This article is from the source 'independent' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/donald-trump-muslim-ban-hawaii-federal-judge-derrick-watson-blocked-executive-order-travel-a7632591.html

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Donald Trump's revised executive order is a Muslim ban, says Hawaii federal judge Donald Trump's revised executive order is a Muslim ban, says Hawaii federal judge
(35 minutes later)
Donald Trump’s new executive order on travel restrictions is a Muslim ban, the judge who blocked the revised order has said. The judge who blocked Donald Trump's revised executive order barring travel from six predominantly Muslim nations has said it "targets Islam". 
Derrick Watson, a district judge in Hawaii, placed a nationwide block on the President’s action to prevent citizens from six Muslim-majority countries from entering the US just hours before it was due to come into effect. Hours before it was due to come into effect, Derrick Watson, a district judge in Hawaii, placed a nationwide block on the President’s action. 
In his ruling, Judge Watson rejected claims by the Trump administration that the ban was not a Muslim ban, because it did not mention religion and was instead focussed on the citizens of specific countries. Rejecting claims by Mr Trump's administration that it was not a "Muslim ban", because it did not mention religion and was instead focussed on the citizens of specific countries, he ruled that "the illogic of the Government’s contentions is palpable."
“A reasonable, objective observer... would conclude that the Executive Order was issued with a purpose to disfavour a particular religion, in spite of its stated, religiously-neutral purpose,” he said. “A reasonable, objective observer... would conclude that the Executive Order was issued with a purpose to disfavour a particular religion, in spite of its stated, religiously-neutral purpose,” he wrote. 
Mr Trump has denied the orders are a Muslim ban. In an interview shortly after his inauguration, he called his plans “extreme vetting”. He added: “It is undisputed, using the primary source upon which the Government itself relies, that these six countries have overwhelmingly Muslim populations that range from 90.7 percent to 99.8 percent," he wrote. "It would therefore be no paradigmatic leap to conclude that targeting these countries likewise targets Islam. Certainly, it would be inappropriate to conclude, as the Government does, that it does not."
He told ABC News: “It’s not the Muslim ban. But it’s countries that have tremendous terror… countries that people are going to come in and cause us tremendous problems.” Mr Trump has denied the orders are a "Muslim ban". Shortly after his inauguration, he called his plans “extreme vetting”.
The President issued a revised travel ban after the first, signed on 27 January, sparked international protests and suffered several legal setbacks from courts who judged it unconstitutional. “It’s not the Muslim ban," he told ABC News. "But it’s countries that have tremendous terror… countries that people are going to come in and cause us tremendous problems.”
He had hoped the new order, which did not involve green card holders and which removed any reference to religion, would be legally more watertight. But activists said the new ban still discriminated, both on the grounds of nationality and indeed religion. The President issued the revised executive order after the first was barred in the courts. 
Judge Watson, who was appointed by former President Barack Obama, was one of three federal judges across the US that listened to legal arguments on Wednesday.  His second attempt did not affect current visa holders but it continued to block travel to the US for citizens of Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Iran, Libya and Yemen for 90 days. The first travel ban included Iraq.
Up to half-a-dozen states are seeking to block the executive order and judges in Maryland and the state of Washington also heard cases. As with the first order, refugees were still blocked from entering the US for 120 days but an indefinite ban on all refugees from Syria was dropped in the new one.
The Trump administration has also said the ban is not religiously motivated because the six countries only represent a small fraction – around nine per cent – of the world’s Muslim population.The Trump administration has also said the ban is not religiously motivated because the six countries only represent a small fraction – around nine per cent – of the world’s Muslim population.
But Rudy Giuliani, the former Mayor of New York and an advisor to Mr Trump, explained the beginnings of the order on television and said the President had used the term “Muslim ban”. But campaigners said the new ban still discriminated, on both grounds of nationality and religion.
Judge Watson, who was appointed by former President Barack Obama, was one of three federal judges across the US that listened to legal arguments. 
Up to half-a-dozen states are seeking to block the executive order and judges in Maryland and the state of Washington also heard cases.
Rudy Giuliani, the former Mayor of New York and an adviser to Mr Trump, explained the beginnings of the order and said the President had used the term “Muslim ban”.
“When [Mr Trump] first announced it, he said, ‘Muslim ban.’ He called me up. He said, ‘Put a commission together. Show me the right way to do it legally’,” Mr Giuliani told Fox News.“When [Mr Trump] first announced it, he said, ‘Muslim ban.’ He called me up. He said, ‘Put a commission together. Show me the right way to do it legally’,” Mr Giuliani told Fox News.
Mr Trump's first travel order was more sweeping than the second revised order. Like the current one, it barred citizens of Iran, Libya, Syria, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen from entering the country for 90 days, but it also included Iraq, which was subsequently taken off the list.
Refugees were blocked from entering the country for 120 days in both orders, but an indefinite ban on all refugees from Syria was dropped in the new one.
Mass protests followed the sudden implementation of the first order which caused widespread chaos at airports.Mass protests followed the sudden implementation of the first order which caused widespread chaos at airports.
Mr Trump issued a statement at the time in which he claimed: “To be clear, this is not a Muslim ban, as the media is falsely reporting. This is not about religion – this is about terror and keeping our country safe. Mr Trump issued a statement at the time in which he claimed: “To be clear, this is not a Muslim ban, as the media is falsely reporting. This is not about religion – this is about terror and keeping our country safe. 
“There are over 40 different countries worldwide that are majority Muslim that are not affected by this order.”“There are over 40 different countries worldwide that are majority Muslim that are not affected by this order.”
At a rally in Nashville Mr Trump called the move by the judge an “unprecedented judicial overreach” and said he was ready to take the case “as far as it needs to go” including to the Supreme Court.At a rally in Nashville Mr Trump called the move by the judge an “unprecedented judicial overreach” and said he was ready to take the case “as far as it needs to go” including to the Supreme Court.
“The order he blocked was a watered-down version of the first order that was also blocked by another judge and that should never have been blocked to start with,” said the President. “This is, in the opinion of many, an unprecedented judicial overreach.”“The order he blocked was a watered-down version of the first order that was also blocked by another judge and that should never have been blocked to start with,” said the President. “This is, in the opinion of many, an unprecedented judicial overreach.”