This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/11/us/politics/live-briefing-james-comey-andrew-mccabe.html

The article has changed 11 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 5 Version 6
Latest Developments on Comey: Acting F.B.I. Chief Testifies Latest Developments on Comey: Acting F.B.I. Chief Testifies
(35 minutes later)
■ Andrew G. McCabe, the acting director of the F.B.I., is testifying before the Senate Intelligence Committee.■ Andrew G. McCabe, the acting director of the F.B.I., is testifying before the Senate Intelligence Committee.
The committee’s top Democrat asked Mr. McCabe to tell senators about any efforts by the White House to intervene with the Justice Department’s investigation of o Russia’s meddling in the presidential election. ■ Mr. McCabe said that President Trump’s firing of James B. Comey, the F.B.I. director, had not affected the Justice Department’s investigation of Russia’s meddling in the presidential election.
President Trump had been talking openly about firing James B. Comey, the F.B.I. director, for at least a week, according to people close to the president. The committee’s top Democrat asked Mr. McCabe to tell senators about any efforts by the White House to intervene with the investigation.
Days before he was fired, Mr. Comey asked for a significant increase in resources for the inquiry into Russia’s election interference, according to four congressional officials. ■ Mr. Trump had been talking openly about firing Mr. Comey for at least a week, according to people close to the president.
The top Democrat on the committee, Senator Mark Warner of Virginia, sought assurances from Mr. McCabe that he would sound the alarm if the White House or others tried to intervene in the investigation into whether any of President Trump’s associates colluded with Russia in its election interference. The unfolding saga over Mr. Trump’s abrupt firing of Mr. Comey hung over the hearing, infusing political theater into annual testimony by the nation’s top security officials about the biggest threats facing the United States.
“While we don’t know how long you will be acting as F.B.I. director, my first questions for you, even in this public setting, will be for you to assure the committee that if you come under any political influence from the White House or others to squash this investigation, or impede it in any way, that you will let this committee know,” Mr. Warner said. Mr. McCabe was adamant that the firing of Mr. Comey had not affected the Justice Department’s investigation into whether any Trump associates colluded with Russians in their meddling in the election.
He called the firing of Mr. Comey “a shocking development.” “The work of the men and women of the F.B.I. continues despite any chances in circumstances,” he said in response to a question from Senator Marco Rubio, Republican of Florida. “There has been no effort to impede our investigation to date. Simply put, you cannot stop the men and women of the F.B.I. from doing the right thing.”
“It’s hard to avoid the conclusion that the president’s decision to remove Director Comey was related to this investigation and that is truly unacceptable,” he added. “Our committee will get to the bottom of what happened in the 2016 presidential election.” Mr. McCabe is likely to sidestep more sensitive questions about the Russia inquiry from Democrats pressing him for information and looking to keep the investigation dominant in the news, despite the committee’s Republican chairman’s efforts to keep the subject from dominating the day.
Adam Goldman and Matthew Rosenberg “Let me disappoint you,” Senator Richard M. Burr of North Carolina said as he opened the proceeding. “The purpose of today’s hearing is to review and highlight to the extent possible the ranges of threats we face as a nation,” he said, before listing dangers the United States faces, including cyber threats, Islamist militants and North Korea.
The unfolding saga over Mr. Trump’s abrupt firing of Mr. Comey is certain to hang over a hearing underway on Capitol Hill that brought together the nation’s top national security officials, infusing political theater into their annual testimony about the biggest threats facing the United States.
Among the witnesses for the Senate Intelligence Committee proceeding was Mr. McCabe, who was named acting F.B.I. director upon Mr. Comey’s firing.
Mr. McCabe is now overseeing the F.B.I. investigation into whether any Trump associates colluded with Russians in their meddling in the election. But don’t expect him to volunteer much about that, or even be asked, at least by Republicans.
“Let me disappoint you,” said Senator Richard M. Burr, the Republican chairman of the committee, as he opened the hearing. “The purpose of today’s hearing is to review and highlight to the extent possible the ranges of threats we face as a nation,” he said, before listing dangers the United States faces, including cyber threats, Islamist militants and North Korea.
