This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk/7456216.stm

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
UK hacker's case before Law Lords Law Lords consider UK hacker case
(2 days later)
A Briton is taking his fight against US extradition for allegedly carrying out the "biggest military computer hack of all time" to the House of Lords. Extraditing a Briton accused of the "biggest military computer hack of all time" to the US would be an abuse of proceedings, the law lords have heard.
Glasgow-born Gary McKinnon, a systems analyst, is accused of gaining access to 97 US military and Nasa computers from his north London home. Lawyers for Glasgow-born Gary McKinnon told the House of Lords US authorities had warned him he faced a long jail sentence if he did not plead guilty.
The systems analyst is accused of gaining access to 97 US military and Nasa computers from his London home.
Known as Solo, he was arrested in 2002 but never charged in the UK.Known as Solo, he was arrested in 2002 but never charged in the UK.
Ex-Home Secretary John Reid granted the extradition request but lawyers argue the move would breach his human rights. John Reid, home secretary at the time, granted the US extradition request.
Mr McKinnon's legal team argued at the High Court in London in 2007 that he was subjected to "improper threats". His lawyers told London's High Court last year that he was subject to improper threats and extradition would breach his human rights.
If extradited, they said, he would face an unknown length of time in pre-trial detention, with no likelihood of bail. Two judges found no grounds for appeal.
They argued he would face a long - about 45-year - prison sentence, and might not be allowed to serve part of it in the UK. 'Longer sentence'
But two High Court judges said they could find no grounds for appeal. At the House of Lords on Monday, David Pannick QC, representing Mr McKinnon, said US authorities had warned his client he faced a life sentence rather than a couple of years in jail unless he agreed to plead guilty and to extradition.
The Law Lords will examine alleged threats by US authorities, including one by New Jersey prosecutors that Mr McKinnon "would fry". Without co-operation, the case could be treated as a terrorism case, which could result in up to a 60-year sentence in a maximum security prison should he be found guilty on all six indictments.
He has never denied accessing the computer networks between February 2001 and March 2002. With co-operation, he would receive a lesser sentence of 37 to 46 months, be repatriated to the UK, where he could be released on parole and charges of "significantly damaging national security" would be dropped.
Mr McKinnon has always maintained he was motivated by curiosity and only managed to get into the networks because of lax security. A US embassy legal official quoted New Jersey authorities saying they wanted to see him "fry".
'No threat'
Mr Pannick said it was not disputed that the courts could refuse to extradite people if they considered there had been an abuse of process.
Mr McKinnon has never denied accessing the computer networks between February 2001 and March 2002.
He said he was motivated by curiosity and only managed to get into the networks because of lax security.
Clare Montgomery QC, representing the Home Secretary, argues no threats were made, and the extradition should go ahead.
Judgment is expected within three weeks.