This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/02/business/economy/jobs-report.html

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 4 Version 5
Jobs Report Leaves Fed Room to Raise Rates U.S. Unemployment at 16-Year Low, but Economy’s Weak Spots Remain
(about 11 hours later)
Employment grew in May, according to data released Friday by the government, offering the latest official snapshot of the economy. Unemployment sank to 4.3 percent in May, its lowest level in 16 years, the government reported Friday, but halfhearted wage growth and a shrinking labor force revealed the economy’s stubborn weak spots.
• 138,000 jobs were added last month. Economists had expected a gain of about 185,000. While the downsides sent bond prices lower, the report is unlikely to deter the Federal Reserve from raising interest rates when its policy makers meet in Washington this month. “It is not enough to derail the Fed at all,” said Dan North, chief economist at the credit insurer Euler Hermes North America.
• The unemployment rate fell to 4.3 percent, the lowest since 2001. The milestone on the jobless rate came with a middling increase of 138,000 in payrolls and revisions that reduced the gains in the previous two months. It mainly reflected a decline in the share of working-age adults who have a job or are in the market for one.
• The average hourly wage grew by 0.2 percent, bringing the year-over-year increase to 2.5 percent. The judgment of what constitutes strong or tepid job growth has shifted as the expansion ages. With more baby boomers retiring each year, economists estimate that the monthly addition of roughly 100,000 jobs should be enough to absorb those entering the work force, including newly minted graduates.
• A broader measure of unemployment — including people who work part time but want full-time jobs, and those who have become too discouraged to keep looking but would take a job if they could find one — dropped to 8.4 percent, the lowest since 2007.
• The increase in total nonfarm payroll employment for March was revised to 50,000, from 79,000, and the increase for April was revised to 174,000, from 211,000.
With this latest jobs report out of the way, the runway is now clear for the Federal Reserve to raise benchmark interest rates when it meets June 13 and 14.
Even before the Labor Department’s release on Friday morning, the Fed had been sending firm signals that its members viewed the economy as strong enough to withstand another rate increase.
Still, the report drove bond yields lower as traders bet that lower-than-expected jobs numbers would cause the Fed to think twice about a subsequent increase in the second half of 2017.
And the continuing low unemployment rate — more than a year without breaking the 5 percent mark — will only sharpen the debate over how close the labor market is to capacity.
Analysts were split over whether the May report was encouraging or disappointing. For those who think the economy is close to capacity, last month’s gains were solid. “With the unemployment rate dropping to 4.3 percent, it really can’t get much better,” said Brian Kropp, human resources practice leader at the consulting firm CEB, now part of Gartner.
David Berson, chief economist for Nationwide, was much more negative. “Over all, this is a disappointing jobs report, with the slowdown in payroll employment, the downward revisions to prior months’ job growth, and the slower increase in wages,” he said.
One negative sign was that the labor-force participation rate dropped, to 62.7 percent, a sign that sidelined workers were not rejoining the labor force. “That’s always ugly,” Dan North, chief economist at Euler Hermes North America, said of the decline. Although the numbers were below what Wall Street expected, it “is not enough to derail the Fed at all,” Mr. North said. The job creation at this point in the recovery is still solid.
The overall participation in the labor force has trudged along below 63 percent during the recovery, down from over 66 percent before the recession. But the tiny gains that had been made were knocked off this month, suggesting that fewer dropouts were dropping back in. Some economists pointed out that the retirement of baby boomers would continue to press down labor-force participation.
Ted Wieseman, a vice president and economist at Morgan Stanley, said there just were not that many discouraged left to return. “If the participation rate just stabilizes from here for a time, then job growth consistent with a stable unemployment rate is only about 100,000 a month,” he said.
With revisions to March and April’s job totals that show 66,000 fewer jobs created than initially reported, the three-month average swooped down to 121,000. That is far lower than previously reported, but sufficient to provide jobs to a growing population, if not to draw in dropouts.
“Even though job growth slowed, it’s still well above where it needs to be to keep up with the working-age population growth,” said Jed Kolko, chief economist at Indeed, an online recruiting site. “It’s inevitable that we would start to see a slowdown in the payroll numbers. Month-after-month job gains in the 200,000 range are not sustainable longer term. The working-age population is growing too slowly to support that.”“Even though job growth slowed, it’s still well above where it needs to be to keep up with the working-age population growth,” said Jed Kolko, chief economist at Indeed, an online recruiting site. “It’s inevitable that we would start to see a slowdown in the payroll numbers. Month-after-month job gains in the 200,000 range are not sustainable longer term. The working-age population is growing too slowly to support that.”
The Hamilton Project at the Brookings Institution in Washington calculates what it call the “jobs gap,” the number of jobs that the economy needs to create to return to pre-recession employment levels while also absorbing the people who enter the potential labor force each month. This month, the gap dropped to 340,000. Only twice in the last eight months has that 200,000 figure been reached; the average over the last three months has been 121,000. Analysts are split on whether the slower pace is a sign of the labor market’s tightness or its slack. Those who believe the economy is reaching full capacity, or is already there, argue that there are just not that many available workers left.
(Can you believe the jobs numbers? Here’s an explanation of how the Labor Department — consistently — compiles the data.) “Since 2012, this has been a tremendous period of steady, solid job growth — historic in many ways — that has slowly absorbed most if not all of the underemployed and unemployed people last year,” said Alan MacEachin, chief corporate economist at Navy Federal Credit Union.
