This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2017/jun/08/james-comey-testimony-senate-hearing-trump-russia-fbi

The article has changed 16 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
James Comey testimony: former FBI director to go before Senate – live updates James Comey testimony: former FBI director to go before Senate – live updates
(35 minutes later)
2.49pm BST
14:49
Kamala Harris, the Democratic senator from California, sits on the committee and here shares some thoughts:
Second, I've taken the oath of office many times. The oath is to the Constitution. Trump's asking for loyalty is completely inappropriate.
2.46pm BST
14:46
a bunch of people who never watch Congressional hearings are about to find out how boring Congressional hearings can be
That’s what we’re here for – to break up the boring bits with bits of boring context. On your marks, get set, snoozzzzzzzz
2.43pm BST
14:43
While we wait, here’s some reading from ’round the web.
I helped prosecute Watergate. Comey’s statement is sufficient evidence for an obstruction of justice case.
This kind of presidential intervention in a pending criminal investigation has not been seen, to my knowledge, since the days of Richard Nixon and Watergate.
Initial Comments on James Comey’s Written Testimony
On Comey’s opening statement:
Despite this sparseness, or maybe I should say because of it, it is the most shocking single document compiled about the official conduct of the public duties of any President since the release of the Watergate tapes.
Comey’s fizzle
James Comey has an expectations problem.
By any reasonable standard, his testimony about his service under President Donald Trump and his cashiering would be damaging perhaps to the point of debilitating. But his account has been billed as Watergate and the Clinton impeachment rolled into one, another step toward Trump getting permanently helicoptered out of the White House in a Nixonian tableau, and by this unreasonable standard, Comey looks to be a fizzle.
2.39pm BST
14:39
Great connections at StubHub! Lol.
Update: CNN reports that Bharara’s a guest of senate minority leader Chuck Schumer, a fellow New Yorker.
I asked @PreetBharara if Comey requested he attend. He said, "I have great connections at StubHub." He's in 2nd row. pic.twitter.com/nTosSI0SEW
Updated
at 2.47pm BST
2.36pm BST
14:36
Guardian world affairs editor Julian Borger is in the room. As is Preet Bharara.
Special guest at Comey hearing Preet Bharara, US attorney fired by Trump. He has a reserved seat behind witness table pic.twitter.com/h3qtdMwsN6
Here’s what Bharara tweeted yesterday:
Obstruction aside, it's NEVER ok for a POTUS privately to ask an FBI Director to drop a criminal investigation. Extraordinary, wrong & dumb. https://t.co/Axwjoaw8F7
At the Senate Hart building a buzz of expectation waiting for Comey's testimony. Can't move for Watergate analogies pic.twitter.com/TmKS6jAzQD
2.34pm BST
14:34
We don’t think a high-stakes Senate testimony universally accepted as a valid occasion for morning drinking is why people hate Washington. Not a top 10 reason at least.
lined up to go to the bar to watch Comey testimony at 930. most #ThisTown thing. and people here wonder why Americans hate D.C. pic.twitter.com/mT7naUA9VA
Updated
at 2.48pm BST
2.31pm BST
14:31
2.27pm BST
14:27
Grounds for impeachment? The experts' view
Julian Borger
Legal experts agreed that James Comey’s account of his nine conversations with Donald Trump earlier this year presented strong evidence of obstruction of justice and an attempt to bury an investigation into the Trump campaign’s contacts with Moscow.
However, there were mixed opinions on whether it would be enough for a conviction, or impeachment. Articles of impeachment would have to be passed by the House of Representatives, and most Republicans on Wednesday evening appeared to close ranks in support of Trump, despite the details of Comey’s statement.
[...]
Some observers said the statement would add momentum to multiple investigations into the conduct of the Trump campaign, which could in turn produce yet more damaging testimony that would be hard for Republicans to ignore. Comey’s evidence also contradicted Trump’s account of the conversations, in which he denied demanding loyalty of Comey. If the president repeated his version under oath, he could face accusations of perjury.
“Comey’s entirely credible prepared statement strengthens my belief that the president sought to influence and even end an ongoing investigation into serious wrongdoing by [Michael] Flynn and others close to the president. That constitutes obstruction of justice,” Laurence Tribe, Harvard University professor of constitutional law, said in an email.
Read further:
2.22pm BST
14:22
The Republican National committee has released talking points to respond to today’s testimony. Click through to read, if you have the stomach for it.
First bullet point in the “Top Takeaways” section: “President Trump feels completely and totally vindicated by former FBI director James Comey’s opening testimony and is eager to move forward.”
Here are the RNC talking points to Trump allies on Comey's testimony tomorrow pic.twitter.com/8X9NKTQHMe
2.20pm BST
14:20
“Monitor” “as time permits.”
Trump will monitor Comey's testimony, as time permits, in a WH dining room with his legal team & advisers, sr. WH aide tells @PeterAlexander
2.18pm BST
14:18
Warner: 'This is not how a President of the United States behaves'
We have advance excerpts of an opening statement from Virginia senator Mark Warner, the ranking Democrat on the committee.
Warner is to call Comey’s testimony (whose opening statement again is here if you haven’t read it) “disturbing” and to underscore the extraordinarily aberrant nature of Trump’s conduct.
Here are the excerpts:
Mr. Comey, let me say at the outset that we haven’t always agreed on every issue – in fact I’ve occasionally questioned actions you’ve taken – but I’ve never had any reason to question your integrity, expertise or intelligence. You have been a straight shooter with this Committee and have been willing to speak truth to power, even at the risk of your career. Which makes the way in which you were fired by the President utterly shocking.
Recall: we began this entire process with the President and his staff first denying that the Russians were ever involved, and then falsely claiming that no one from his team was ever in touch with any Russians. We now know that this is not true.
...
The testimony that Mr. Comey has submitted for today’s hearing is disturbing. For example, on January 27th, after summoning Director Comey to dinner, the President appears to have threatened Director Comey’s job, while telling him “I need loyalty, I expect loyalty.”
At a later meeting on February 14, the President asked the Attorney General to leave the Oval Office so that he could privately ask Director Comey to “see [his] way clear to… letting Flynn go,” a statement that Director Comey interpreted as a request that we drop the investigation connected to General Flynn’s false statements. I do want to emphasize what is happening here - the President of the United States is asking the FBI Director to drop an ongoing investigation into the President’s former National Security Advisor.
In further violation of clear guidelines put in place after Watergate to prevent any whiff of political interference by the White House into FBI investigations, the President then called the FBI Director on two separate occasions – March 30 and April 11 - and asked him to “lift the cloud” of the Russia investigation.
...
At the same time the President was engaged in these efforts with Director Comey, he was also allegedly pressuring senior leaders of the intelligence community to downplay the Russia investigation or intervene with Director Comey. DNI Coats and NSA Director Admiral Rogers had plenty of opportunities to deny those reports yesterday. They did not. This is not how a President of the United States behaves. Regardless of the outcome of our investigation into those Russia links, Director Comey’s firing and his testimony raise separate and troubling questions that we must get to the bottom of.
2.11pm BST2.11pm BST
14:1114:11
Comey is scheduled to begin testifying at 10am ET. We will have a live video stream for you here in the blog when the time comes. Or you may retreat to YouTube which will stream the hearing here.Comey is scheduled to begin testifying at 10am ET. We will have a live video stream for you here in the blog when the time comes. Or you may retreat to YouTube which will stream the hearing here.
2.08pm BST2.08pm BST
14:0814:08
“Punctuality is the virtue of the bored,” Waugh said. Tell that to James Comey.“Punctuality is the virtue of the bored,” Waugh said. Tell that to James Comey.
Comey is ON THE MOVE. ETA to the Hill right now is 37 minutes, per Waze pic.twitter.com/NcvZEtGgDCComey is ON THE MOVE. ETA to the Hill right now is 37 minutes, per Waze pic.twitter.com/NcvZEtGgDC
2.05pm BST2.05pm BST
14:0514:05
We hope that Guardian world affairs editor Julian Borger found a way to skip this queue.We hope that Guardian world affairs editor Julian Borger found a way to skip this queue.
A better representation of the line for public seats. First person got here at 4:15am pic.twitter.com/BXITum4Z5YA better representation of the line for public seats. First person got here at 4:15am pic.twitter.com/BXITum4Z5Y
1.59pm BST1.59pm BST
13:5913:59
Hello and welcome to our live coverage of former FBI director James Comey’s testimony before the Senate select committee on intelligence.Hello and welcome to our live coverage of former FBI director James Comey’s testimony before the Senate select committee on intelligence.
To say Comey’s outing this morning has been eagerly anticipated would be quite to understate the matter. While the fate of Donald Trump’s presidency might not be hanging in the balance … then again it might be.To say Comey’s outing this morning has been eagerly anticipated would be quite to understate the matter. While the fate of Donald Trump’s presidency might not be hanging in the balance … then again it might be.
