This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/04/world/middleeast/russia-iran-turkey-syria-de-escalation-zones.html

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Russia, Iran and Turkey Agree to Create 4 Safe Zones in Syria Russia Reaches Deal for Syria Safe Zones, but Some Rebels Scoff
(about 3 hours later)
Russia, Iran and Turkey signed a memorandum on Thursday to create four safe “de-escalation zones” in Syria, which if successful would be one of the most far-reaching steps to halt bloodshed in a war now in its seventh year.Russia, Iran and Turkey signed a memorandum on Thursday to create four safe “de-escalation zones” in Syria, which if successful would be one of the most far-reaching steps to halt bloodshed in a war now in its seventh year.
The memorandum, circulated in advance by Russia at cease-fire talks in Astana, Kazakhstan, is rife with ambiguities. Some rebel representatives at the talks denounced the agreement as inadequate.The memorandum, circulated in advance by Russia at cease-fire talks in Astana, Kazakhstan, is rife with ambiguities. Some rebel representatives at the talks denounced the agreement as inadequate.
But the top United Nations envoy dealing with the conflict, Staffan de Mistura, who also was at the talks, called the memorandum an “important, promising, positive step in the right direction.” It was a significant endorsement from a diplomat who has struggled mightily to bring antagonists together for peace talks that have made no progress.But the top United Nations envoy dealing with the conflict, Staffan de Mistura, who also was at the talks, called the memorandum an “important, promising, positive step in the right direction.” It was a significant endorsement from a diplomat who has struggled mightily to bring antagonists together for peace talks that have made no progress.
Russia and Iran are the main allies of President Bashar al-Assad of Syria, and Turkey is a major backer of some of the important armed insurgent groups that oppose him.Russia and Iran are the main allies of President Bashar al-Assad of Syria, and Turkey is a major backer of some of the important armed insurgent groups that oppose him.
Under the memorandum they signed as guarantors of a cease-fire, fighting between government forces and insurgents is to stop in four zones that include rebel-held territory in the north, central and southern parts of the country.Under the memorandum they signed as guarantors of a cease-fire, fighting between government forces and insurgents is to stop in four zones that include rebel-held territory in the north, central and southern parts of the country.
It remains unclear precisely how the guarantors will monitor compliance with what they are calling “de-escalation zones.”It remains unclear precisely how the guarantors will monitor compliance with what they are calling “de-escalation zones.”
Aleksandr Lavrentyev, the Russian negotiator at the Astana talks, was quoted by Russian news media as saying Russia was prepared to send observers to these zones and “work more closely” with other countries that back the rebels, including the United States and Saudi Arabia.Aleksandr Lavrentyev, the Russian negotiator at the Astana talks, was quoted by Russian news media as saying Russia was prepared to send observers to these zones and “work more closely” with other countries that back the rebels, including the United States and Saudi Arabia.
There was no immediate comment from the United States, which sent an emissary to the Astana talks after a telephone conversation on Tuesday between President Trump and President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia, who vowed to renew efforts to collaborate on ending the Syria conflict.There was no immediate comment from the United States, which sent an emissary to the Astana talks after a telephone conversation on Tuesday between President Trump and President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia, who vowed to renew efforts to collaborate on ending the Syria conflict.
The zones exclude any areas held by the Islamic State and a Qaeda affiliate commonly known as the Nusra Front, extremist groups that are not participating in the talks and that have been targeted in aerial assaults by forces of Russia and the United States.The zones exclude any areas held by the Islamic State and a Qaeda affiliate commonly known as the Nusra Front, extremist groups that are not participating in the talks and that have been targeted in aerial assaults by forces of Russia and the United States.
Osama Abu Zeid, a spokesman for some of the rebel groups at the Astana talks, said in a statement that they had rejected the memorandum partly because creation of the zones implied a fragmentation of the country and the pact contained no guarantee of “the unity of the Syrian territory.”Osama Abu Zeid, a spokesman for some of the rebel groups at the Astana talks, said in a statement that they had rejected the memorandum partly because creation of the zones implied a fragmentation of the country and the pact contained no guarantee of “the unity of the Syrian territory.”
Mr. Zeid also said the groups he represented opposed any role as a cease-fire guarantor for Iran and the pro-Assad militias it supports because “they are aggressors.”Mr. Zeid also said the groups he represented opposed any role as a cease-fire guarantor for Iran and the pro-Assad militias it supports because “they are aggressors.”
Mr. Lavrentyev said at a news conference in Astana that the agreement would go into effect on Saturday and that the Syrian Air Force was expected to avoid the protected zones.Mr. Lavrentyev said at a news conference in Astana that the agreement would go into effect on Saturday and that the Syrian Air Force was expected to avoid the protected zones.
He also said the Syrian government would abide by the agreement, unless rebel groups carried out attacks in the zones — ambiguous language that critics called a loophole that allows violations committed by Mr. Assad’s side.He also said the Syrian government would abide by the agreement, unless rebel groups carried out attacks in the zones — ambiguous language that critics called a loophole that allows violations committed by Mr. Assad’s side.
Many of Mr. Assad’s opponents in the conflict say the Syrian government has no credibility to honor any cease-fire agreement because it has violated all previous such pacts since the conflict began in March 2011.Many of Mr. Assad’s opponents in the conflict say the Syrian government has no credibility to honor any cease-fire agreement because it has violated all previous such pacts since the conflict began in March 2011.