This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-38754626

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
RBS puts aside further £3.1bn for US mortgages fine RBS puts aside further £3.1bn for US mortgages fine
(35 minutes later)
Royal Bank of Scotland has set aside a further $3.8bn (£3.1bn) to cover fines in the US, the bank has said.Royal Bank of Scotland has set aside a further $3.8bn (£3.1bn) to cover fines in the US, the bank has said.
The provision is for an expected penalty linked to the bank's role in selling risky mortgages prior to the 2008 financial crisis. The provision is for an expected penalty over the sale of financial products linked to risky mortgages before the 2008 financial crisis.
RBS has now put a total of £6.7bn aside to cover litigation by the US Department of Justice. RBS, which is 72%-owned by the government, has now put £6.7bn aside to cover US litigation.
The latest move will plunge the bank, which is 72%-owned by the taxpayer, further into debt. It means the bank is set to report a loss for 2016, the ninth year in a row that RBS has lost money.
Ross McEwan, RBS's chief executive, said: "Putting our legacy litigation issues behind us, including those relating to US residential mortgage-backed securities, remains a key part of our strategy.
"It is our priority to seek the best outcome for our shareholders, customers and employees."
RBS's potential US penalty could fall anywhere between $12bn and $20bn, experts say.
It remains to be seen whether the new US administration takes a tougher or more lenient approach to misconduct by European banks.
RBS said the "duration and outcome" of the investigations into its mortgage selling activities before 2008 were uncertain - including whether a settlement with the Department of Justice could be reached.
It also said that "further substantial additional provisions and costs may be recognised" and that other "adverse consequences may occur".