This article is from the source 'washpo' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/mr-chaffetzs-abrupt--and-welcome--exit/2017/04/23/0b38537c-26c9-11e7-bb9d-8cd6118e1409_story.html

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Mr. Chaffetz’s abrupt — and welcome — exit Chaffetz’s abrupt — and welcome — exit
(about 1 hour later)
NO SOONER had Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) announced that he wouldn’t seek reelection in 2018 than he also allowed he likely wouldn’t serve out his current term. Chances are, no one is more anxious for him to leave Washington than residents of the capital, whose interests he has persistently tried to undermine. During his time in Congress, no member of either chamber has fought harder against home rule. We can only hope that whoever succeeds him as chairman of the committee with oversight over the District has more respect than he for the city’s democratic rights.NO SOONER had Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) announced that he wouldn’t seek reelection in 2018 than he also allowed he likely wouldn’t serve out his current term. Chances are, no one is more anxious for him to leave Washington than residents of the capital, whose interests he has persistently tried to undermine. During his time in Congress, no member of either chamber has fought harder against home rule. We can only hope that whoever succeeds him as chairman of the committee with oversight over the District has more respect than he for the city’s democratic rights.
Mr. Chaffetz’s sudden decision, disclosed Wednesday on his Facebook page, shocked the political world. He had, after all, just won reelection and was seen as a likely candidate for the Senate. The always-suspect explanation of wanting to spend more time with family seemed especially curious, given that he and his wife were about to become empty nesters. That he is choosing to walk away makes perfect sense, though, when viewed through the crass political considerations that have marked his career.Mr. Chaffetz’s sudden decision, disclosed Wednesday on his Facebook page, shocked the political world. He had, after all, just won reelection and was seen as a likely candidate for the Senate. The always-suspect explanation of wanting to spend more time with family seemed especially curious, given that he and his wife were about to become empty nesters. That he is choosing to walk away makes perfect sense, though, when viewed through the crass political considerations that have marked his career.
Mr. Chaffetz rose to national prominence via his high-profile investigations as chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. But the zeal for ferreting out supposed wrongdoing, which was on full display during the Obama administration and when Hillary Clinton was running for office, was nowhere to be seen when Donald Trump took office and questions immediately arose about conflicts of interest, violations of the emoluments clause or Russian connections. Now in the crosshairs of rising public discontent — becoming what the Deseret News called “the face of Republican fecklessness” — Mr. Chaffetz apparently saw retreat to Utah, and possible preparation for a run for governor, as the best way out.Mr. Chaffetz rose to national prominence via his high-profile investigations as chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. But the zeal for ferreting out supposed wrongdoing, which was on full display during the Obama administration and when Hillary Clinton was running for office, was nowhere to be seen when Donald Trump took office and questions immediately arose about conflicts of interest, violations of the emoluments clause or Russian connections. Now in the crosshairs of rising public discontent — becoming what the Deseret News called “the face of Republican fecklessness” — Mr. Chaffetz apparently saw retreat to Utah, and possible preparation for a run for governor, as the best way out.
Such expediency doesn’t come as a big surprise to D.C. officials and residents, since Mr. Chaffetz routinely tried to advance his political interests at their expense. How else to describe the hypocrisy of him holding himself out as an advocate for local control and less government while at the same trying to prevent the city from spending its local dollars and deciding local laws? In his first month in Congress in 2009, he testified against voting rights for the District, and in the following years he opposed budget autonomy, sought to overturn laws passed by the D.C. Council and once even threatened Mayor Muriel E. Bowser (D) with jail because of the city’s legalization of marijuana.Such expediency doesn’t come as a big surprise to D.C. officials and residents, since Mr. Chaffetz routinely tried to advance his political interests at their expense. How else to describe the hypocrisy of him holding himself out as an advocate for local control and less government while at the same trying to prevent the city from spending its local dollars and deciding local laws? In his first month in Congress in 2009, he testified against voting rights for the District, and in the following years he opposed budget autonomy, sought to overturn laws passed by the D.C. Council and once even threatened Mayor Muriel E. Bowser (D) with jail because of the city’s legalization of marijuana.
The District is right to celebrate Mr. Chaffetz’s departure, but it should be wary. Those likely in line to take over as head of the oversight committee seem similarly antagonistic to the District. There is hope, though, in the fact that there have been Republicans in charge of the committee — Rep. Darrell Issa (Calif.) and former Rep. Tom Davis (Va.) — who turned out to be advocates for equal and fair treatment of the District and its residents.The District is right to celebrate Mr. Chaffetz’s departure, but it should be wary. Those likely in line to take over as head of the oversight committee seem similarly antagonistic to the District. There is hope, though, in the fact that there have been Republicans in charge of the committee — Rep. Darrell Issa (Calif.) and former Rep. Tom Davis (Va.) — who turned out to be advocates for equal and fair treatment of the District and its residents.
Read more here:Read more here:
Letters to the Editor: Mr. Chaffetz’s ‘slap in the face’ to D.C. residentsLetters to the Editor: Mr. Chaffetz’s ‘slap in the face’ to D.C. residents
Jason Chaffetz and Jim DeMint: D.C. is disregarding the sanctity of life. Congress must act.Jason Chaffetz and Jim DeMint: D.C. is disregarding the sanctity of life. Congress must act.
The Post’s View: The GOP loves self-government — except in the DistrictThe Post’s View: The GOP loves self-government — except in the District
The Post’s View: A congressman overreaches on D.C.’s death-with-dignity lawThe Post’s View: A congressman overreaches on D.C.’s death-with-dignity law