Mr. McCabe is very likely to sidestep sensitive questions about the Russia inquiry from Democrats pressing him for information and looking to keep the investigation dominant in the news.
Although he is well known in the intelligence community, Mr. McCabe, a veteran F.B.I. agent, has little name recognition outside of Washington. He has dealt with Congress for years but usually behind closed doors.Although he is well known in the intelligence community, Mr. McCabe, a veteran F.B.I. agent, has little name recognition outside of Washington. He has dealt with Congress for years but usually behind closed doors.
A Duke University graduate with a law degree from Washington University in St. Louis, Mr. McCabe is considered a skilled briefer. He is something of wunderkind at the F.B.I., rising quickly in the organization to become deputy director in early 2016. But he is not universally loved among agents.A Duke University graduate with a law degree from Washington University in St. Louis, Mr. McCabe is considered a skilled briefer. He is something of wunderkind at the F.B.I., rising quickly in the organization to become deputy director in early 2016. But he is not universally loved among agents.
Some inside the F.B.I. believe he did not work in the field long enough and rose too quickly to appreciate the concerns of working-level agents.Some inside the F.B.I. believe he did not work in the field long enough and rose too quickly to appreciate the concerns of working-level agents.
Also testifying are Mike Pompeo, the director of the Central Intelligence Agency; Dan Coats, the director of national intelligence; Adm. Michael S. Rogers, the head of the National Security Agency; and others.Also testifying are Mike Pompeo, the director of the Central Intelligence Agency; Dan Coats, the director of national intelligence; Adm. Michael S. Rogers, the head of the National Security Agency; and others.
— Adam Goldman— Adam Goldman
The top Democrat on the committee, Senator Mark Warner of Virginia, sought assurances from Mr. McCabe that he would sound the alarm if the White House or others tried to intervene in the investigation into whether any of President Trump’s associates colluded with Russia in its election interference.
“While we don’t know how long you will be acting as F.B.I. director, my first questions for you, even in this public setting, will be for you to assure the committee that if you come under any political influence from the White House or others to squash this investigation, or impede it in any way, that you will let this committee know,” said Mr. Warner, who has called the committee’s own inquiry into Russian election interference “probably the most important thing I’ve done in public life.”
He called the firing of Mr. Comey “a shocking development.”
“It’s hard to avoid the conclusion that the president’s decision to remove Director Comey was related to this investigation and that is truly unacceptable,” he added. “Our committee will get to the bottom of what happened in the 2016 presidential election.”
Mr. Burr asked whether Mr. McCabe was aware of Mr. Comey telling the president three times that he was not under investigation, as Mr. Trump claimed. Mr. McCabe said he could not comment on any conversations that Mr. Comey might have had with the president.
— Adam Goldman and Matthew Rosenberg
Democratic lawmakers were increasingly critical Thursday of Attorney General Jeff Sessions and his deputy, Rod J. Rosenstein, who wrote the 13-paragraph memo that Mr. Trump has said was the basis for Mr. Comey’s ouster.Democratic lawmakers were increasingly critical Thursday of Attorney General Jeff Sessions and his deputy, Rod J. Rosenstein, who wrote the 13-paragraph memo that Mr. Trump has said was the basis for Mr. Comey’s ouster.
Senator Dianne Feinstein, Democrat of California, said she had read Mr. Rosenstein’s memo three times.Senator Dianne Feinstein, Democrat of California, said she had read Mr. Rosenstein’s memo three times.
“With each read, I’ve become more troubled by the contents of this unusual document,” Ms. Feinstein said, expressing surprise that Mr. Rosenstein, a Justice Department veteran, had not offered a more thorough rationale, but instead referenced the public comments of some of his predecessors as deputy attorney general.“With each read, I’ve become more troubled by the contents of this unusual document,” Ms. Feinstein said, expressing surprise that Mr. Rosenstein, a Justice Department veteran, had not offered a more thorough rationale, but instead referenced the public comments of some of his predecessors as deputy attorney general.
“Instead of a document that provides meaningful analysis, the memo reads like political document. It includes quotes from op-eds and television appearances that are as old as six months. It doesn’t include any contemporary insights from inside the F.B.I. The memo appears to have been hastily assembled to justify a preordained outcome.”“Instead of a document that provides meaningful analysis, the memo reads like political document. It includes quotes from op-eds and television appearances that are as old as six months. It doesn’t include any contemporary insights from inside the F.B.I. The memo appears to have been hastily assembled to justify a preordained outcome.”
Ms. Feinstein, who has called for a special prosecutor in the Russia inquiry, demanded that both Mr. Sessions and Mr. Rosenstein recuse themselves from selecting someone for such a role.Ms. Feinstein, who has called for a special prosecutor in the Russia inquiry, demanded that both Mr. Sessions and Mr. Rosenstein recuse themselves from selecting someone for such a role.
“This issue should be handled by the most senior career attorney at the Justice Department,” she said.“This issue should be handled by the most senior career attorney at the Justice Department,” she said.
— Rebecca R. Ruiz— Rebecca R. Ruiz
For many years in a row, the “Worldwide Threat Assessment” produced by the nation’s 16 intelligence agencies has been clear about the No. 1 threat: cyberattacks on the United States. The question is whether it stays there.For many years in a row, the “Worldwide Threat Assessment” produced by the nation’s 16 intelligence agencies has been clear about the No. 1 threat: cyberattacks on the United States. The question is whether it stays there.
President Trump was clear about his top threat during the campaign: what he called “radical Islamic terrorism.” He spoke often about immigration. He occasionally took up the topic of “the cyber,” as he termed it during the campaign, but his administration is still rewriting an executive order that was supposed to be issued in the first days of his presidency. A deadline for a 90-day review of American cyber defense went by a few weeks ago with nary a word.President Trump was clear about his top threat during the campaign: what he called “radical Islamic terrorism.” He spoke often about immigration. He occasionally took up the topic of “the cyber,” as he termed it during the campaign, but his administration is still rewriting an executive order that was supposed to be issued in the first days of his presidency. A deadline for a 90-day review of American cyber defense went by a few weeks ago with nary a word.
Threat assessment is an art, not a science, and a decade ago, cybersecurity barely appeared in the annual report at all. But after a year in which the American election process became a victim of a combination of cyber- and information-warfare techniques, which caught the government unaware, it would seem to be a strange time to demote the ranking of the threat.Threat assessment is an art, not a science, and a decade ago, cybersecurity barely appeared in the annual report at all. But after a year in which the American election process became a victim of a combination of cyber- and information-warfare techniques, which caught the government unaware, it would seem to be a strange time to demote the ranking of the threat.
— David E. Sanger— David E. Sanger
Mr. Comey’s firing has led several lawmakers to call for an independent investigator or commission on top of the current investigations into potential links between Russia and the Trump campaign.Mr. Comey’s firing has led several lawmakers to call for an independent investigator or commission on top of the current investigations into potential links between Russia and the Trump campaign.
In addition to the F.B.I.’s investigation, two congressional committees are pursuing inquiries into the matter.In addition to the F.B.I.’s investigation, two congressional committees are pursuing inquiries into the matter.
See where things stand with the inquiries »See where things stand with the inquiries »
After the president fired Mr. Comey, politicians on both sides of the aisle changed their attitudes toward the ousted F.B.I. director, whose farewell to his former colleagues had to be forwarded to agents on his behalf since he could no longer access the bureau’s email system.After the president fired Mr. Comey, politicians on both sides of the aisle changed their attitudes toward the ousted F.B.I. director, whose farewell to his former colleagues had to be forwarded to agents on his behalf since he could no longer access the bureau’s email system.
Congressional reaction ranged from support for the decision to calls for a special prosecutor or an independent investigation to examine the ties between Mr. Trump’s associates and the Russian government — beyond the existing inquiries by Senate and House committees. View our collection of the lawmakers’ responses »Congressional reaction ranged from support for the decision to calls for a special prosecutor or an independent investigation to examine the ties between Mr. Trump’s associates and the Russian government — beyond the existing inquiries by Senate and House committees. View our collection of the lawmakers’ responses »