This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/feb/09/explosion-at-flamanville-nuclear-plant-in-western-france

The article has changed 11 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 9 Version 10
France nuclear plant explosion: no risk of contamination, say experts Blast at French nuclear plant does not pose contamination risk, say experts
(35 minutes later)
Authorities have said there is no risk of contamination from an explosion that occurred at EDF’s Flamanville nuclear plant in northern France.Authorities have said there is no risk of contamination from an explosion that occurred at EDF’s Flamanville nuclear plant in northern France.
EDF said the blast at 9.40am on Thursday was caused by a fire in the turbine hall, which is outside the nuclear zones of the power station, located 15 miles west of the port of Cherbourg. Five people were treated for smoke inhalation.EDF said the blast at 9.40am on Thursday was caused by a fire in the turbine hall, which is outside the nuclear zones of the power station, located 15 miles west of the port of Cherbourg. Five people were treated for smoke inhalation.
The nuclear operator said an on-site team brought the fire under control, and the incident was declared over by 11am. One of the plant’s two water-pressurised reactors was shut down after the explosion and remains offline.The nuclear operator said an on-site team brought the fire under control, and the incident was declared over by 11am. One of the plant’s two water-pressurised reactors was shut down after the explosion and remains offline.
The cause of the fire is unknown, though authorities have ruled out sabotage. Experts said the explosion appeared to be a relatively minor event and did not pose a safety risk.The cause of the fire is unknown, though authorities have ruled out sabotage. Experts said the explosion appeared to be a relatively minor event and did not pose a safety risk.
“Though any accident at a nuclear site must be taken seriously, I wouldn’t call this a nuclear accident as there was no release of radioactive material and the reactor was not affected,” said Jim Smith, professor of environmental science at the University of Portsmouth. “There doesn’t appear to be any risk to the general public.”“Though any accident at a nuclear site must be taken seriously, I wouldn’t call this a nuclear accident as there was no release of radioactive material and the reactor was not affected,” said Jim Smith, professor of environmental science at the University of Portsmouth. “There doesn’t appear to be any risk to the general public.”
Mycle Schneider, a Paris-based nuclear consultant, said fires in a nuclear plant were always “bad news” because of side effects such as smoke.Mycle Schneider, a Paris-based nuclear consultant, said fires in a nuclear plant were always “bad news” because of side effects such as smoke.
“However, in this case, the fire had apparently been contained and rather quickly brought under control. I don’t think this was a major event at all.”“However, in this case, the fire had apparently been contained and rather quickly brought under control. I don’t think this was a major event at all.”
Other nuclear experts noted that because of the design of the plant’s reactors, water passing through the turbine would not have gone through the reactor’s core, so it was unlikely there was a radioactive release. “There were no consequences for safety at the plant or for environmental safety,” EDF said in a statement.Other nuclear experts noted that because of the design of the plant’s reactors, water passing through the turbine would not have gone through the reactor’s core, so it was unlikely there was a radioactive release. “There were no consequences for safety at the plant or for environmental safety,” EDF said in a statement.
A new third-generation reactor known as EPR is being built at Flamanville and will be the world’s largest when it goes into operation in late 2018. Construction of the new plant began in 2007 and was initially scheduled for completion in 2012 but has been delayed several times and is over budget.A new third-generation reactor known as EPR is being built at Flamanville and will be the world’s largest when it goes into operation in late 2018. Construction of the new plant began in 2007 and was initially scheduled for completion in 2012 but has been delayed several times and is over budget.
The design of the new reactor is the same as the one planned at Hinkley Point C, which will be the UK’s first new nuclear power station in two decades.The design of the new reactor is the same as the one planned at Hinkley Point C, which will be the UK’s first new nuclear power station in two decades.
Construction is under way at the Somerset site, where EDF has already moved 2.5m cubic metres of earth and begun work on a 500-metre long jetty to bring in the vast majority of materials needed. There are currently 1,200 people working on the project. EDF also hopes to build a second new plant at Sizewell on the Suffolk coast.Construction is under way at the Somerset site, where EDF has already moved 2.5m cubic metres of earth and begun work on a 500-metre long jetty to bring in the vast majority of materials needed. There are currently 1,200 people working on the project. EDF also hopes to build a second new plant at Sizewell on the Suffolk coast.
Nuclear power provides four-fifths of France’s electricity generation, but many of the country’s ageing power stations are expected to close in the 2030s. The reliance on the power stations led to warnings of a risk of power cuts this winter after safety checks forced several of 85% state-owned EDF’s plants offline for tests. Nuclear power provides four-fifths of France’s electricity generation but many of the country’s ageing power stations are expected to close in the 2030s. The reliance on the power stations led to warnings of a risk of power cuts this winter after safety checks forced several of 85% state-owned EDF’s plants offline for tests.
Paul Dorfman, of the Energy Institute at University College London, said the Flamanville blast may be minor but it nonetheless added to the pressure EDF was already under with the inspections. “It’s the cherry on the top of the horrendous time that French nuclear is having,” he said.Paul Dorfman, of the Energy Institute at University College London, said the Flamanville blast may be minor but it nonetheless added to the pressure EDF was already under with the inspections. “It’s the cherry on the top of the horrendous time that French nuclear is having,” he said.
François Hollande’s government passed an energy transition law, which came into effect last year, that encourages a switch to renewable energy sources such as wind and solar, and caps the amount of electricity produced by nuclear power.François Hollande’s government passed an energy transition law, which came into effect last year, that encourages a switch to renewable energy sources such as wind and solar, and caps the amount of electricity produced by nuclear power.
The EDF board recently voted to close the country’s oldest atomic plant in order to stay under that cap and open a new one at Flamanville.The EDF board recently voted to close the country’s oldest atomic plant in order to stay under that cap and open a new one at Flamanville.