This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jan/04/simon-schuster-alt-right-hate-breitbart-milo-yiannopoulos
The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| Simon & Schuster is aiding hate speech. My magazine will have no part of this | |
| (35 minutes later) | |
| Last week, the literary world gasped when one of the largest publishers in the United States, Simon & Schuster, rewarded America’s most infamous internet troll, Milo Yiannopoulos, with a $250,000 book deal. But we probably should have seen it coming. After all, 2016 taught us that ridiculing women, people of colour, Muslims and members of the LGBTQ community can make someone immensely popular. | Last week, the literary world gasped when one of the largest publishers in the United States, Simon & Schuster, rewarded America’s most infamous internet troll, Milo Yiannopoulos, with a $250,000 book deal. But we probably should have seen it coming. After all, 2016 taught us that ridiculing women, people of colour, Muslims and members of the LGBTQ community can make someone immensely popular. |
| For Simon & Schuster, it can also be immensely profitable. During Yiannopoulos’s tenure at Breitbart.com – where he’s told gay people to “get back in the closet” and women to “log off” the internet – he has amassed more than 1 million followers on Facebook, the kind of author platform that every publisher dreams of. Threshold Editions, the Simon & Schuster imprint dedicated to “innovative ideas of contemporary conservatism”, surely has a hit on their hands. | For Simon & Schuster, it can also be immensely profitable. During Yiannopoulos’s tenure at Breitbart.com – where he’s told gay people to “get back in the closet” and women to “log off” the internet – he has amassed more than 1 million followers on Facebook, the kind of author platform that every publisher dreams of. Threshold Editions, the Simon & Schuster imprint dedicated to “innovative ideas of contemporary conservatism”, surely has a hit on their hands. |
| But Milo is not a conservative intellectual leader with a political agenda. He’s a clickbait grifter who has made a name for himself by spewing hate speech. As the editor-in-chief of a small literary review, I wanted Simon & Schuster to know that broadcasting his rhetoric would have real-world consequences. So I made a decision that has nothing to do with political ideology and everything to do with human rights and decency: the Chicago Review of Books will not cover a single Simon & Schuster book in 2017. | But Milo is not a conservative intellectual leader with a political agenda. He’s a clickbait grifter who has made a name for himself by spewing hate speech. As the editor-in-chief of a small literary review, I wanted Simon & Schuster to know that broadcasting his rhetoric would have real-world consequences. So I made a decision that has nothing to do with political ideology and everything to do with human rights and decency: the Chicago Review of Books will not cover a single Simon & Schuster book in 2017. |
| According to thousands of Twitter and Facebook users, our editorial stance is equivalent to censorship, fascism and book-burning. By choosing not to review Simon & Schuster books for a year, they claim we’re contradicting both the first amendment and our own mission to cover “diverse voices”. In response, they’ve photoshopped my head onto a Nazi soldier, posted my photo with the caption “WARNING! This man was just accused of molesting young children!” and expressed their hope that the next wave of Chicago shootings might “take out” some of our editors. | According to thousands of Twitter and Facebook users, our editorial stance is equivalent to censorship, fascism and book-burning. By choosing not to review Simon & Schuster books for a year, they claim we’re contradicting both the first amendment and our own mission to cover “diverse voices”. In response, they’ve photoshopped my head onto a Nazi soldier, posted my photo with the caption “WARNING! This man was just accused of molesting young children!” and expressed their hope that the next wave of Chicago shootings might “take out” some of our editors. |
| But we aren’t infringing upon Yiannopoulos’ or Simon & Schuster’s free speech. Yiannopoulos has the constitutional right to say whatever he wants. He can call Leslie Jones a “black dude” who is “barely literate”. He can call Melissa McCarthy, Kristen Wiig and Kate McKinnon “fat” and “ugly”. He can call transgender people “mentally ill” and “retarded,” and mock a transgender student during a speech at her own school (“The way that you know he’s failing is I’d almost still bang him.”). | But we aren’t infringing upon Yiannopoulos’ or Simon & Schuster’s free speech. Yiannopoulos has the constitutional right to say whatever he wants. He can call Leslie Jones a “black dude” who is “barely literate”. He can call Melissa McCarthy, Kristen Wiig and Kate McKinnon “fat” and “ugly”. He can call transgender people “mentally ill” and “retarded,” and mock a transgender student during a speech at her own school (“The way that you know he’s failing is I’d almost still bang him.”). |
