This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-38880877

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 3 Version 4
Trump travel ban: States urge retention of temporary block Trump travel ban: States urge retention of temporary block
(about 3 hours later)
Restoring President Donald Trump's ban on immigrants from seven mainly Muslim countries would "unleash chaos again", lawyers for two US states argue.Restoring President Donald Trump's ban on immigrants from seven mainly Muslim countries would "unleash chaos again", lawyers for two US states argue.
Counsel for Washington and Minnesota urged a federal appeals court in San Francisco to maintain its nationwide temporary restraining order.Counsel for Washington and Minnesota urged a federal appeals court in San Francisco to maintain its nationwide temporary restraining order.
They are being backed by technology firms which say the travel ban is harmful to their businesses.They are being backed by technology firms which say the travel ban is harmful to their businesses.
Trump administration lawyers are expected to respond later on Monday.Trump administration lawyers are expected to respond later on Monday.
The restraining order was issued on Friday by a federal judge in Seattle, Washington, suspending Mr Trump's executive order restricting immigration from seven mainly Muslim countries.
Visa holders from Iraq, Syria, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen will be allowed to enter the US until the full case has been heard.
The judge's order received a furious response from Mr Trump, who claims national security is at risk.
Is the US heading for a constitutional crisis?Is the US heading for a constitutional crisis?
Is Trump's immigration order legal?Is Trump's immigration order legal?
Who does travel ban affect?Who does travel ban affect?
World reacts to Trump orderWorld reacts to Trump order
The San Francisco appeals court has already turned down a Department of Justice request to set aside this temporary block, designed to allow the two states time to make their case that the ban is both unconstitutional and harmful to their residents, businesses and universities. Friday's restraining order has led to a furious response from Mr Trump, who claims national security is at risk.
How did we get here?
An executive order by President Trump issued on 25 January saw:
It caused confusion at US and foreign airports when it came into force, and was widely condemned, although polls suggest that US public opinion is sharply divided on the policy.
On Friday the order was suspended by a federal judge in Seattle, James Robart, after the states of Washington and Minnesota took legal action against the travel ban on the grounds that it was unconstitutional and harmful to their interests.
Judge Robart's ruling is designed to allow the two states time to make their case. It suspends the seven-country travel ban, the temporary refugee admissions ban, the reprioritisation of minority religion refugee claims and the ban on Syrian refugees, but the cap on overall US refugee admissions is not suspended.
As a result of the suspension, visa holders from the seven mainly Muslim countries will be allowed to enter the US until the full case has been heard. The state department has been reversing visa cancellations, and US homeland security employees have been told by their department to comply with the ruling.
Many visa-holders have scrambled to get on flights to the US, fearing the window for entry may close.
At the weekend, the appeals court in San Francisco turned down a Department of Justice request to set aside the restraining order.
In its appeal, the department said Judge Robart had overreached by "second-guessing" the president on a national security matter. It also argued that only the president could decide who can enter or stay in the US.
But the court did not agree, leading to a full case hearing and Monday's legal submissions.
What do the ban's detractors say?
Washington and Minnesota argue that as well as being unconstitutional, the travel ban is harmful to their residents, businesses and universities.
Their lawyers told the appeals court that any resumption of the ban "would reinstitute those harms, separating families, stranding our university students and faculty, and barring travel".Their lawyers told the appeals court that any resumption of the ban "would reinstitute those harms, separating families, stranding our university students and faculty, and barring travel".
They added: "Defendants now ask this court to unleash chaos again by staying the district court order. The court should decline."They added: "Defendants now ask this court to unleash chaos again by staying the district court order. The court should decline."
They also lodged a statement by a host of national security officials - including former secretaries of state John Kerry and Madeleine Albright, and former CIA director Leon Panetta - which describes the travel ban as ineffective, dangerous and counterproductive. They also lodged a statement signed by a host of national security officials - including former secretaries of state John Kerry and Madeleine Albright, and former CIA director Leon Panetta - which describes the travel ban as ineffective, dangerous and counterproductive.
