This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/wales/south_east/6185998.stm
The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 3 | Version 4 |
|---|---|
| Go-ahead for huge opencast mine | Go-ahead for huge opencast mine |
| (30 minutes later) | |
| One of Europe's largest opencast mining projects can go ahead in south Wales, the Court of Appeal has decided. | One of Europe's largest opencast mining projects can go ahead in south Wales, the Court of Appeal has decided. |
| The Welsh assembly first approved the Ffos-y-Fran scheme at Merthyr Tydfil in February last year. | The Welsh assembly first approved the Ffos-y-Fran scheme at Merthyr Tydfil in February last year. |
| But the High Court quashed the decision after it was claimed Environment Minister Carwyn Jones had made his mind up before the planning committee met. | But the High Court quashed the decision after it was claimed Environment Minister Carwyn Jones had made his mind up before the planning committee met. |
| Mr Jones denied the claim and the Welsh assembly took the case to appeal judges, who have now given approval. | Mr Jones denied the claim and the Welsh assembly took the case to appeal judges, who have now given approval. |
| Residents had campaigned against the scheme, which will lead to the extraction of 10m tonnes of coal over 15 years. | |
| The High Court challenge centred on a claim that Mr Jones - who chaired the meeting which granted approval - had told an objector the day before that he was "going to go with the inspector's report" backing the scheme. | The High Court challenge centred on a claim that Mr Jones - who chaired the meeting which granted approval - had told an objector the day before that he was "going to go with the inspector's report" backing the scheme. |
| Wrong conclusion | Wrong conclusion |
| High Court judge Mr Justice Lindsay said it was possible Mr Jones had been "biased" in favour of the scheme. | High Court judge Mr Justice Lindsay said it was possible Mr Jones had been "biased" in favour of the scheme. |
| But the assembly government said the judge reached the wrong conclusion. | But the assembly government said the judge reached the wrong conclusion. |
| Mr Jones remained adamant he never made the reported comment and said he was "disappointed" that he did not have the opportunity to state that to the court. | Mr Jones remained adamant he never made the reported comment and said he was "disappointed" that he did not have the opportunity to state that to the court. |
| He was also cleared of any misconduct by the independent commissioner for standards. | He was also cleared of any misconduct by the independent commissioner for standards. |
| The minister said he was "pleased" at the appeal court decision and that the planning decision's committee had been found to be "robust". | The minister said he was "pleased" at the appeal court decision and that the planning decision's committee had been found to be "robust". |
| Mr Jones added extracts in the judgment set out what he had said in the conversation with one of the opencast protesters and the reasons why he had not given evidence earlier. | Mr Jones added extracts in the judgment set out what he had said in the conversation with one of the opencast protesters and the reasons why he had not given evidence earlier. |
| Important scheme | Important scheme |
| "The witness statements from which those extracts are drawn were not formally admitted in evidence but would, I believe, have set the record straight about what was said or not said during that conversation." | "The witness statements from which those extracts are drawn were not formally admitted in evidence but would, I believe, have set the record straight about what was said or not said during that conversation." |
| In the long-running dispute, campaigners claimed that they would suffer noise, dust and vibration problems from the site, with 20,000 tonnes of coal extracted each week. | In the long-running dispute, campaigners claimed that they would suffer noise, dust and vibration problems from the site, with 20,000 tonnes of coal extracted each week. |
| Developer Miller Argent (South Wales) Ltd said it welcomed the go-ahead. | Developer Miller Argent (South Wales) Ltd said it welcomed the go-ahead. |
| "Ffos-y-Fran is a hugely important reclamation scheme for south Wales, which will provide enormous economic benefits to Merthyr Tydfil, including direct employment for over 200 people (from which it is estimated that a further 400 indirect jobs will be supported). | "Ffos-y-Fran is a hugely important reclamation scheme for south Wales, which will provide enormous economic benefits to Merthyr Tydfil, including direct employment for over 200 people (from which it is estimated that a further 400 indirect jobs will be supported). |
| "It will generate tens of millions of pounds for the local economy and to the benefit of the local community." | "It will generate tens of millions of pounds for the local economy and to the benefit of the local community." |
| The developer also said it fully appreciated the concerns expressed by some residents. | The developer also said it fully appreciated the concerns expressed by some residents. |