This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/24/us/politics/trump-cabinet-hearing-confirmation.html
The article has changed 10 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 5 | Version 6 |
|---|---|
| Trump’s Health Nominee Defends Stock Deals as ‘Ethical, Above Board, Legal and Transparent’ | Trump’s Health Nominee Defends Stock Deals as ‘Ethical, Above Board, Legal and Transparent’ |
| (about 2 hours later) | |
| WASHINGTON — President Trump’s nominees for health secretary and budget director faced withering questions from Democrats over ethics issues, but they still seem likely to win Senate confirmation. | WASHINGTON — President Trump’s nominees for health secretary and budget director faced withering questions from Democrats over ethics issues, but they still seem likely to win Senate confirmation. |
| ■ Mr. Trump’s pick to be secretary of health and human services, Representative Tom Price of Georgia, defended his investments in an Australian pharmaceutical company during his time in Congress. | |
| ■ The president’s choice to be budget director, Representative Mick Mulvaney of South Carolina, said Social Security is not a Ponzi scheme. | |
| ■ Linda E. McMahon, the former chief executive of World Wrestling Entertainment, Mr. Trump’s choice to lead the Small Business Administration, said her entrepreneurial background suits her for the job. | ■ Linda E. McMahon, the former chief executive of World Wrestling Entertainment, Mr. Trump’s choice to lead the Small Business Administration, said her entrepreneurial background suits her for the job. |
| A background investigation of Mr. Price says he understated the value of his investments in an Australian pharmaceutical company, Innate Immunotherapeutics, and claimed income tax deductions that he could not substantiate. | |
| The findings emerged from a review of Mr. Price’s tax returns and other official documents by committee staff members from both parties. | The findings emerged from a review of Mr. Price’s tax returns and other official documents by committee staff members from both parties. |
| In a questionnaire in December, the committee staff said, Mr. Price understated the value of 400,613 shares of the Australian company that he purchased in August 2016 through “a private placement offering.” | In a questionnaire in December, the committee staff said, Mr. Price understated the value of 400,613 shares of the Australian company that he purchased in August 2016 through “a private placement offering.” |
| The value of the shares was listed on the questionnaire at $50,000 to $100,000, but that reflected the purchase price, the staff reported. At the request of the committee, Mr. Price recalculated the value of his holdings, to reflect their market price. The revised value was $100,000 to $250,000. | The value of the shares was listed on the questionnaire at $50,000 to $100,000, but that reflected the purchase price, the staff reported. At the request of the committee, Mr. Price recalculated the value of his holdings, to reflect their market price. The revised value was $100,000 to $250,000. |
| In addition, the committee staff said, Mr. Price “took improper deductions on his 2016 tax returns” for the depreciation of land associated with condominiums that he owns in Washington and in Nashville, Tenn. | In addition, the committee staff said, Mr. Price “took improper deductions on his 2016 tax returns” for the depreciation of land associated with condominiums that he owns in Washington and in Nashville, Tenn. |
| Moreover, the staff said, Mr. Price and his wife, both physicians, claimed “miscellaneous employment deductions totaling $19,034” for various expenses in 2013, 2014 and 2015. | Moreover, the staff said, Mr. Price and his wife, both physicians, claimed “miscellaneous employment deductions totaling $19,034” for various expenses in 2013, 2014 and 2015. |
| Neither Mr. Price nor his wife work as a physician, the staff report said, and “proper documentation could not be located,” so Mr. Price’s tax returns will be amended to remove the $19,034 in deductions. | Neither Mr. Price nor his wife work as a physician, the staff report said, and “proper documentation could not be located,” so Mr. Price’s tax returns will be amended to remove the $19,034 in deductions. |
| Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon, the senior Democrat on the Finance Committee, questioned Mr. Price over his trading in health care stocks during his time in Congress. | |
| “It is hard to see this as anything but a conflict of interest and an abuse of position,” Mr. Wyden said. | |
| In particular, Mr. Wyden pressed Mr. Price over his investments in Innate Immunotherapeutics, which the senator said could be affected by legislation that comes before Congress. | |
| Mr. Price said he had done nothing wrong. | |
| “The reality is that everything that I did was ethical, above board, legal and transparent,” he said. | “The reality is that everything that I did was ethical, above board, legal and transparent,” he said. |
| Just how involved is Mr. Price as the Trump administration plots how it will replace the Affordable Care Act? | Just how involved is Mr. Price as the Trump administration plots how it will replace the Affordable Care Act? |
| Senator Sherrod Brown, Democrat of Ohio, tried to find out. | Senator Sherrod Brown, Democrat of Ohio, tried to find out. |
| “President Trump said he’s working with you on a replacement plan for the A.C.A., which is nearly finished and will be revealed after your confirmation,” Mr. Brown said. “Is that true?” | “President Trump said he’s working with you on a replacement plan for the A.C.A., which is nearly finished and will be revealed after your confirmation,” Mr. Brown said. “Is that true?” |
| “It’s true that he said that, yes,” Mr. Price responded, drawing laughter in the hearing room. | “It’s true that he said that, yes,” Mr. Price responded, drawing laughter in the hearing room. |
| “Not that he’s ever done this before, but did the president lie?” Mr. Brown asked. He added: “I know we don’t use the word lie here because we’re polite when presidents say statements that aren’t true. But did he lie to the public about working with you? | “Not that he’s ever done this before, but did the president lie?” Mr. Brown asked. He added: “I know we don’t use the word lie here because we’re polite when presidents say statements that aren’t true. But did he lie to the public about working with you? |
| “I’ve had conversations with the president about health care, yes,” Mr. Price replied. | “I’ve had conversations with the president about health care, yes,” Mr. Price replied. |
| Senator Orrin G. Hatch, Republican of Utah, lamented “the hyper-politicization of the nomination process.” He said the attacks by Democrats on Mr. Price’s ethics were “specious and distorted.” | Senator Orrin G. Hatch, Republican of Utah, lamented “the hyper-politicization of the nomination process.” He said the attacks by Democrats on Mr. Price’s ethics were “specious and distorted.” |
| He said lawmakers should not “invent new standards for finances, ethics and disclosure that are different from those that have generally applied in the past.” | |
| “None of those who say they oppose Dr. Price’s nomination seem to be talking about whether he is qualified,” Mr. Hatch said. | “None of those who say they oppose Dr. Price’s nomination seem to be talking about whether he is qualified,” Mr. Hatch said. |
| Senator Johnny Isakson, Republican of Georgia, also came to Mr. Price’s defense. “I feel like I’ve been asked to be a character witness in a felony trial in the sentencing phase of a conviction,” he said. He called Mr. Price “an honorable man.” | Senator Johnny Isakson, Republican of Georgia, also came to Mr. Price’s defense. “I feel like I’ve been asked to be a character witness in a felony trial in the sentencing phase of a conviction,” he said. He called Mr. Price “an honorable man.” |
| Mr. Mulvaney said that tackling government waste and reducing debt would be his top priorities if he were confirmed as President Trump’s budget director. | Mr. Mulvaney said that tackling government waste and reducing debt would be his top priorities if he were confirmed as President Trump’s budget director. |
| “I believe, as a matter of principle, that the debt is a problem that must be addressed sooner, rather than later,” Mr. Mulvaney said in prepared remarks to be delivered to the Senate Committee on the Budget. “I also know that fundamental changes are needed in the way Washington spends and taxes if we truly want a healthy economy.” | “I believe, as a matter of principle, that the debt is a problem that must be addressed sooner, rather than later,” Mr. Mulvaney said in prepared remarks to be delivered to the Senate Committee on the Budget. “I also know that fundamental changes are needed in the way Washington spends and taxes if we truly want a healthy economy.” |
| While Mr. Mulvaney is a big believer in spending cuts, he made it clear that he wanted to protect America’s social safety nets. “A strong, healthy economy allows us to protect our most vulnerable,” he said. | While Mr. Mulvaney is a big believer in spending cuts, he made it clear that he wanted to protect America’s social safety nets. “A strong, healthy economy allows us to protect our most vulnerable,” he said. |
| Mr. Mulvaney was asked about his failure to pay nanny taxes in his opening question and promised that it was an innocent mistake. | Mr. Mulvaney was asked about his failure to pay nanny taxes in his opening question and promised that it was an innocent mistake. |
| “In 2000 we had triplets, when we came home we hired someone to help my wife to help take care of the children,” Mr. Mulvaney said. “In my mind she was a babysitter.” | “In 2000 we had triplets, when we came home we hired someone to help my wife to help take care of the children,” Mr. Mulvaney said. “In my mind she was a babysitter.” |
| He added: “I did not consider her a household employee for purposes of withholding.” | He added: “I did not consider her a household employee for purposes of withholding.” |
| The Republican from South Carolina said that he realized his error when filling out a questionnaire related to his nomination to be Mr. Trump’s budget director. He said that he quickly moved to notify his accountant, the president and his colleagues so that he could correct the mistake. | The Republican from South Carolina said that he realized his error when filling out a questionnaire related to his nomination to be Mr. Trump’s budget director. He said that he quickly moved to notify his accountant, the president and his colleagues so that he could correct the mistake. |
| Mr. Mulvaney was forced to address suggestions that he made in the past that Social Security was akin to a Ponzi scheme and he downplayed that characterization. | |
| “I wouldn’t read too much into it as describing it as a Ponzi scheme,” he said, explaining that he was merely referring to the fact that the program takes money from people and gives it to other people. | “I wouldn’t read too much into it as describing it as a Ponzi scheme,” he said, explaining that he was merely referring to the fact that the program takes money from people and gives it to other people. |
| As to keeping the program solvent, Mr. Mulvaney said that he would not recommend cuts that would see current retirees lose benefits. However, he said that he could see raising the age for receiving benefits in the future. | |
| Ms. McMahon presented herself not as the super wealthy former W.W.E. chief executive, but instead as an entrepreneur who has weathered the worst moments of building a business from the ground up. And she emphasized her desire to help others do the same should she be confirmed as head of the Small Business Administration. | |
| Describing how she and her husband built their global business enterprise from an operation so small that they shared a desk, Ms. McMahon spoke of how they fought back from an early bankruptcy filing. | Describing how she and her husband built their global business enterprise from an operation so small that they shared a desk, Ms. McMahon spoke of how they fought back from an early bankruptcy filing. |
| Her testimony provided a stark contrast to the former executive she is today; the McMahons were among Mr. Trump’s biggest campaign donors, having given $6 million to a “super PAC” supporting him last August and September. | Her testimony provided a stark contrast to the former executive she is today; the McMahons were among Mr. Trump’s biggest campaign donors, having given $6 million to a “super PAC” supporting him last August and September. |
| Ms. McMahon said those who own small businesses “need confidence in the economy.” | Ms. McMahon said those who own small businesses “need confidence in the economy.” |
| “Small businesses want to feel they can take a risk on expansion or a new hire without fearing onerous new regulations or unexpected taxes, fees and fines that will make such growth unaffordable,” she said in prepared remarks. “We want to renew optimism in our economy.” | “Small businesses want to feel they can take a risk on expansion or a new hire without fearing onerous new regulations or unexpected taxes, fees and fines that will make such growth unaffordable,” she said in prepared remarks. “We want to renew optimism in our economy.” |
| Ms. McMahon is among Mr. Trump’s more unusual cabinet choices. But unlike several of his other wealthy nominees, she has been in the political arena before, as a candidate. | Ms. McMahon is among Mr. Trump’s more unusual cabinet choices. But unlike several of his other wealthy nominees, she has been in the political arena before, as a candidate. |
| She spent around $100 million on unsuccessful campaigns for a Connecticut seat in the Senate in 2010 and in 2012. | She spent around $100 million on unsuccessful campaigns for a Connecticut seat in the Senate in 2010 and in 2012. |
| But she appears likely to fare better in her latest pursuit of a government post. The two Democrats who defeated her, Senators Richard Blumenthal and Christopher S. Murphy, offered praise for her after Mr. Trump selected her for his administration. | But she appears likely to fare better in her latest pursuit of a government post. The two Democrats who defeated her, Senators Richard Blumenthal and Christopher S. Murphy, offered praise for her after Mr. Trump selected her for his administration. |