This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/may/10/james-comey-fired-fbi-senate-response-russia-investigation

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Senate struggles to respond to Trump's shock firing of James Comey Few Republicans defend Comey firing outright, as Democrats cry Watergate
(about 2 hours later)
Democrats on Capitol Hill searched for new ways to condemn a president who flouts constitutional norms on a near-daily basis and Republicans attempted to adequately express their concern without criticizing Donald Trump, as Congress struggled to respond to the surprise firing of FBI director James Comey on Wednesday. Republicans on Capitol Hill gave a muted response to Donald Trump’s surprise firing of FBI director James Comey, while Democrats compared the situation to the Watergate scandal.
For Democrats, there were parallels to Watergate. Bob Casey, a moderate from Pennsylvania facing re-election in 2018, called Trump’s actions “Nixonian” on Tuesday night, while Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut explicitly compared Trump’s actions to the 37th president. GOP Senate intelligence chairman Richard Burr called the timing of and reasons given for Comey’s dismissal “troubling” and said it “further confuses an already difficult investigation” into Russian interference with the 2016 election. John Kasich, the governor of Ohio and a primary opponent of Trump’s, went further, saying he was “extremely troubled by the circumstances surrounding the dismissal”, while John McCain, another outspoken foe of the president, said he was “disappointed”.
But while one Senate Republican, Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia, indicated some interest in a special prosecutor being appointed to investigate the Russian role in the election – “I’m not saying yes, I’m not saying no” she told reporters – others still remained firmly against.
Senator Susan Collins of Maine told reporters: “I am concerned that the Senate investigation by the intelligence committee is now at a critical state. We’ve made a lot of progress in the past month and I would be concerned if an independent counsel could shut that down.”
Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana expressed his concern that “the White House’s timing of the firing was less than impeccable”. The newly elected Republican added his view “that the president’s selection of new FBI director might be one of the most important decisions of his presidency”.
This concern over appearances was echoed by Bob Corker, the GOP chair of the foreign relations committee, who insisted: “We have to figure out a way forward that is beyond reproach and find an FBI director that is beyond reproach.”
In the meantime, there was confidence among Republicans that the process wouldn’t affect current congressional and FBI investigations. Bill Cassidy of Louisiana argued that Comey was “not running that investigation”, saying the FBI director’s “first meeting in the morning is about HR, his second is about the budget, his third is about the cafeteria, his fourth is about M[S]-13 gangs, his fifth is with the director of this particular investigation and that person whoever he or she is is still there and still running it”.
Few Republicans explicitly defended Trump’s actions. Senator John Cornyn of Texas told reporters: “We’re going to get the bottom of this. We’re going to get the facts, I agree that Director Comey is a good man; he made a bad mistake.”
When asked what the mistake was Cornyn said “read the Rod Rosenstein memo”, implying he shared the deputy attorney general’s and the White House’s belief that Comey should have been fired for his handling of the FBI’s investigation into Hillary Clinton’s email server.
Others like Johnny Isakson of Georgia remained equivocal. He noted that Comey was “the president’s person to hire and the president’s person to fire”. Isakson added since Trump is “the only guy who can [fire the FBI director], that’s his job. That’s what the public has to judge. That’s what we have to judge.”
When asked if he had an emotional reaction to Trump’s sacking of Comey, Isakson said: “This is not an emotional business.”
Meanwhile Democrats drew parallels to Watergate, the scandal that brought down Richard Nixon in 1974.
Bob Casey, a moderate from Pennsylvania facing re-election in 2018, called Trump’s actions “Nixonian” on Tuesday night, while Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut explicitly compared Trump’s actions to the 37th president.
“The situation has very much the look and feel of Nixon’s dismissal of attorneys general in the Saturday Night Massacre,” he said, referring to the resignations of attorney general Elliot L Richardson and deputy attorney general William D Ruckelshaus in 1973 after they refused Richard Nixon’s order to fire Archibald Cox, the special prosecutor leading the Watergate investigation.“The situation has very much the look and feel of Nixon’s dismissal of attorneys general in the Saturday Night Massacre,” he said, referring to the resignations of attorney general Elliot L Richardson and deputy attorney general William D Ruckelshaus in 1973 after they refused Richard Nixon’s order to fire Archibald Cox, the special prosecutor leading the Watergate investigation.
Blumenthal said his Republican colleagues were “thinking seriously about the constitutional crisis we face right now and they are deeply troubled by the potential confrontation not unlike United States v Nixon”, the landmark supreme court case that forced Nixon to hand over Oval Office recordings to federal investigators.Blumenthal said his Republican colleagues were “thinking seriously about the constitutional crisis we face right now and they are deeply troubled by the potential confrontation not unlike United States v Nixon”, the landmark supreme court case that forced Nixon to hand over Oval Office recordings to federal investigators.
