This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jun/19/adam-west-batman-superheroes-serious
The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 1 | Version 2 |
|---|---|
| Adam West’s campy Batman was a joy. Modern superheroes – why so serious? | Adam West’s campy Batman was a joy. Modern superheroes – why so serious? |
| (14 days later) | |
| We all know that the character of Batman is the 21st-century version of Hamlet. It’s a given. Every great Hollywood actor must at some point attempt to put their own spin on the enigmatic crime-fighter. If Laurence Olivier were alive today he would have dressed in the cowl, given a hammy monologue about the duality of man, all while beating up Killer Croc (played by John Gielgud). | We all know that the character of Batman is the 21st-century version of Hamlet. It’s a given. Every great Hollywood actor must at some point attempt to put their own spin on the enigmatic crime-fighter. If Laurence Olivier were alive today he would have dressed in the cowl, given a hammy monologue about the duality of man, all while beating up Killer Croc (played by John Gielgud). |
| With each rendition, Batman’s humanity gains another dimension: Christian Bale demonstrates Man’s tortured soul, Michael Keaton reflects Man’s extravagant showiness, and George Clooney represents Man’s desire to get a lucrative sideline selling Nespresso. | With each rendition, Batman’s humanity gains another dimension: Christian Bale demonstrates Man’s tortured soul, Michael Keaton reflects Man’s extravagant showiness, and George Clooney represents Man’s desire to get a lucrative sideline selling Nespresso. |
| In this cavalcade of Batmaniacal acting talent, one is always dismissed out of hand. Adam West, the original screen Batman, who died last week, is remembered not as the grandfather of all Batmen, but rather as a doddery, camp uncle. With his over-the-top punches and ridiculous plotlines – a surprising number of which involve surfing competitions against the Joker, West is seen by some as the man who undermined Batman’s credibility, who defiled this great character for years before it was finally claimed from the clutches of kitsch by Tim Burton and Christopher Nolan. To those people, I say “FLRBBBBB!” (the sound of West punching someone). I put it to you that not only is West’s Batman the most fun, it is also the most subversive and truthful Batman we can hope to ever witness. | In this cavalcade of Batmaniacal acting talent, one is always dismissed out of hand. Adam West, the original screen Batman, who died last week, is remembered not as the grandfather of all Batmen, but rather as a doddery, camp uncle. With his over-the-top punches and ridiculous plotlines – a surprising number of which involve surfing competitions against the Joker, West is seen by some as the man who undermined Batman’s credibility, who defiled this great character for years before it was finally claimed from the clutches of kitsch by Tim Burton and Christopher Nolan. To those people, I say “FLRBBBBB!” (the sound of West punching someone). I put it to you that not only is West’s Batman the most fun, it is also the most subversive and truthful Batman we can hope to ever witness. |
| People looking back at the old Batman show, which ran from 1966 to 1968, say that it has aged horribly. “It’s so camp and ridiculous! Batman is supposed to be SERIOUS,” they rage, before going to Comic-Con and getting into arguments over whether Joseph Gordon Levitt was Robin or Nightwing while dressed up in a full-length DKR costume. In reality though, a comparison between the two will never work because one is an action film and the other is an out-and-out comedy. From watching old episodes of 1960s Batman, it’s clear the show is genuinely hilarious: take a scene where Batman is holding a massive novelty explosive – he looks around twice before sighing: “Some days you just can’t get rid of a bomb.” Or the time he presses pause on catching up bad guys to correct Robin’s grammar. | People looking back at the old Batman show, which ran from 1966 to 1968, say that it has aged horribly. “It’s so camp and ridiculous! Batman is supposed to be SERIOUS,” they rage, before going to Comic-Con and getting into arguments over whether Joseph Gordon Levitt was Robin or Nightwing while dressed up in a full-length DKR costume. In reality though, a comparison between the two will never work because one is an action film and the other is an out-and-out comedy. From watching old episodes of 1960s Batman, it’s clear the show is genuinely hilarious: take a scene where Batman is holding a massive novelty explosive – he looks around twice before sighing: “Some days you just can’t get rid of a bomb.” Or the time he presses pause on catching up bad guys to correct Robin’s grammar. |
| The whole thing makes the current incarnation of Batman baffling – how did we go from this likeable punning idiot to Ben Affleck killing 21 people, all while wearing a face like a slapped Batbutt? It’s the equivalent of doing a dark and edgy reboot of Fawlty Towers, where Basil is played by Michael Fassbender and his years of poor customer service have led to him becoming a brooding drug addict, whose only joy in life comes from beating up his small Spanish sidekick (played broodingly by Javier Bardem). | The whole thing makes the current incarnation of Batman baffling – how did we go from this likeable punning idiot to Ben Affleck killing 21 people, all while wearing a face like a slapped Batbutt? It’s the equivalent of doing a dark and edgy reboot of Fawlty Towers, where Basil is played by Michael Fassbender and his years of poor customer service have led to him becoming a brooding drug addict, whose only joy in life comes from beating up his small Spanish sidekick (played broodingly by Javier Bardem). |
| The problem is that Batman is an inherently dumb character. He’s a billionaire socialite who goes around dressed up as his least favourite animal, and beats up poor people in his spare time with a bunch of homemade gadgets. Put that in the real world – it would be as if Paris Hilton started dressing up like a sloth and attacking people with a toaster superglued to a blender. Now I’m not saying I don’t want to see a film about that – in fact, oh god, how can we turn that into a film? – but it just might be best to play it as a comedy. | The problem is that Batman is an inherently dumb character. He’s a billionaire socialite who goes around dressed up as his least favourite animal, and beats up poor people in his spare time with a bunch of homemade gadgets. Put that in the real world – it would be as if Paris Hilton started dressing up like a sloth and attacking people with a toaster superglued to a blender. Now I’m not saying I don’t want to see a film about that – in fact, oh god, how can we turn that into a film? – but it just might be best to play it as a comedy. |
