This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/18/us/politics/confirmation-hearing-cabinet.html

The article has changed 13 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 6 Version 7
Price: ‘Nobody’s Interested in Pulling the Rug Out’ on Health Coverage Price: ‘Nobody’s Interested in Pulling the Rug Out’ on Health Coverage
(about 2 hours later)
Right Now: Four hearings for President-elect Donald J. Trump’s cabinet nominees are underway in Washington, including two of the most contentious choices. Right Now: President Obama is addressing the press corps for the last time from the White House. Follow our live coverage and analysis.
■ Representative Tom Price of Georgia, the nominee for health and human services secretary, said Americans will not suddenly lose their health insurance.■ Representative Tom Price of Georgia, the nominee for health and human services secretary, said Americans will not suddenly lose their health insurance.
■ Scott Pruitt, Mr. Trump’s selection to lead the Environmental Protection Agency, said he would return the agency to “common sense” regulation.■ Scott Pruitt, Mr. Trump’s selection to lead the Environmental Protection Agency, said he would return the agency to “common sense” regulation.
■ Wilbur Ross, the nominee for commerce secretary, echoed Mr. Trump’s line that China is protectionist on trade. ■ Wilbur Ross, the nominee for commerce secretary, acknowledged that he employed an undocumented household employee.
■ Gov. Nikki Haley, nominated to be ambassador to the United Nations, says no to a Muslim registry.■ Gov. Nikki Haley, nominated to be ambassador to the United Nations, says no to a Muslim registry.
Mr. Price was quick to offer a reassurance that the Republican effort to repeal the Affordable Care Act would not leave millions of people suddenly without health insurance, echoing other Republicans who have tried to soothe anxieties over the swift march toward repeal.Mr. Price was quick to offer a reassurance that the Republican effort to repeal the Affordable Care Act would not leave millions of people suddenly without health insurance, echoing other Republicans who have tried to soothe anxieties over the swift march toward repeal.
“One of the important things that we need to convey to the American people is that nobody’s interested in pulling the rug out from under anybody,” Mr. Price said. “We believe that it’s absolutely imperative that individuals that have health coverage be able to keep health coverage and move, hopefully, to greater choices and opportunities for them to gain the kind of coverage that they want for themselves and for their families.”“One of the important things that we need to convey to the American people is that nobody’s interested in pulling the rug out from under anybody,” Mr. Price said. “We believe that it’s absolutely imperative that individuals that have health coverage be able to keep health coverage and move, hopefully, to greater choices and opportunities for them to gain the kind of coverage that they want for themselves and for their families.”
“I think there’s been a lot of talk about individuals losing health coverage,” Mr. Price added. “That is not our goal nor is it our desire nor is it our plan.”“I think there’s been a lot of talk about individuals losing health coverage,” Mr. Price added. “That is not our goal nor is it our desire nor is it our plan.”
It remains unclear, however, what exactly Mr. Trump’s plan is to repeal and replace the health care law. Mr. Price did not shed much light on that.It remains unclear, however, what exactly Mr. Trump’s plan is to repeal and replace the health care law. Mr. Price did not shed much light on that.
Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont, an independent who ran for president as a Democrat, pressed Mr. Price on whether he viewed health care as “a right.”Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont, an independent who ran for president as a Democrat, pressed Mr. Price on whether he viewed health care as “a right.”
Mr. Price deflected. “We’re a compassionate society,” he said.Mr. Price deflected. “We’re a compassionate society,” he said.
“No, we’re not a compassionate society,” Mr. Sanders shot back, lamenting the United States’ treatment of some of its neediest citizens.“No, we’re not a compassionate society,” Mr. Sanders shot back, lamenting the United States’ treatment of some of its neediest citizens.
Mr. Sanders also parsed Mr. Price’s remark that Americans deserved “access” to high-quality health care. “I have access to buying a $10 million home,” Mr. Sanders said. “I don’t have the money to do that.”Mr. Sanders also parsed Mr. Price’s remark that Americans deserved “access” to high-quality health care. “I have access to buying a $10 million home,” Mr. Sanders said. “I don’t have the money to do that.”
Mr. Price, who has faced intense scrutiny and criticism from Democrats over his stock trades while in Congress, found a defender in Senator Rand Paul, Republican of Kentucky.Mr. Price, who has faced intense scrutiny and criticism from Democrats over his stock trades while in Congress, found a defender in Senator Rand Paul, Republican of Kentucky.
“To question your motives, I think, is insulting,” Mr. Paul said. “To question whether you’re honest is insulting.”“To question your motives, I think, is insulting,” Mr. Paul said. “To question whether you’re honest is insulting.”
Senator Al Franken, Democrat of Minnesota, was skeptical.Senator Al Franken, Democrat of Minnesota, was skeptical.
“I think that our job in this body and in Congress and in government is to avoid the appearance of conflict,” Mr. Franken said. “And boy, you have not done this.”“I think that our job in this body and in Congress and in government is to avoid the appearance of conflict,” Mr. Franken said. “And boy, you have not done this.”
Mr. Price said he was qualified to lead the Department of Health and Human Services because of his experience as a doctor and a legislator. He practiced surgery for about 20 years, served in the Georgia State Senate from 1997 through 2004 and since 2005 has been a member of Congress, serving most recently as chairman of the House Budget Committee. Mr. Price defended himself during later questioning from Senator Christopher S. Murphy, Democrat of Connecticut.
“The fact of the matter is that I have had no conversations with my broker about any political activity at all,” Mr. Price said. “Other than her congratulating me on my election.”
Democrats have made clear their deep discontent with Mr. Price’s nomination.
But one of them, Senator Michael Bennet of Colorado, found a silver lining with the nominee, who happens to be an orthopedic surgeon.
“I have never shown a knee, my knee, to any nominee before Dr. Price came to my office,” Mr. Bennet disclosed when it was his turn at Wednesday’s hearing. “But he gave me some free medical advice and I’m grateful.”
“How you doing?” Mr. Price chimed in, showing a glimpse of his bedside manner.
“It’s terrible, but I’ll talk to you after it’s over,” Mr. Bennet said. “It’s not because of you.”
Mr. Price, like other candidates for cabinet jobs in the Trump administration, will be subject to confirmation by the full Senate.Mr. Price, like other candidates for cabinet jobs in the Trump administration, will be subject to confirmation by the full Senate.
The hearing on Wednesday is being held by the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, headed by Senator Lamar Alexander, Republican of Tennessee. But that panel does not vote on the nomination.The hearing on Wednesday is being held by the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, headed by Senator Lamar Alexander, Republican of Tennessee. But that panel does not vote on the nomination.
Another hearing for Mr. Price has been scheduled for Tuesday by the Senate Finance Committee, which will vote on whether to recommend confirmation. The two committees share authority over issues for which the Health and Human Services Department is responsible.Another hearing for Mr. Price has been scheduled for Tuesday by the Senate Finance Committee, which will vote on whether to recommend confirmation. The two committees share authority over issues for which the Health and Human Services Department is responsible.
Taking a swipe at what he sees as overzealous government regulation, Mr. Pruitt said his “first and primary goal” as administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency would be “to return the agency to that core mission of protecting the American people through common sense and lawful regulations.”Taking a swipe at what he sees as overzealous government regulation, Mr. Pruitt said his “first and primary goal” as administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency would be “to return the agency to that core mission of protecting the American people through common sense and lawful regulations.”
In Oklahoma, he said, he acted on behalf of “hardworking Americans who want to do the right thing by the environment,” including farmers, ranchers, landowners and small-business owners. “But recently they have felt hopeless, subject to a never-ending torrent of new regulations that only a lawyer can understand. They fear the E.P.A., and that just shouldn’t be the case. If confirmed, I will work tirelessly to ensure that the E.P.A. acts lawfully, sensibly and with those hardworking Americans ever in mind.” He said that “farmers, ranchers, landowners and small business owners have recently felt hopeless, subject to a never-ending torrent of new regulations that only a lawyer can understand. They fear the E.P.A., and that just shouldn’t be the case. If confirmed, I will work tirelessly to ensure that the E.P.A. acts lawfully, sensibly and with those hardworking Americans ever in mind.”
Outside the Senate hearing room, environmental protesters were lined up around the corner, preparing to demonstrate. Groups like the Sierra Club, the Moms Clean Air Task Force, and 350.org, which led the protests against the Keystone XL oil pipeline, were also planning street protests outside the Senate building. Senator Ed Markey, Democrat of Massachusetts, had a feisty exchange with Mr. Pruitt over climate change and ethics. Mr. Markey started out by showing a bit of daylight between the positions of Donald Trump and Scott Pruitt on climate change. Mr. Markey noted that Mr. Trump has called climate change a hoax created by “the Chinese."”
Sen. Jeff Merkley, Democrat of Oregon, grilled Mr. Pruitt over methane, the main component of natural gas. After getting Mr. Pruitt to acknowledge that methane is a powerful greenhouse gas and that he is “concerned” about it, Mr. Merkley introduced a letter from Mr. Pruitt to the E.P.A. protesting the agency’s methane rules. Mr. Markey asked whether Mr. Pruitt agreed with the president elect on that point.
That letter, and others, were written by lawyers for Devon Energy, a major gas producer. Those letters can be read here; they came to light because of articles by Eric Lipton of The New York Times about the influence of energy companies with state officials. You can read the story that focused on Mr. Pruitt here. Mr. Pruitt replied, “I do not believe that climate change is a hoax.” Mr. Markey responded, “O.K., that’s important for the president to hear.”
You can watch the confirmation hearing for Mr. Pruitt live here, at the website for the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee. Then Mr. Markey upped the pressure. He noted that Mr. Pruitt has sued the E.P.A. more than a dozen times, and asked whether he would recuse himself from E.P.A. actions that he had fought as a party to lawsuits. Mr. Pruitt said that he would consider recusing himself if advised to do so by the agency’s own ethics counsel.
Without a commitment to recusal, Mr. Markey argued, “it’s not just the fox guarding the henhouse — it’s the fox destroying the henhouse.” He called the issue “a fundamental conflict of interest.”
Senator Kamala Harris, Democrat of California, a new member and a former state attorney general herself, zinged Mr. Pruitt on his nomination.
She noted that of Mr. Pruitt’s 14 lawsuits, six had failed in federal court, and asked, “I hear you are a lover of baseball. What was your batting average?” Mr. Pruitt said, “It was nearly about .300, which is good for a second baseman.” But Ms. Harris shot back, “My calculation is it’s .142.”
Senator Joni Ernst of Iowa, like other Republican members of committee, provided generally supportive comments and questions that allowed Mr. Pruitt to state talking points without interruption.
She asked him about the controversial “Waters of the U.S.” rule, stating that environmental groups have tried to say that people who have concerns about the rule “are somehow in favor of dirty water, which is absolutely ridiculous.”
In response, he said he rejected the notion that “if you’re pro-energy you’re anti-environment,” and added, “We have shown for decades that we can grow our economy and be a good steward of our air, land and water — we need to get back to that.”
Jonathan Levy, formerly the deputy chief of staff to Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz, sent The Times a note pointing out that this point of view has been expressed by President Obama, most recently in his article in the journal Science, where he noted that “evidence that economies can grow while emissions do not is emerging around the world.”
Gov. Nikki Haley of South Carolina, the nominee for United States ambassador to the United Nations, was the subject of rather mild questioning, but that did not mean the hearing was substance-free.Gov. Nikki Haley of South Carolina, the nominee for United States ambassador to the United Nations, was the subject of rather mild questioning, but that did not mean the hearing was substance-free.
“I am concerned with your lack of foreign policy experience,” said Senator Ben Cardin, Democrat of Maryland and the ranking Democrat on the Foreign Relations Committee. But he then praised Ms. Haley for leading the fight to take down a Confederate battle flag from the South Carolina statehouse property. This seemed to signal: We will be tough on you, but maybe not that tough.“I am concerned with your lack of foreign policy experience,” said Senator Ben Cardin, Democrat of Maryland and the ranking Democrat on the Foreign Relations Committee. But he then praised Ms. Haley for leading the fight to take down a Confederate battle flag from the South Carolina statehouse property. This seemed to signal: We will be tough on you, but maybe not that tough.
For her part, Ms. Haley pivoted to an issue of central concern to Republicans, and many Democrats: the United Nations’ relationship with Israel.For her part, Ms. Haley pivoted to an issue of central concern to Republicans, and many Democrats: the United Nations’ relationship with Israel.
“Any honest assessment also finds an institution that is often at odds with U.S. interests,” Ms. Haley said, noting the body’s 20 resolutions against Israel, more than against Syria, Iran and North Korea. “This cannot continue,” she said, also criticizing the United States’ abstention from the latest such resolution against Israel.“Any honest assessment also finds an institution that is often at odds with U.S. interests,” Ms. Haley said, noting the body’s 20 resolutions against Israel, more than against Syria, Iran and North Korea. “This cannot continue,” she said, also criticizing the United States’ abstention from the latest such resolution against Israel.
“I will never abstain when the United Nations takes any action that comes in direct conflict with the interests and values of the United States,” she said. Also, noting the United States’ contributions to the United Nations, she asked, “Are we getting what we pay for?”“I will never abstain when the United Nations takes any action that comes in direct conflict with the interests and values of the United States,” she said. Also, noting the United States’ contributions to the United Nations, she asked, “Are we getting what we pay for?”
She was asked whether she agreed with sanctions on Russia. “I think that Russia has to have positive actions before we lift any sanctions on Russia.” She hedged on additional sanctions, however, as some in the Senate have sought, noting she needed to talk to the incoming Trump administration.She was asked whether she agreed with sanctions on Russia. “I think that Russia has to have positive actions before we lift any sanctions on Russia.” She hedged on additional sanctions, however, as some in the Senate have sought, noting she needed to talk to the incoming Trump administration.
What about a Muslim registry? Nope, Ms. Haley said, not going to happen.What about a Muslim registry? Nope, Ms. Haley said, not going to happen.
Senator Tim Kaine, Democrat of Virginia, offered the first really rough line of questions for Ms. Haley, calling her interpretation of the Iran nuclear weapons program “completely inaccurate” and encouraging her to “read the agreement.”
She responded, “What we all need to remember is that a nuclear Iran is very dangerous for the entire world.”
Wilbur Ross, a billionaire investor who is Mr. Trump’s pick for commerce secretary, kicked off his confirmation hearing by taking a tough stance on China. He described the country as protectionist, with high barriers to trade.Wilbur Ross, a billionaire investor who is Mr. Trump’s pick for commerce secretary, kicked off his confirmation hearing by taking a tough stance on China. He described the country as protectionist, with high barriers to trade.
“They talk much more about free trade than they actually practice,” he said. “We would like to levelize that playing field and bring the reality closer to the rhetoric.”“They talk much more about free trade than they actually practice,” he said. “We would like to levelize that playing field and bring the reality closer to the rhetoric.”
Mr. Ross’s stance echoed Mr. Trump’s own hard-line approach. The president-elect rankled many by accepting a congratulatory phone call from the president of Taiwan, challenging the long-acknowledged One China principle and heightening tensions with the country before he even takes office.Mr. Ross’s stance echoed Mr. Trump’s own hard-line approach. The president-elect rankled many by accepting a congratulatory phone call from the president of Taiwan, challenging the long-acknowledged One China principle and heightening tensions with the country before he even takes office.
In an unexpected revelation, Mr. Ross admitted he had unknowingly employed an undocumented household worker, a fact he said he discovered while preparing for his Senate confirmation process.
Mr. Ross said the employee had presented a Social Security card and a valid driver’s license, both bearing that individual’s name, when hired in 2009. But during a check over the past month, that individual had been unable to provide similar documentation. He fired the employee immediately, he said.
“We did the best that we thought we could do in order to verify the legality of the employment, and it turned out that was incorrect,” Mr. Ross said.
During that approximately seven-year period, Mr. Ross said he paid all applicable taxes without incident on that employee, using the Social Security number he had been given.
Senator John Thune of South Dakota, the committee’s chairman, said Mr. Ross had alerted the panel immediately upon learning that an employee did not have the proper paperwork.
“I want to say, Mr. Ross, thank you for being forthcoming about this particular matter,” Mr. Thune said.
The discussion offered an extra glimpse of the life of Mr. Ross, a billionaire investor: He said he had employed “dozens” of household workers in recent years.
Senator Bill Nelson of Florida, the top Democrat on the Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee, pressed Mr. Ross to make a commitment not to silence the scientists at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, which falls under the purview of the Department of Commerce.Senator Bill Nelson of Florida, the top Democrat on the Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee, pressed Mr. Ross to make a commitment not to silence the scientists at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, which falls under the purview of the Department of Commerce.
Mr. Ross expressed admiration for the NOAA staff, adding that the fact that multiple scientists there have Nobel Prizes is “certainly a measure of their expertise.”Mr. Ross expressed admiration for the NOAA staff, adding that the fact that multiple scientists there have Nobel Prizes is “certainly a measure of their expertise.”
“I support the dissemination of valid information to the public,” he said. “I don’t think that valid information should be concealed.”“I support the dissemination of valid information to the public,” he said. “I don’t think that valid information should be concealed.”
Do you consider data showing sea levels are on the rise “valid information,” Mr. Nelson asked. Mr. Ross demurred, saying he looked forward to the release of a new NOAA report on the Earth’s climate.Do you consider data showing sea levels are on the rise “valid information,” Mr. Nelson asked. Mr. Ross demurred, saying he looked forward to the release of a new NOAA report on the Earth’s climate.
“It’s very hard for me, Senator Nelson, to parse which part of data is what,” he said.“It’s very hard for me, Senator Nelson, to parse which part of data is what,” he said.
In fact, the findings of that report were released almost as Mr. Ross spoke: For the third year in a row, the Earth has reached its highest temperatures on record, indicating that temperatures are heading toward levels that many believe will pose a profound threat to civilization.In fact, the findings of that report were released almost as Mr. Ross spoke: For the third year in a row, the Earth has reached its highest temperatures on record, indicating that temperatures are heading toward levels that many believe will pose a profound threat to civilization.