This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/law/2016/dec/28/no-time-for-homes-under-the-hammer
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 1 | Version 2 |
|---|---|
| No time for Homes under the Hammer | |
| (35 minutes later) | |
| Part 1 of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act, for which the Tories and the Lib Dems were equally responsible, was arguably the worst piece of legislation in the coalition years, and not just for family law (Letters, 28 December). Social welfare law was almost destroyed too. It is ironic that but for a tied vote in the Lords, the government would have been forced to modify its legal aid domestic violence policy. I agree that the justice select committee report was woefully uncritical. Even now the government refuses to review this shocking mistake.Willy BachLabour shadow justice minister in the Lords 2010- 12, House of Lords | Part 1 of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act, for which the Tories and the Lib Dems were equally responsible, was arguably the worst piece of legislation in the coalition years, and not just for family law (Letters, 28 December). Social welfare law was almost destroyed too. It is ironic that but for a tied vote in the Lords, the government would have been forced to modify its legal aid domestic violence policy. I agree that the justice select committee report was woefully uncritical. Even now the government refuses to review this shocking mistake.Willy BachLabour shadow justice minister in the Lords 2010- 12, House of Lords |
| • I have a great deal of sympathy with your new reader Don Abbey and his bafflement as to why your TV listings only begin at 6pm (Letters, 27 December). He will soon learn that your readers have no capacity to watch daytime TV due to the demands of your supposedly “Quick Crossword”, which regularly takes up to eight man hours to complete. Watching Homes under the Hammer is something of a rare treat.Jane Moth Snettisham, Norfolk | • I have a great deal of sympathy with your new reader Don Abbey and his bafflement as to why your TV listings only begin at 6pm (Letters, 27 December). He will soon learn that your readers have no capacity to watch daytime TV due to the demands of your supposedly “Quick Crossword”, which regularly takes up to eight man hours to complete. Watching Homes under the Hammer is something of a rare treat.Jane Moth Snettisham, Norfolk |
| • Kit Hill asks if Trump’s enthusiasm for a nuclear arsenal makes him a terrorist (Letters, 28 December)? Has he forgotten the standard definition of a terrorist: someone with a bomb but without an air force?George SchlesingerDurham | • Kit Hill asks if Trump’s enthusiasm for a nuclear arsenal makes him a terrorist (Letters, 28 December)? Has he forgotten the standard definition of a terrorist: someone with a bomb but without an air force?George SchlesingerDurham |
| • Why is there only one Competition and Markets Authority (Letters, 28 December)? The same reason there’s only one word for thesaurus. Judith FlandersLondon | • Why is there only one Competition and Markets Authority (Letters, 28 December)? The same reason there’s only one word for thesaurus. Judith FlandersLondon |
| • Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com | • Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com |
| • Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters | • Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters |