This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/jun/22/daily-mail-v-guardian-an-open-minded-readers-view
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| Daily Mail v Guardian – an open-minded reader’s view | Daily Mail v Guardian – an open-minded reader’s view |
| (7 months later) | |
| Letters | |
| Thu 22 Jun 2017 19.23 BST | |
| Last modified on Mon 27 Nov 2017 21.23 GMT | |
| Share on Facebook | |
| Share on Twitter | |
| Share via Email | |
| View more sharing options | |
| Share on LinkedIn | |
| Share on Pinterest | |
| Share on Google+ | |
| Share on WhatsApp | |
| Share on Messenger | |
| Close | |
| Virginia Cumming (Letters, 21 June) implies that millions who read the Daily Mail are complicit in hate speech as they consume “rightwing” extremism by making the choice to read the newspaper, and by implication should therefore be in the same dock as the publisher. Small in number we may be, but I am (probably) one of the few Guardian subscribers who occasionally reads the Mail newspaper, for balance, and with an open mind. Martin Rowson’s Sun and Daily Mail white van cartoon really plumbed the depths of leftwing hatred – and blinkered ignorance – towards the “ordinary” people who choose to read the Mail (and other tabloids) and the Mail has quite rightly responded with both barrels. | Virginia Cumming (Letters, 21 June) implies that millions who read the Daily Mail are complicit in hate speech as they consume “rightwing” extremism by making the choice to read the newspaper, and by implication should therefore be in the same dock as the publisher. Small in number we may be, but I am (probably) one of the few Guardian subscribers who occasionally reads the Mail newspaper, for balance, and with an open mind. Martin Rowson’s Sun and Daily Mail white van cartoon really plumbed the depths of leftwing hatred – and blinkered ignorance – towards the “ordinary” people who choose to read the Mail (and other tabloids) and the Mail has quite rightly responded with both barrels. |
| The exceptional Martin is entitled to draw and castigate as he wishes, and Virginia can huff and puff about the Mail, but it is entitled to its opinions as much as the Guardian, whose snobby metropolitan-left editorials, op-ed articles and letters may offend the many more who read the Mail.Charles FosterChalfont St Peter, Buckinghamshire | The exceptional Martin is entitled to draw and castigate as he wishes, and Virginia can huff and puff about the Mail, but it is entitled to its opinions as much as the Guardian, whose snobby metropolitan-left editorials, op-ed articles and letters may offend the many more who read the Mail.Charles FosterChalfont St Peter, Buckinghamshire |
| • Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com | • Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com |
| • Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters | • Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters |
| Daily Mail | |
| Newspapers & magazines | |
| National newspapers | |
| The Guardian | |
| Newspapers | |
| The far right | |
| letters | |
| Share on Facebook | |
| Share on Twitter | |
| Share via Email | |
| Share on LinkedIn | |
| Share on Pinterest | |
| Share on Google+ | |
| Share on WhatsApp | |
| Share on Messenger | |
| Reuse this content |