Growing numbers of employers complain about how difficult it is to hire workers. “We have 50 to 60 openings in Pennsylvania and probably close to 100 openings across the country,” said Mark Traylor, president of the Ames Companies, whose wheelbarrow factory recently hosted President Trump. Employers continue to complain about how difficult it is to hire workers. “We have 50 to 60 openings in Pennsylvania and probably close to 100 openings across the country,” said Mark Traylor, president of the Ames Companies, whose wheelbarrow factory in Harrisburg recently played host to President Trump.
“We’ve really had to change our tactics of how we source associates,” Mr. Traylor said. His company has begun working with local high schools and community colleges to interest students in entry-level manufacturing and distribution jobs — paying about $15 an hour — which have been particularly hard to fill. “We’ve really had to change our tactics of how we source associates,” Mr. Traylor said. His company has begun working with high schools and community colleges to interest students in entry-level manufacturing and distribution jobs — paying about $15 an hour — which have been particularly hard to fill.
That willingness to train tends to be confined to the largest corporations, said Jim Guerrera, managing director at SC Novi in Michigan, an affiliate office of MRINetwork, a recruiting network. “Less and less people are willing to train,” said Mr. Guerrera, whose company specializes in the industrial and automotive sectors. Younger people tended to change jobs more frequently in the past, he said, so companies do not want to make the investment only to see their new hires leave in a couple of years. Skeptics argue that if the labor market were truly stretched, wages would be rising faster. Instead, year-over-year wage growth has declined since the end of last year to 2.5 percent, just a nose in front of inflation.
“The hiring for very specific skilled and highly skilled workers is at an all-time high right now,” he said, noting that vehicle production has reached record levels. “But people who don’t have a differentiated skill set are having a harder time finding a position.” “That’s more of a softening than a tightening story,” said Jared Bernstein, who was chief economic adviser to Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. early in the Obama administration.
The latest four-week average for initial jobless claims — which reflect firings — provided more evidence of the labor market’s tightness this week; it remained under 240,000, a historically low level. The skeptics included bond traders who drove yields down on Friday, betting that even if the Fed goes ahead with a rate increase this month, it will think twice about further moves in the second half of the year.
“Firms are reluctant to let people go because they fear that they won’t be able to rehire them later if needed, because the labor market is so tight,” Ian Shepherdson, chief economist at Pantheon Macroeconomics, said in his commentary. Also troubling is the decline in overall participation in the labor force, which has trudged along below 63 percent during the recovery, compared with more than 66 percent before the recession. Some of the tiny gains that had been made were knocked off in May, showing more people were dropping out of the labor force than returning.
The outlook for retail is not as rosy. Once the recovery took hold, the retail sector could be depended on to churn out more jobs. But it has disappointed in 2017, with heavy losses. This week, the clothing company Michael Kors announced that it would close 100 to 125 stores in the next two years. “That’s always ugly,” said Mr. North, the Euler Hermes economist.
“Retail isn’t dying, but traditional retail is dying,” said Mr. North of Euler Hermes. “There is creeping Armageddon for brick and mortar.” Moreover, he added, those who have been out of the job market for a while or lack up-to-date skills may have less bargaining power when they re-enter. Low wages and fluctuating schedules have also sown anxiety among many Americans.
Among political leaders, responses predictably split along partisan lines.
“We’re not worried about slowing job growth,” Gary D. Cohn, director of the White House’s National Economic Council, told CNBC. He pointed out that the Labor Department’s broadest measure of unemployment, which includes part-time workers who would rather have full-time jobs and those too discouraged to search, dropped to 8.4 percent, its lowest level since 2007.
By contrast, Representative Nancy Pelosi of California, the House Democratic leader, said, “May’s jobs report is a sobering wake-up call for President Trump and House Republicans, who continue to push a disastrous agenda that targets hard-working American families and endangers economic growth.”
Job recruiters continue to see a divergence in the fortunes of workers with advanced skills and those without them.
“The hiring for very specific skilled and highly skilled workers is at an all-time high right now,” said Jim Guerrera, managing director at SC Novi in Michigan, a recruiting firm specializing in the industrial and automotive sectors. “But people who don’t have a differentiated skill set are having a harder time finding a position.”
He said that while large corporations were willing to train workers, smaller firms were more wary. “Less and less people are willing to train,” Mr. Guerrera said. Younger people tended to change jobs more frequently in the past, he said, so companies do not want to make the investment only to see their new hires leave in a couple of years.
Sectors with the largest gains included health care, professional and business services, leisure and hospitality, and mining.
The government — once a pillar of steady, middle-class employment — shrank by 9,000 jobs, while the retail sector lost more than 6,000. During much of the recovery, retail could be depended on to churn out more jobs. But it has disappointed in 2017, with heavy losses. This week, the clothing company Michael Kors announced that it would close 100 to 125 stores in the next two years.
“Retail isn’t dying, but traditional retail is dying,” Mr. North said. “There is creeping Armageddon for brick and mortar.”
The transformation of the retail business wrought by online commerce has caught the attention of employers across sectors. “There’s an overriding concern with everybody I talk to,” said Frank Friedman, chief operating officer of the international accounting and consulting firm Deloitte. “How is technology going to disrupt — if at all — my business?”The transformation of the retail business wrought by online commerce has caught the attention of employers across sectors. “There’s an overriding concern with everybody I talk to,” said Frank Friedman, chief operating officer of the international accounting and consulting firm Deloitte. “How is technology going to disrupt — if at all — my business?”