This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/21/world/asia/afghanistan-army-uniform-camouflage.html

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
‘A Dumb Decision’: U.S. Said to Waste $28 Million on Afghan Army Camouflage ‘A Dumb Decision’: U.S. Said to Waste $28 Million on Afghan Army Camouflage
(about 5 hours later)
The United States spent up to $28 million more than it had to on camouflage uniforms for the Afghan National Army because of the sartorial tastes of a single Afghan official, an American government watchdog said on Wednesday.The United States spent up to $28 million more than it had to on camouflage uniforms for the Afghan National Army because of the sartorial tastes of a single Afghan official, an American government watchdog said on Wednesday.
A report by the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction found that the Pentagon needlessly spent millions to license a proprietary camouflage pattern that replicates lush forests. Most of Afghanistan’s landscape, however, is desert, and the Defense Department owns dozens of similar patterns it could have used for free, the report said. A report by the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction found that the Pentagon needlessly spent millions to license a proprietary camouflage pattern that replicates lush forests. Most of Afghanistan’s landscape, however, is desert, and the Defense Department owns dozens of similar patterns it could have used free, the report said.
“They picked the pattern based on a fashion preference, not by experts, but by the minister of defense,” said John F. Sopko, the special inspector general. “That was a dumb decision.”“They picked the pattern based on a fashion preference, not by experts, but by the minister of defense,” said John F. Sopko, the special inspector general. “That was a dumb decision.”
By 2007, six years after the United States and its allies invaded Afghanistan, the ragtag soldiers of the Afghan Army wore a hodgepodge of uniforms. The United States and its allies have spent millions on overhauling and training Afghanistan’s security forces. Purchasing matching uniforms was one expense.By 2007, six years after the United States and its allies invaded Afghanistan, the ragtag soldiers of the Afghan Army wore a hodgepodge of uniforms. The United States and its allies have spent millions on overhauling and training Afghanistan’s security forces. Purchasing matching uniforms was one expense.
Abdul Rahim Wardak, then the minister of defense, discovered the camouflage pattern the Pentagon eventually purchased while browsing uniform styles online, according to unnamed Defense Department officials cited in the report.Abdul Rahim Wardak, then the minister of defense, discovered the camouflage pattern the Pentagon eventually purchased while browsing uniform styles online, according to unnamed Defense Department officials cited in the report.
The forest pattern he settled on was created and owned by HyperStealth Biotechnology Corporation, a Canadian company that has designed camouflage for the militaries of Jordan, Chile and the United Arab Emirates.The forest pattern he settled on was created and owned by HyperStealth Biotechnology Corporation, a Canadian company that has designed camouflage for the militaries of Jordan, Chile and the United Arab Emirates.
The new uniforms also included expensive details like replacing buttons with zippers.The new uniforms also included expensive details like replacing buttons with zippers.
“It’s the totally wrong pattern for a country like Afghanistan. We are in Afghanistan; 98 percent of it is desert,” Mr. Sopko said. “So you would assume you want something that blended with the desert.”“It’s the totally wrong pattern for a country like Afghanistan. We are in Afghanistan; 98 percent of it is desert,” Mr. Sopko said. “So you would assume you want something that blended with the desert.”
The inspector general’s report found that the Pentagon could have chosen from a number of similar patterns that it owned and were not in use by American forces.The inspector general’s report found that the Pentagon could have chosen from a number of similar patterns that it owned and were not in use by American forces.
Afghan special forces and several national police units wear uniforms with a pattern owned by the Department of Defense, according to the report.Afghan special forces and several national police units wear uniforms with a pattern owned by the Department of Defense, according to the report.
Altering the army’s uniforms could save the United States between $68.6 million and $72.2 million over the next 10 years, the report said.Altering the army’s uniforms could save the United States between $68.6 million and $72.2 million over the next 10 years, the report said.
Mr. Sopko said the uniforms were one of many needless costs borne by American taxpayers in Afghanistan.Mr. Sopko said the uniforms were one of many needless costs borne by American taxpayers in Afghanistan.
“This is not a one-off. This is not unique,” Mr. Sopko said. “We have too many contracts like this in Afghanistan, where people make stupid decisions, and people are not held accountable and the taxpayer pays.”“This is not a one-off. This is not unique,” Mr. Sopko said. “We have too many contracts like this in Afghanistan, where people make stupid decisions, and people are not held accountable and the taxpayer pays.”
The Pentagon did not rebut the findings of the report and said it would conduct a review to find a “more effective alternative” to the current uniforms.The Pentagon did not rebut the findings of the report and said it would conduct a review to find a “more effective alternative” to the current uniforms.