This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jun/22/making-a-murderer-brendan-dassey-release-retrial

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Making a Murderer's Brendan Dassey to be re-tried or released, judges rule Making a Murderer's Brendan Dassey to be re-tried or released, judges rule
(25 days later)
Federal appeals panel says confession of Wisconsin prisoner, who was featured in the widely watched documentary, was improperly obtained
Associated Press
Thu 22 Jun 2017 23.37 BST
Last modified on Wed 20 Sep 2017 17.07 BST
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share via Email
View more sharing options
Share on LinkedIn
Share on Pinterest
Share on Google+
Share on WhatsApp
Share on Messenger
Close
The confession of a Wisconsin inmate featured in the Netflix series Making a Murderer was improperly obtained and he should be re-tried or released from prison, a federal appeals panel ruled Thursday.The confession of a Wisconsin inmate featured in the Netflix series Making a Murderer was improperly obtained and he should be re-tried or released from prison, a federal appeals panel ruled Thursday.
Brendan Dassey was sentenced to life in prison in 2007 in photographer Teresa Halbach’s death on Halloween two years earlier. Dassey told detectives he helped his uncle, Steven Avery, rape and kill Halbach in the Avery family’s Manitowoc County salvage yard. Avery was sentenced to life in a separate trial.Brendan Dassey was sentenced to life in prison in 2007 in photographer Teresa Halbach’s death on Halloween two years earlier. Dassey told detectives he helped his uncle, Steven Avery, rape and kill Halbach in the Avery family’s Manitowoc County salvage yard. Avery was sentenced to life in a separate trial.
A federal magistrate judge ruled in August that investigators coerced Dassey, who was 16 years old at the time and suffered from cognitive problems, into confessing and overturned his conviction. The state justice department appealed the ruling to the 7th US circuit court of appeals, a move that kept Dassey, now 27, behind bars pending the outcome.A federal magistrate judge ruled in August that investigators coerced Dassey, who was 16 years old at the time and suffered from cognitive problems, into confessing and overturned his conviction. The state justice department appealed the ruling to the 7th US circuit court of appeals, a move that kept Dassey, now 27, behind bars pending the outcome.
A three-judge panel from the Chicago-based 7th circuit upheld, 2-1, the magistrate’s decision to overturn his conviction.A three-judge panel from the Chicago-based 7th circuit upheld, 2-1, the magistrate’s decision to overturn his conviction.
Johnny Koremenos, a spokesman for Wisconsin attorney general Brad Schimel, said the office expected to seek review by the full 7th circuit or the supreme court, and hoped “that today’s erroneous decision will be reversed”.Johnny Koremenos, a spokesman for Wisconsin attorney general Brad Schimel, said the office expected to seek review by the full 7th circuit or the supreme court, and hoped “that today’s erroneous decision will be reversed”.
“We continue to send our condolences to the Halbach family as they have to suffer through another attempt by Mr Dassey to re-litigate his guilty verdict and sentence,” Koremenos said.“We continue to send our condolences to the Halbach family as they have to suffer through another attempt by Mr Dassey to re-litigate his guilty verdict and sentence,” Koremenos said.
Laura H Nirider, an attorney who aided Dassey’s defense, called it “a victory for Brendan”.Laura H Nirider, an attorney who aided Dassey’s defense, called it “a victory for Brendan”.
The majority opinion written by Judge Ilana Rovner said “no reasonable court” could have any confidence that Dassey’s confession was voluntary. It cited “the leading, the fact-feeding, the false promises, the manipulation of Dassey’s desire to please” as among many factors that cast it in doubt.The majority opinion written by Judge Ilana Rovner said “no reasonable court” could have any confidence that Dassey’s confession was voluntary. It cited “the leading, the fact-feeding, the false promises, the manipulation of Dassey’s desire to please” as among many factors that cast it in doubt.
Judge David Hamilton, in dissent, wrote: “The majority’s decision breaks new ground and poses troubling questions for police and prosecutors. It calls into question standard interrogation techniques that courts have routinely found permissible, even in cases involving juveniles.”Judge David Hamilton, in dissent, wrote: “The majority’s decision breaks new ground and poses troubling questions for police and prosecutors. It calls into question standard interrogation techniques that courts have routinely found permissible, even in cases involving juveniles.”
Avery and Dassey contend they were framed by police angry with Avery for suing Manitowoc County over his wrongful conviction for sexual assault. Avery spent 18 years in prison in that case before DNA tests showed he didn’t commit the crime. He’s pursuing his own appeal in state court.Avery and Dassey contend they were framed by police angry with Avery for suing Manitowoc County over his wrongful conviction for sexual assault. Avery spent 18 years in prison in that case before DNA tests showed he didn’t commit the crime. He’s pursuing his own appeal in state court.
Their cases gained national attention in 2015 after Netflix aired Making a Murderer, a multi-part documentary looking at Halbach’s death, the ensuing investigation and trials. The series sparked widespread conjecture about the pair’s innocence and has garnered them a massive following on social media pushing for their release.Their cases gained national attention in 2015 after Netflix aired Making a Murderer, a multi-part documentary looking at Halbach’s death, the ensuing investigation and trials. The series sparked widespread conjecture about the pair’s innocence and has garnered them a massive following on social media pushing for their release.
Authorities who worked on the cases insisted the documentary is biased. Ken Kratz, the prosecutor, wrote in his book Avery that Dassey was “a shuffling, mumbling young man with bad skin and broken-bowl haircut” who could have saved Halbach’s life but instead involved himself in her rape and murder and Avery is “by any measure of the evidence, stone guilty”.Authorities who worked on the cases insisted the documentary is biased. Ken Kratz, the prosecutor, wrote in his book Avery that Dassey was “a shuffling, mumbling young man with bad skin and broken-bowl haircut” who could have saved Halbach’s life but instead involved himself in her rape and murder and Avery is “by any measure of the evidence, stone guilty”.
WisconsinWisconsin
Making a MurdererMaking a Murderer
US crimeUS crime
US prisonsUS prisons
newsnews
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on Google+Share on Google+
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content