This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/stage/2016/dec/25/lets-put-the-pure-back-into-pantomime
The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| Let’s put the pure back into pantomime Let’s put the pure back into pantomime | |
| (about 2 hours later) | |
| Thank you, Michael Billington, for your timely warning against “the filthiest panto” you’ve ever seen (Julian Clary unleashes a tsunami of smut in eye-popping gag-fest, 22 December). But what makes it a show for “highly sophisticated” grown-ups? What is sophisticated about “a tsunami of smut” being unable to get beyond crude lavatory “humour” and taking over that most quintessential of Christmas family entertainments to which we all used to be able to go with our children, parents and grandparents, knowing everyone would be able to enjoy it – the pantomime? I’m no prude, but I am sick to death of gimcrack TV “celebs” being allowed, even encouraged, irresponsibly to hijack our children’s airwaves, screens and stages. Why can’t we allow children to be children? I want my young grandchildren to enjoy with me the sheer fun of panto, the outrageous costumes, stock characters, dancing and singing, spectacular scenery, audience interaction, jokes – both scripted and visual – they can understand and paper-thin plots. The historic stylised cross-dressing of dames and principal boy is comedy: children of all genders dress up, cross-dress, enjoy it when adults do so too, and love and laugh at extravagant exaggeration. | Thank you, Michael Billington, for your timely warning against “the filthiest panto” you’ve ever seen (Julian Clary unleashes a tsunami of smut in eye-popping gag-fest, 22 December). But what makes it a show for “highly sophisticated” grown-ups? What is sophisticated about “a tsunami of smut” being unable to get beyond crude lavatory “humour” and taking over that most quintessential of Christmas family entertainments to which we all used to be able to go with our children, parents and grandparents, knowing everyone would be able to enjoy it – the pantomime? I’m no prude, but I am sick to death of gimcrack TV “celebs” being allowed, even encouraged, irresponsibly to hijack our children’s airwaves, screens and stages. Why can’t we allow children to be children? I want my young grandchildren to enjoy with me the sheer fun of panto, the outrageous costumes, stock characters, dancing and singing, spectacular scenery, audience interaction, jokes – both scripted and visual – they can understand and paper-thin plots. The historic stylised cross-dressing of dames and principal boy is comedy: children of all genders dress up, cross-dress, enjoy it when adults do so too, and love and laugh at extravagant exaggeration. |
| Quality pantomime can be wonderful. But what you describe is something quite other and, I would suggest, even sinister in the way it has doused what used to be all-age family entertainment with ill-disguised ordure.Anne JohnsDerby | Quality pantomime can be wonderful. But what you describe is something quite other and, I would suggest, even sinister in the way it has doused what used to be all-age family entertainment with ill-disguised ordure.Anne JohnsDerby |
| • Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com | • Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com |
| • Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters | • Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters |