This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/education/2017/jun/19/the-self-serving-myths-peddled-by-selective-and-private-schools
The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| The self-serving myths peddled by selective and private schools | The self-serving myths peddled by selective and private schools |
| (7 months later) | |
| Letters | |
| Mon 19 Jun 2017 19.15 BST | |
| Last modified on Mon 27 Nov 2017 22.06 GMT | |
| Share on Facebook | |
| Share on Twitter | |
| Share via Email | |
| View more sharing options | |
| Share on LinkedIn | |
| Share on Pinterest | |
| Share on Google+ | |
| Share on WhatsApp | |
| Share on Messenger | |
| Close | |
| In a revealing interview with Peter Wilby, Shaun Fenton asserts that the raison d’être of selective schools is “academic excellence” (The children we educate will take leadership roles and create a fairer society, 13 June). This is a self-serving myth: there is no evidence that the academic achievements of children who attend selective schools are significantly better than those of children of similar ability and social background who attend comprehensive schools. In the long term, indeed, the reverse would appear to be the case, since all the evidence shows that, among similarly qualified university students, the best degrees are obtained by those who have been to comprehensive schools. | In a revealing interview with Peter Wilby, Shaun Fenton asserts that the raison d’être of selective schools is “academic excellence” (The children we educate will take leadership roles and create a fairer society, 13 June). This is a self-serving myth: there is no evidence that the academic achievements of children who attend selective schools are significantly better than those of children of similar ability and social background who attend comprehensive schools. In the long term, indeed, the reverse would appear to be the case, since all the evidence shows that, among similarly qualified university students, the best degrees are obtained by those who have been to comprehensive schools. |
| This may be one of the many reasons why not one of the world’s best education systems employs academic selection of the kind that persists in England to the detriment of so many young lives. | This may be one of the many reasons why not one of the world’s best education systems employs academic selection of the kind that persists in England to the detriment of so many young lives. |
| The real raison d’être of selective schooling is that it reinforces existing patterns of social hierarchy, which is why it is favoured by those who are already well placed.Michael PykeCampaign for State Education | The real raison d’être of selective schooling is that it reinforces existing patterns of social hierarchy, which is why it is favoured by those who are already well placed.Michael PykeCampaign for State Education |
| • Thank you for your timely reminder about one our grosser anachronisms (Private schools cash in, 12 June). While the topic may not be central to everyone’s thinking right now, it is surely time to review the almost mythical charitable status of private schools. That they are due a tax rebate of over £500m over the next five years while the state sector struggles to make ends meet seems obscene. Perhaps once the dust has settled (if it does) the education secretary should take a good hard look at the relevant legislation and take steps to remove this irrelevant entitlement and tax burden.Dr Simon GibbsReader in educational psychology, Newcastle University | • Thank you for your timely reminder about one our grosser anachronisms (Private schools cash in, 12 June). While the topic may not be central to everyone’s thinking right now, it is surely time to review the almost mythical charitable status of private schools. That they are due a tax rebate of over £500m over the next five years while the state sector struggles to make ends meet seems obscene. Perhaps once the dust has settled (if it does) the education secretary should take a good hard look at the relevant legislation and take steps to remove this irrelevant entitlement and tax burden.Dr Simon GibbsReader in educational psychology, Newcastle University |
| • Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com | • Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com |
| • Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters | • Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters |
| Private schools | |
| Schools | |
| Grammar schools | |
| Education policy | |
| Charities | |
| letters | |
| Share on Facebook | |
| Share on Twitter | |
| Share via Email | |
| Share on LinkedIn | |
| Share on Pinterest | |
| Share on Google+ | |
| Share on WhatsApp | |
| Share on Messenger | |
| Reuse this content |