Sherrod Brown of Ohio echoed these comparisons by claiming that Comey was fired because the FBI’s investigation was on the verge of implicating Trump. “It’s only about his investigation, and [Trump] knows they are getting close and he’s going to resist it,” the Ohio Democrat said.Sherrod Brown of Ohio echoed these comparisons by claiming that Comey was fired because the FBI’s investigation was on the verge of implicating Trump. “It’s only about his investigation, and [Trump] knows they are getting close and he’s going to resist it,” the Ohio Democrat said.
One key change in strategy appeared to be a demand that deputy attorney general Rod Rosenstein join attorney general Jeff Sessions in recusing himself from the Russia investigation. One key change in strategy appeared to be a demand that deputy attorney general Rosenstein join attorney general Jeff Sessions in recusing himself from the Russia investigation.
After a closed-door meeting of Senate Democrats on Wednesday morning, several emerged to say that Rosenstein, who was confirmed several weeks ago by 94-6 vote in the Senate, should step aside.After a closed-door meeting of Senate Democrats on Wednesday morning, several emerged to say that Rosenstein, who was confirmed several weeks ago by 94-6 vote in the Senate, should step aside.
Dianne Feinstein of California told reporters: “Attorney general Sessions and deputy attorney general Rod Rosenstein should both recuse themselves from the appointment, selection and reporting of a special consul. This issue should be handled by the most senior career attorney at the Department of Justice.”Dianne Feinstein of California told reporters: “Attorney general Sessions and deputy attorney general Rod Rosenstein should both recuse themselves from the appointment, selection and reporting of a special consul. This issue should be handled by the most senior career attorney at the Department of Justice.”
This was echoed by Casey, who said of the No 2 official at the justice department: “There are a lot of questions about that now that we might not have even hours or days ago. I’ve learned some things this morning that leads me to believe … he shouldn’t even make that decision.”This was echoed by Casey, who said of the No 2 official at the justice department: “There are a lot of questions about that now that we might not have even hours or days ago. I’ve learned some things this morning that leads me to believe … he shouldn’t even make that decision.”
Democrats thought Comey’s firing gave new life to their push for a special prosecutor to investigate Russian interference in the 2016 election. Senator Ben Cardin of Maryland called the president’s decision to fire Comey a “game-changer” in that effort.Democrats thought Comey’s firing gave new life to their push for a special prosecutor to investigate Russian interference in the 2016 election. Senator Ben Cardin of Maryland called the president’s decision to fire Comey a “game-changer” in that effort.
“Before yesterday there were a few Republicans who thought that was a good idea,” Cardin said. However, the Democrat thought public outcry would force them to yield. “I expect that there’s going to be a public reaction demanding that we have that independent investigation.”“Before yesterday there were a few Republicans who thought that was a good idea,” Cardin said. However, the Democrat thought public outcry would force them to yield. “I expect that there’s going to be a public reaction demanding that we have that independent investigation.”
While one Senate Republican, Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia, indicated some interest in a special prosecutor being appointed – “I’m not saying yes, I’m not saying no” she told reporters – others still remained firmly against.
Susan Collins of Maine told reporters: “I am concerned that the Senate investigation by the intelligence committee is now at a critical state. We’ve made a lot of progress in the past month and I would be concerned if an independent counsel could shut that down.”
John Kennedy of Louisiana expressed his concern that “the White House’s timing of the firing was less than impeccable”. The newly elected Republican added his view “that the president’s selection of new FBI director might be one of the most important decisions of his presidency”.
This concern over appearances was echoed by Bob Corker, the GOP chair of the foreign relations committee, who insisted: “We have to figure out a way forward that is beyond reproach and find an FBI director that is beyond approach.”
In the meantime, there was confidence among Republicans in the process and that it wouldn’t affect current congressional and FBI investigations. Bill Cassidy of Louisiana argued that Comey was “not running that investigation,” saying the FBI director’s “first meeting in the morning is about HR, his second is about the budget, his third is about the cafeteria, his fourth is about M[S]-13 gangs, his fifth is with the director of this particular investigation and that person whoever he or she is is still there and still running it.”
Few Republicans explicitly defended Trump’s actions. John Cornyn of Texas told reporters: “We’re going to get the bottom of this. We’re going to get the facts, I agree that Director Comey is a good man; he made a bad mistake.”
When asked what the mistake was, Cornyn said “read the Rod Rosenstein memo” implying he shared the White House’s belief that Comey should have been fired for his handling of the FBI’s investigation into Hillary Clinton’s email server.
Others like Johnny Isakson of Georgia remained equivocal. He noted that Comey was “the president’s person to hire and the president’s person to fire.” Isakson added since Trump is “the only guy who can [fire the FBI director], that’s his job. That’s what the public has to judge. That’s what we have to judge.”
When asked if he had an emotional reaction to Trump’s sacking of Comey, Isakson said: “This is not an emotional business.”