This article is from the source 'independent' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/easy-jet-fined-50000-french-court-bayonne-refusing-disabled-passenger-board-flight-joseph-etcheveste-a7536616.html

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Easyjet fined £50,000 by French court after refusing to let disabled passenger board flight Easyjet fined £50,000 by French court after refusing to let disabled passenger board flight
(35 minutes later)
Budget airliner Easyjet has been fined more than £50,000 by a French court after it ruled the carrier discriminated against a disabled passenger. Budget airliner Easyjet has been fined more than £50,000 by a French court after it ruled the carrier discriminated against a disabled passenger. 
Easyjet staff refused access to Joseph Etcheveste, 55, who is paralysed, to a flight in Biarritz in July 2010, citing “security” reasons. Easyjet staff refused access to Joseph Etcheveste, 55, who is paralysed, to a flight in Biarritz in July 2010, citing “security” reasons.
Staff also said Mr Etcheveste could not board because he was “unaccompanied”.Staff also said Mr Etcheveste could not board because he was “unaccompanied”.
According to the Guardian, his lawyer, Anne-Marie Mendiboure, said: “EasyJet refused to let my client board because it deemed there were security problems. They still have not been able to explain what they were.”According to the Guardian, his lawyer, Anne-Marie Mendiboure, said: “EasyJet refused to let my client board because it deemed there were security problems. They still have not been able to explain what they were.”
The court in Bayonne. south west France, ruled in Mr Etcheveste's favour and fined the company €60,000 (£52,000).  The court in Bayonne. south west France, ruled in Mr Etcheveste's favour and fined the company €60,000 (£52,000). 
Maud Marian, lawyer for Easyjet, told AFP news agency she was not surprised at the court’s decision and that the carrier was unlikely to appeal. She added that the company “never intended to discriminate against the plaintiff”.Maud Marian, lawyer for Easyjet, told AFP news agency she was not surprised at the court’s decision and that the carrier was unlikely to appeal. She added that the company “never intended to discriminate against the plaintiff”.
A spokesperson for the company told The Independent: “EasyJet accepts the tribunal decision and will not appeal this decision. EasyJet never intended to discriminate against Mr Etcheveste or any other passenger of reduced mobility. This case dates from July 2010 and since then EasyJet has reviewed all stages in our passengers’ journey with us to ensure we make it as easy as we can for all.
“In 2012 EasyJet created an independent committee of European experts (ESAAG – the EasyJet Special Assistance Advisory Group) to provide guidance and advice to the airline.
“EasyJet flies every day more than 1000 passengers requiring special assistance and invests in training its staff to provide assistance for all needs. This includes offering a dedicated special assistance support service in order to identify passenger needs and enhance the quality of their experience at the airport and on-board EasyJet’s aircraft. 
“As a result of all this, our research shows that 87% of EasyJet passengers who require special assistance are satisfied with the services of the airline and that 98% said they would fly with us again – both are at a higher level than EasyJet passengers as a whole.”
Easyjet has previously faced numerous lawsuits by wheelchair users for disability discrimination.Easyjet has previously faced numerous lawsuits by wheelchair users for disability discrimination.
In December 2016, pensioner Dorothy Rostron – who was terminally ill and had a chronic lung condition – was allegedly barred by Easyjet from returning to the UK from a final holiday in Malaga. In December 2016, pensioner Dorothy Rostron – who was terminally ill and had a chronic lung condition – was allegedly barred by Easyjet from returning to the UK from a final holiday in Malaga. 
Ms Rostron claimed she and her family were removed from their flight because her oxygen canisters – which she needed to breathe –  were deemed a “security issue”, the Mirror reported. Ms Rostron claimed she and her family were removed from their flight because her oxygen canisters – which she needed to breathe –  were deemed a “security issue”, the Mirror reported.
The family were left stranded until another airline allowed them to fly back to Manchester. The family were left stranded until another airline allowed them to fly back to Manchester.