| And of course, Simon & Schuster has every right to increase Yiannopoulos’s platform by publishing his book. However, free speech doesn’t protect anyone from repercussions in a free market. The literary community – and society at large – has the freedom to respond in kind. That’s why the UK division of Simon & Schuster has decided not to publish Yiannopoulos’s book. It’s why some professionals, such as author Danielle Henderson and audiobook producer Emmett Plant, are reconsidering their relationships with the publisher. And it’s why the Chicago Review of Books would rather give the 15 articles we spent on Simon & Schuster titles last year to independent presses and historically marginalised voices in 2017. | And of course, Simon & Schuster has every right to increase Yiannopoulos’s platform by publishing his book. However, free speech doesn’t protect anyone from repercussions in a free market. The literary community – and society at large – has the freedom to respond in kind. That’s why the UK division of Simon & Schuster has decided not to publish Yiannopoulos’s book. It’s why some professionals, such as author Danielle Henderson and audiobook producer Emmett Plant, are reconsidering their relationships with the publisher. And it’s why the Chicago Review of Books would rather give the 15 articles we spent on Simon & Schuster titles last year to independent presses and historically marginalised voices in 2017. |
| Of course, some writers, editors and publicists have rightly pointed out that our decision isn’t fair to hundreds of other Simon & Schuster authors who had nothing to do with the publisher’s decision to sign Yiannopoulos. I agree. It’s unfair. Simon & Schuster will publish some wonderful books in 2017 through imprints I admire, such as 37 Ink, Salaam Reads and Touchstone. But I strongly believe the literary community must hold the publisher accountable for normalising and amplifying Yiannopoulos’s hate speech. | Of course, some writers, editors and publicists have rightly pointed out that our decision isn’t fair to hundreds of other Simon & Schuster authors who had nothing to do with the publisher’s decision to sign Yiannopoulos. I agree. It’s unfair. Simon & Schuster will publish some wonderful books in 2017 through imprints I admire, such as 37 Ink, Salaam Reads and Touchstone. But I strongly believe the literary community must hold the publisher accountable for normalising and amplifying Yiannopoulos’s hate speech. |
| Why? Because rhetoric like his – which specifically targets racial, religious and cultural minorities – invites discrimination. It arguably encourages people such as Omar Mateen and Dylann Roof to think of entire groups of people as less than human. And in his 2012 book The Harm in Hate Speech, legal philosopher Jeremy Waldron writes that hate speech also sends a clear message to its victims: “Don’t be fooled into thinking you are welcome here. The society around you may seem hospitable and non-discriminatory, but the truth is that you are not wanted, and you and your families will be shunned, excluded, beaten, and driven out, whenever we can get away with it.” | Why? Because rhetoric like his – which specifically targets racial, religious and cultural minorities – invites discrimination. It arguably encourages people such as Omar Mateen and Dylann Roof to think of entire groups of people as less than human. And in his 2012 book The Harm in Hate Speech, legal philosopher Jeremy Waldron writes that hate speech also sends a clear message to its victims: “Don’t be fooled into thinking you are welcome here. The society around you may seem hospitable and non-discriminatory, but the truth is that you are not wanted, and you and your families will be shunned, excluded, beaten, and driven out, whenever we can get away with it.” |
| In a statement last week, Simon & Schuster responded to the controversy by assuring readers that they “do not and never have condoned discrimination or hate speech in any form”. But how is handing a known purveyor of hate speech a $250,000 megaphone not condoning his rhetoric? And as an editor and a book critic, how is giving Simon & Schuster free publicity not condoning their decision? | In a statement last week, Simon & Schuster responded to the controversy by assuring readers that they “do not and never have condoned discrimination or hate speech in any form”. But how is handing a known purveyor of hate speech a $250,000 megaphone not condoning his rhetoric? And as an editor and a book critic, how is giving Simon & Schuster free publicity not condoning their decision? |
| After the Chicago Review of Books attracted so much attention for our stance on the issue, and writers smarter and more talented than me asked us to reconsider, I lost some sleep. But on Saturday, when the biographer of a lesbian artist criticised Simon & Schuster, Yiannopoulos responded: “There is only one place for lesbians: porn.” | After the Chicago Review of Books attracted so much attention for our stance on the issue, and writers smarter and more talented than me asked us to reconsider, I lost some sleep. But on Saturday, when the biographer of a lesbian artist criticised Simon & Schuster, Yiannopoulos responded: “There is only one place for lesbians: porn.” |
| I remain convinced that to protect the long-suffering victims of discrimination from its traumatic and sometimes deadly consequences, the literary community must stand united against anyone – author or publisher – who peddles hate speech for profit. | I remain convinced that to protect the long-suffering victims of discrimination from its traumatic and sometimes deadly consequences, the literary community must stand united against anyone – author or publisher – who peddles hate speech for profit. |