This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-39933966

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Can President Donald Trump share top secret information? Can President Donald Trump share top secret information?
(about 5 hours later)
Donald Trump has once again found himself at the centre of a storm - this time for reportedly sharing "codeword classified" information with the Russian ambassador.Donald Trump has once again found himself at the centre of a storm - this time for reportedly sharing "codeword classified" information with the Russian ambassador.
The information, which related to the use of laptops on aircraft, is understood to have been passed to the Americans by an ally who had apparently chosen not to share it with Moscow.The information, which related to the use of laptops on aircraft, is understood to have been passed to the Americans by an ally who had apparently chosen not to share it with Moscow.
It was marked "codeword classified", and was highly sensitive. Mr Trump said he "had the absolute right" to tell the Russians "acts pertaining to terrorism and airline safety".
Mr Trump has now said he "had the absolute right" to tell the Russians "acts pertaining to terrorism and airline safety". Is Trump allowed to do this?
So what are the rules around confidential information, and does he really have the right? US presidents enjoy wide latitude in declassifying information under their powers, which means Mr Trump's alleged disclosure was not illegal.
What is classification? As Steven Aftergood, a government secrecy specialist with the Federation of American Scientists, told the New York Times: "It is an expression of presidential authority, and that means that the president and his designees decide what is classified, and they have the essentially unlimited authority to declassify at will.
According to an executive order signed by Barack Obama in 2009, something is considered classified if "the national defence has required that certain information be maintained in confidence in order to protect our citizens, our democratic institutions, our homeland security, and our interactions with foreign nations".
Once it is classified, the sharing of that material could lead to prosecution. However, there is no law against it.
What do the different levels of classification mean?
There are three different levels of classification
However, there is also a way to add a second level of clearance to top secret. It is administered by the CIA, and allows only those with the codeword access to the information. The material discussed by Mr Trump with the Russians was under a codeword, sources told the Washington Post.
These classifications are given by either the US president, vice-president, but more usually the heads of the various intelligence agencies.
How do things get 'declassified'?
When the classification is set, a timescale for declassification is set. In some cases, it may be an event which will signal that the information can now be made public, in others an actual date. If neither of these things are obvious, it will be automatically set for 10 years' time. However, it could also be kept classified for 25 years.
Importantly, no information should be classified indefinitely.
Is there a presidential loophole?
In short, yes.
Declassification before the agreed time - or even just downgrading its classification level - is a decision for the person who originally gave the information that level of security, their successor or supervisor. The Director of National Intelligence can downgrade or declassify an item, after consultation with the relevant heads of department.
However, the rules for classification are considered part of the president's constitutional powers - so if he wants to declassify something, he can, according to the New York Times.
Steven Aftergood, a government secrecy specialist with the Federation of American Scientists, explained to the newspaper: "It is an expression of presidential authority, and that means that the president and his designees decide what is classified, and they have the essentially unlimited authority to declassify at will.
"The president defines the terms of the security clearance system and the parameters that determine who may be given access to classified information.""The president defines the terms of the security clearance system and the parameters that determine who may be given access to classified information."
What would happen if anyone else shared confidential information? However, Mr Trump could have damaged an intelligence-sharing partnership if he revealed information without permission from the ally who provided it.
In theory, they would lose their security clearance, or even end up in prison, prosecuted under the espionage laws. Edward Snowden leaked top secret information, and ended up seeking asylum in Russia in order to avoid prosecution. He would have broken a "golden rule", the BBC's security correspondent Frank Gardner has said.
But it seems there is no hard and fast rule: American news site The Hill pointed out last year that the punishments seemed to vary based on who you were, not the information you leaked.
What does this mean for intelligence sharing in the future?
If Mr Trump has shared highly sensitive information, he has broken a "golden rule", the BBC's security correspondent Frank Gardner has said.
"There is a golden rule in the world of espionage that when one government supplies intelligence to another it must not be passed on to a third party without permission of the original supplier," he said."There is a golden rule in the world of espionage that when one government supplies intelligence to another it must not be passed on to a third party without permission of the original supplier," he said.
"The reason is simple: it could put the lives of their human informants at risk.""The reason is simple: it could put the lives of their human informants at risk."
But will this make US allies think twice about sharing information with their American counterparts? Has he committed treason?
Potentially not. Some in the international community have already sought to play down the implications of what Mr Trump may or may not have done. No. Since the president has broad authority to declassify information at his own convenience, it is unlikely he could be prosecuted for a criminal offence or treason.
New Zealand's foreign affairs minister Gerry Brownlee said Russia and the US needed to work closely together, and cited the Trump administration's denial of the story. Eliot Cohen, a former senior State Department official under former President George W Bush, tweeted: "If accidental, it would be a firing offence for anyone else. If deliberate, it would be treason".
But it is thought that Mr Trump would have to be helping a country that the US is at war with in order for it to be considered treason, according to the US constitution.
Though US relations with Russia remain strained, the two countries are not at war.
Article 3, Section 3 of the Constitution states: "Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort."
Mr Trump would have to be actively "levying war" or providing "aid and comfort" in order to consider treason charges, UC Davis law professor Carlton Larson told Vox.
But Mr Trump could face impeachment if Congress determined his actions to be reckless, Mr Aftergood told USA Today.
"His conduct is not a question for the Justice Department; it's a question for Congress," he told the newspaper.
What would happen if anyone else shared confidential information?
Other government employees could have faced losing their security clearance, or even be charged under espionage laws.
Edward Snowden leaked top secret information, and ended up seeking asylum in Russia in order to avoid prosecution.
But it seems there is no hard and fast rule: political news website The Hill pointed out last year that the punishments seemed to vary based on who you were, not the information you leaked.
Have any other presidents done anything like this?
Though presidents have been cautious about sharing information obtained through intelligence-sharing partners, it's not unheard of for the White House to reveal classified details to foreign governments, according to David Priess, a former CIA intelligence briefer and author of the President's Book of Secrets.
President John F Kennedy released spy-plane photos that purported to show Soviet missiles in Cuba in 1962 before the Cuban missile crisis, Mr Priess pointed out to Slate.
The move may have revealed valuable information about US reconnaissance missions to the Soviets, but it also enabled the US to shore up international support.
President George W Bush had several foreign leaders join him for daily classified briefings, including British Prime Minister Tony Blair, Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi and Russian President Vladimir Putin.
But as Mr Priess explains, these were not impromptu encounters and the CIA prepared special briefing material to ensure nothing was shared that would jeopardise US intelligence.
In Mr Trump's case, however, the CIA did not appear to be alerted in advance of his plan to reveal information, according to the Washington Post report.