By now you will have read Comey’s opening statement, which was released on Wednesday afternoon.By now you will have read Comey’s opening statement, which was released on Wednesday afternoon.
To some expert eyes, the statement amounts to a clear description of an obstruction of justice on the president’s part. Others claim Comey’s testimony is a nothingburger.To some expert eyes, the statement amounts to a clear description of an obstruction of justice on the president’s part. Others claim Comey’s testimony is a nothingburger.
The opening statement describes Trump trying to establish what Comey takes to be “some sort of patronage relationship”. It describes Trump urging Comey to drop an investigation of former national security adviser Michael Flynn. It says Trump asked Comey to “lift the cloud” of the Russia investigation. And Comey describes the president making an explicit demand for personal loyalty – “I need loyalty. I expect loyalty” – the whole rule of law thing apparently notwithstanding.The opening statement describes Trump trying to establish what Comey takes to be “some sort of patronage relationship”. It describes Trump urging Comey to drop an investigation of former national security adviser Michael Flynn. It says Trump asked Comey to “lift the cloud” of the Russia investigation. And Comey describes the president making an explicit demand for personal loyalty – “I need loyalty. I expect loyalty” – the whole rule of law thing apparently notwithstanding.
“Because I have been very loyal to you, very loyal; we had that thing you know,” Comey quotes Trump as saying, as part of a request that Comey state publicly that Trump himself was not under investigation.“Because I have been very loyal to you, very loyal; we had that thing you know,” Comey quotes Trump as saying, as part of a request that Comey state publicly that Trump himself was not under investigation.
As for what Comey’s opening statement leaves out – who knows?As for what Comey’s opening statement leaves out – who knows?
Not described by Comey in his written statement:Four of the phone calls with Trump; any interactions with WH staff; interactions with AG.Not described by Comey in his written statement:Four of the phone calls with Trump; any interactions with WH staff; interactions with AG.
Comey may also testify on what may have been one of Trump’s most egregious acts, the firing of Comey itself. That happened just one month ago tomorrow.Comey may also testify on what may have been one of Trump’s most egregious acts, the firing of Comey itself. That happened just one month ago tomorrow.
The perceived hazard for the president, when Comey testifies, lies in three words: obstruction of justice. From our coverage:The perceived hazard for the president, when Comey testifies, lies in three words: obstruction of justice. From our coverage:
Comey’s testimony, legal experts say, could go a long way toward establishing whether Trump’s conversations with him amounted to the kind of confidential chatter two high officials thrown together in an unusual situation might be expected to share – or, alternatively, to something bordering on, or crossing into, illegality.Comey’s testimony, legal experts say, could go a long way toward establishing whether Trump’s conversations with him amounted to the kind of confidential chatter two high officials thrown together in an unusual situation might be expected to share – or, alternatively, to something bordering on, or crossing into, illegality.
But what can we expect from today’s hearing? “I think the most important thing that’s going to happen,” said Samuel Buell, a former federal prosecutor and law professor at Duke University, “is we’re going to get a sense of the feel and flavor of the conversations that took place, at least some of them, between the president and Comey.”But what can we expect from today’s hearing? “I think the most important thing that’s going to happen,” said Samuel Buell, a former federal prosecutor and law professor at Duke University, “is we’re going to get a sense of the feel and flavor of the conversations that took place, at least some of them, between the president and Comey.”
The flavor of these conversations is significant, Buell explained, because “obstruction of justice is an offense that largely comes down to mental state or purpose” (read further).The flavor of these conversations is significant, Buell explained, because “obstruction of justice is an offense that largely comes down to mental state or purpose” (read further).
Comey may also decline many questions, out of a desire not to influence an ongoing investigation.Comey may also decline many questions, out of a desire not to influence an ongoing investigation.
The president is preparing a rapid-response team to handle today’s testimony, which will be carried live on the big US television networks and for which bars in Washington will be opening early.The president is preparing a rapid-response team to handle today’s testimony, which will be carried live on the big US television networks and for which bars in Washington will be opening early.
Trump’s private counsel for the Russia investigations, Marc Kasowitz, was spied at the White House on Wednesday morning. The president has even threatened to live-tweet the proceedings, White House staffers have told reporters.Trump’s private counsel for the Russia investigations, Marc Kasowitz, was spied at the White House on Wednesday morning. The president has even threatened to live-tweet the proceedings, White House staffers have told reporters.
We’ll be bringing you continuous updates and commentary. Thanks for reading and please join us in the comments.We’ll be bringing you continuous updates and commentary. Thanks for reading and please join us in the comments.