it is so intriguing to read in Friday’s Times of Her Majesty’s alleged frustration that Theresa May declined to share her plans for Brexit during a stay at Balmoral in September. Naturally, No 10 and Buckingham Palace have refused to comment, and one must always treat reports of the Queen’s private opinions with due caution. Only six months ago, both sides in the referendum were claiming her support, with evidence of varying quality. | This is why it is so intriguing to read in Friday’s Times of Her Majesty’s alleged frustration that Theresa May declined to share her plans for Brexit during a stay at Balmoral in September. Naturally, No 10 and Buckingham Palace have refused to comment, and one must always treat reports of the Queen’s private opinions with due caution. Only six months ago, both sides in the referendum were claiming her support, with evidence of varying quality. |
| Yet it would be odd indeed if the constitutional monarch had not asked May about her blueprint for Britain’s departure from the EU, which will, in principle, restore full sovereignty to the Queen in Parliament, that composite entity in our system that merges what Walter Bagehot called its “dignified” and “efficient” elements. | Yet it would be odd indeed if the constitutional monarch had not asked May about her blueprint for Britain’s departure from the EU, which will, in principle, restore full sovereignty to the Queen in Parliament, that composite entity in our system that merges what Walter Bagehot called its “dignified” and “efficient” elements. |
| It is hard not to admire May for her consistency … Her reticence may be infuriating, but it is absolutely democratic | It is hard not to admire May for her consistency … Her reticence may be infuriating, but it is absolutely democratic |
| The conversations that take place between HMQ and the prime minister – formal or otherwise – are the sanctum sanctorum of British government. Politicians who let slip what she has said (as David Cameron did when he remarked that the Queen had “purred down the line” over the Scots’ vote against independence in 2014) can expect to be put on the royal naughty step. She herself reveals nothing of these discussions. Had the PM been so minded, she could have confided her plan in fine-print detail to the Queen without fear of the corgis talking out of school. | The conversations that take place between HMQ and the prime minister – formal or otherwise – are the sanctum sanctorum of British government. Politicians who let slip what she has said (as David Cameron did when he remarked that the Queen had “purred down the line” over the Scots’ vote against independence in 2014) can expect to be put on the royal naughty step. She herself reveals nothing of these discussions. Had the PM been so minded, she could have confided her plan in fine-print detail to the Queen without fear of the corgis talking out of school. |
| More to the point, to quote Bagehot again, the monarch has “the right to be consulted, the right to encourage, the right to warn”. So it was not unreasonable of the Queen to signal some interest in May’s proposals for the greatest institutional shake-up in the UK since – well, since the 1972 Treaty of Accession. | More to the point, to quote Bagehot again, the monarch has “the right to be consulted, the right to encourage, the right to warn”. So it was not unreasonable of the Queen to signal some interest in May’s proposals for the greatest institutional shake-up in the UK since – well, since the 1972 Treaty of Accession. |
| Yet this prime minister is the least garrulous and most cautious in living memory: she makes the sphinx-like Ted Heath look like Les Dawson gossiping over the garden fence. Journalists have been driven spare by her refusal to shift from the holding line that she will get the “best possible deal for Britain” – as if she might seek anything else. There will, she and her cabinet colleagues insist, be “no running commentary”. | Yet this prime minister is the least garrulous and most cautious in living memory: she makes the sphinx-like Ted Heath look like Les Dawson gossiping over the garden fence. Journalists have been driven spare by her refusal to shift from the holding line that she will get the “best possible deal for Britain” – as if she might seek anything else. There will, she and her cabinet colleagues insist, be “no running commentary”. |
| This week she gave away nothing to the Commons liaison committee, other than the promise of a speech in the new year. As one of her closest allies tells me: “They can all ask the question as many ways as they like, as often as they like. She’ll give them the same answer. It doesn’t bother her in the slightest.” | This week she gave away nothing to the Commons liaison committee, other than the promise of a speech in the new year. As one of her closest allies tells me: “They can all ask the question as many ways as they like, as often as they like. She’ll give them the same answer. It doesn’t bother her in the slightest.” |
| Whether this strategy will prove resilient is another matter. The PM has already conceded that MPs will have a say on the triggering of article 50. Parliamentary pressure will only grow for her to release further details of a plan that will, after all, decide Britain’s future role in the world. | Whether this strategy will prove resilient is another matter. The PM has already conceded that MPs will have a say on the triggering of article 50. Parliamentary pressure will only grow for her to release further details of a plan that will, after all, decide Britain’s future role in the world. |
| All the same, it is hard not to admire May for her consistency. She stays mum with political journalists. She won’t let on when pressed by MPs. And – it now appears – she even stays stumm when staying with the Queen. | All the same, it is hard not to admire May for her consistency. She stays mum with political journalists. She won’t let on when pressed by MPs. And – it now appears – she even stays stumm when staying with the Queen. |
| It must have crossed her mind that this particular monarch’s first prime minister was Winston Churchill. That alone would be intimidating to most politicians, and encourage them to share their greatest political secrets with the sovereign who has seen and heard it all. | It must have crossed her mind that this particular monarch’s first prime minister was Winston Churchill. That alone would be intimidating to most politicians, and encourage them to share their greatest political secrets with the sovereign who has seen and heard it all. |
| But not, it seems, Theresa May. Her reticence may be infuriating, but it is absolutely democratic. Brexit means Brexit, she declares. But what does that mean? We must keep guessing, it seems. Not even the Queen knows. | But not, it seems, Theresa May. Her reticence may be infuriating, but it is absolutely democratic. Brexit means Brexit, she declares. But what does that mean? We must keep guessing, it seems. Not even the Queen knows. |