| In fairness to a lot of superhero movies, their fundamental silliness is being played for laughs more often these days – Marvel movies in particular, with 25 releases per year, now have an obligatory number of jokes in each film. Iron Man will joke around about shawarma for a good 15 minutes before discovering the evil villain’s plot, while even Thor, the Philip Hammond of superheroes (ostensibly powerful, really dull, but has a huge six pack), looks like he gets to make a few jokes in the new trailer. But there’s still the issue of all of these films having to interconnect and “matter” – comedy director Edgar Wright was down to do Ant-Man before he quit, supposedly because the studio’s demands that he fit in with the cinematic universe didn’t allow him enough free rein. | In fairness to a lot of superhero movies, their fundamental silliness is being played for laughs more often these days – Marvel movies in particular, with 25 releases per year, now have an obligatory number of jokes in each film. Iron Man will joke around about shawarma for a good 15 minutes before discovering the evil villain’s plot, while even Thor, the Philip Hammond of superheroes (ostensibly powerful, really dull, but has a huge six pack), looks like he gets to make a few jokes in the new trailer. But there’s still the issue of all of these films having to interconnect and “matter” – comedy director Edgar Wright was down to do Ant-Man before he quit, supposedly because the studio’s demands that he fit in with the cinematic universe didn’t allow him enough free rein. |
| That’s the problem with all current superhero movies – they’re bogged down in their own mythology. There are jokes, sure, but they’re compartmentalised: shoved in the first 15 minutes, scattered around act II, then embargoed during the big action sequence except for a little coda at the end. The craziness of their situation is never acknowledged – the stakes are always high, the villains always boringly evil, the heroes always yawningly conflicted. The true comedy – the anarchy that comes with challenging the universe – is never let in. | That’s the problem with all current superhero movies – they’re bogged down in their own mythology. There are jokes, sure, but they’re compartmentalised: shoved in the first 15 minutes, scattered around act II, then embargoed during the big action sequence except for a little coda at the end. The craziness of their situation is never acknowledged – the stakes are always high, the villains always boringly evil, the heroes always yawningly conflicted. The true comedy – the anarchy that comes with challenging the universe – is never let in. |
| That’s where West’s Batman shines. The entire world in the 1960s Batman is mad – in one episode the Joker kidnaps a (culturally inappropriate) maharaja at a golf course with an exploding golfball, then puts him on a forklift truck, into a van which he then zaps with a shrink ray because … that’s useful? In another, Alfred is lured by the offer of free caviar and is trapped by the Penguin’s umbrella. Nothing makes sense and it’s glorious. | That’s where West’s Batman shines. The entire world in the 1960s Batman is mad – in one episode the Joker kidnaps a (culturally inappropriate) maharaja at a golf course with an exploding golfball, then puts him on a forklift truck, into a van which he then zaps with a shrink ray because … that’s useful? In another, Alfred is lured by the offer of free caviar and is trapped by the Penguin’s umbrella. Nothing makes sense and it’s glorious. |
| In some ways it’s reminiscent of The Goon Show – over-the-top capers performed by outrageous characters, bending the laws of logic to suit their plots. And in the same way that Peter Sellers’ Major Bloodnok and Spike Milligan’s Eccles would challenge the seriousness of British institutions such as the army and parliament, West’s Batman challenges authority. In the era of the Vietnam war and of summers of rioting all across the US, when Americans were losing faith in their system of government and their moral rectitude in the world at large, West didn’t represent a simplistic view of good v evil – he revealed the absurdity of it. His enemies’ plots are so ludicrous, the capers so dumb, his solutions so pure (at one point good dental hygiene literally saves Robin’s life), that they challenge the very concept of black-and-white morality, in the same way that marginalised groups were challenging America’s assumed brilliance towards the end of the 1960s. | In some ways it’s reminiscent of The Goon Show – over-the-top capers performed by outrageous characters, bending the laws of logic to suit their plots. And in the same way that Peter Sellers’ Major Bloodnok and Spike Milligan’s Eccles would challenge the seriousness of British institutions such as the army and parliament, West’s Batman challenges authority. In the era of the Vietnam war and of summers of rioting all across the US, when Americans were losing faith in their system of government and their moral rectitude in the world at large, West didn’t represent a simplistic view of good v evil – he revealed the absurdity of it. His enemies’ plots are so ludicrous, the capers so dumb, his solutions so pure (at one point good dental hygiene literally saves Robin’s life), that they challenge the very concept of black-and-white morality, in the same way that marginalised groups were challenging America’s assumed brilliance towards the end of the 1960s. |
| The act of taking Batman seriously, ironically, turns him into a less subversive character – once he’s embodied by Affleck, situated in the real world with real people, he can no longer challenge the lunacy of the world around us. | The act of taking Batman seriously, ironically, turns him into a less subversive character – once he’s embodied by Affleck, situated in the real world with real people, he can no longer challenge the lunacy of the world around us. |
| So thank you, Adam West, for being the most relevant Batman. At a time when the world is crazier than ever, we need more of his camp Dada-esque, universe-challenging performances, that make us question our own moral compass, not these simplistic grey and gritty reboots, even if they have a smattering of jokes here and there. Embrace silliness. Weaponise the madcaps. Say “FLRBBBB” to the status quo. | So thank you, Adam West, for being the most relevant Batman. At a time when the world is crazier than ever, we need more of his camp Dada-esque, universe-challenging performances, that make us question our own moral compass, not these simplistic grey and gritty reboots, even if they have a smattering of jokes here and there. Embrace silliness. Weaponise the madcaps. Say “FLRBBBB” to the status quo. |