Lawyers for tech firms including Apple and Google have also lodged arguments with the court, saying that the travel ban would harm their companies by making it more difficult to recruit employees.Lawyers for tech firms including Apple and Google have also lodged arguments with the court, saying that the travel ban would harm their companies by making it more difficult to recruit employees.
President Trump has attacked the federal judge who originally blocked his travel ban and the judiciary in general, saying Americans should blame the courts "if something happens". How has President Trump responded?
Mr Trump also said he had instructed border officials to check people entering America "very carefully". President Trump has attacked the federal judge in Seattle who originally blocked his travel ban and the judiciary in general, saying Americans should blame the courts "if something happens".
Mr Trump also said he had instructed border officials to carry out rigorous checks.
In a series of tweets on Sunday, Mr Trump said: "I have instructed Homeland Security to check people coming into our country VERY CAREFULLY. The courts are making the job very difficult!"In a series of tweets on Sunday, Mr Trump said: "I have instructed Homeland Security to check people coming into our country VERY CAREFULLY. The courts are making the job very difficult!"
"Just cannot believe a judge would put our country in such peril. If something happens blame him and court system. People pouring in. Bad!""Just cannot believe a judge would put our country in such peril. If something happens blame him and court system. People pouring in. Bad!"
US border checks What is Congress saying?
US federal judge James Robart's ruling on Friday suspends the implementation of elements of President Trump's executive order.
Washington and Minnesota argue that the ban is unconstitutional because it denied people with valid entry documents the right to travel without legal recourse. It also violated freedom of religion rights by appearing to target Muslims, they said.
The ruling suspends:
The cap on overall US refugee admissions this year of 50,000 is not covered by the judge's ruling.
In its appeal, the justice department said Judge Robart had overreached by "second-guessing" the president on a national security matter.
It also argued that only the president could decide who can enter or stay in the US.
Democrats and some Republicans have criticised Mr Trump's comments about the judiciary.Democrats and some Republicans have criticised Mr Trump's comments about the judiciary.
Democratic Senator Patrick Leahy, a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said Mr Trump seemed "intent on precipitating a constitutional crisis".Democratic Senator Patrick Leahy, a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said Mr Trump seemed "intent on precipitating a constitutional crisis".
Meanwhile, Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell told CNN it was "best to avoid criticising judges individually".Meanwhile, Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell told CNN it was "best to avoid criticising judges individually".
Judge Robart has served on the federal bench since 2004 after being nominated by President George W Bush. Judge Robart, who was nominated by Republican President George W Bush, has served on the federal bench since 2004.
Friday's ruling has also seen visa holders from the affected nations scramble to get flights to the US, fearing they have a slim window to enter. US border checks - how they work
The state department has been reversing visa cancellations, and US homeland security employees have been told by their department to comply with the ruling. All persons arriving at a US port of entry are inspected by Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers.
The ban caused confusion at US and foreign airports when it came into force. Visitors must either have valid US visas, or hold "Green Cards" that authorise them to live and work in the US permanently, or have applied for authorisation under the Visa Waiver Program via ESTA (the Electronic System for Travel Authorization) before their visit. Travellers from certain countries can use Automated Passport Control (APC).
Polls suggest that US public opinion is sharply divided on the travel ban. All visitors must complete declaration forms. They may also have their fingerprints and photos taken, as CBP uses biometric technologies to verify travellers' identities.
CBP officers may also ask to inspect luggage or personal items.
Have you had your travel to the US disrupted by the ban? Has Friday's ruling changed your circumstances? Let us know about your experiences. Email haveyoursay@bbc.co.uk with your stories.Have you had your travel to the US disrupted by the ban? Has Friday's ruling changed your circumstances? Let us know about your experiences. Email haveyoursay@bbc.co.uk with your stories.
Please include a contact number if you are willing to speak to a BBC journalist. You can also contact us in the following ways:Please include a contact number if you are willing to speak to a BBC journalist. You can also contact us in the following ways:
·Tweet: @BBC_HaveYourSay·Tweet: @BBC_HaveYourSay
·Send an SMS or MMS to +44 7624 800 100·Send an SMS or MMS to +44 7624 800 100
Or please use the form below:Or please use the form below: