This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/jul/11/contaminated-blood-scandal-theresa-may-orders-inquiry

The article has changed 13 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Contaminated blood scandal: Theresa May orders inquiry Contaminated blood scandal: Theresa May orders inquiry
(about 1 hour later)
The government is to hold a full inquiry into how thousands of people were infected with hepatitis C and HIV following blood transfusions in the 1970s and 1980s, Downing Street has announced. The government is to hold a full inquiry into how thousands of people were infected with hepatitis C and HIV following blood transfusions in the 1970s and 1980s, Downing Street has said.
Theresa May and the health secretary, Jeremy Hunt, told cabinet colleagues on Tuesday that there was a need for an inquiry into what the prime minister called the “contaminated blood scandal”, her spokesman said. The announcement follows years of campaigning by backbench MPs and pressure groups, and came hours before the government faced possible defeat in an emergency motion on the need for an inquiry.
Hunt said the UK-wide inquiry would look into the deaths of 2,400 people which took place before the mass screening for hepatitis C of everyone who donated blood, which only began in 1991. Theresa May and the health secretary, Jeremy Hunt, told cabinet colleagues on Tuesday that an inquiry into what the prime minister called the “contaminated blood scandal” was needed, her spokesman said.
Hunt said the UK-wide inquiry would look into the deaths of 2,400 people before mass screening for hepatitis C of all blood donations, which only began in 1991.
“Jeremy Hunt said that 2,400 people had died and it was necessary to establish the causes of this appalling injustice,” May’s spokesman said.“Jeremy Hunt said that 2,400 people had died and it was necessary to establish the causes of this appalling injustice,” May’s spokesman said.
The announcement came hours before the Commons was due to hold an emergency debate on whether there should be such an inquiry, granted by the Commons Speaker, John Bercow, to Diana Johnson, a Labour MP who has campaigned on the issue. Later on Tuesday the Commons had been due to hold an emergency debate on whether there should be such an inquiry, granted by the Commons Speaker, John Bercow, to Diana Johnson, a Labour MP who has campaigned on the issue.
Given May’s lack of a Commons majority, it seems likely one factor in the timing of the announcement was to avoid a possible defeat in a vote on Johnson’s motion. Given that May lacks a Commons majority, it seems likely one factor in the timing of the announcement was to avoid a possible defeat in a vote on Johnson’s motion.
May’s spokesman said the government would consult with those affected before deciding what form the inquiry could take, the spokesman said, saying it could potentially be a judge-led statutory inquiry, or a Hillsborough-type independent panel.May’s spokesman said the government would consult with those affected before deciding what form the inquiry could take, the spokesman said, saying it could potentially be a judge-led statutory inquiry, or a Hillsborough-type independent panel.
The junior minister Philip Dunne would give further details in parliament later on Tuesday.The junior minister Philip Dunne would give further details in parliament later on Tuesday.
The inquiry would be “wide ranging”, May’s spokesman said, but the details of it would be decided soon. The inquiry would be “wide ranging”, May’s spokesman said, and details would be decided soon.
The government has been under long-term pressure to announce an inquiry into the transfusions with contaminated blood, notably from Johnson and Andy Burnham, the former MP who is now mayor of Greater Manchester. The Labour leader, Jeremy Corbyn, said there was a need for a “broad, public, inquisitive inquiry”.
“Two thousand four hundred people died as a result of this contaminated blood, and it’s caused unbelievable stress to many, many more people,” he said.
“It was obviously a serious systemic failure. I think we need the strongest possible inquiry that can, if necessary, lead to prosecution actions as a result, but above all get to the bottom of it.”
The government has been under long-term pressure to announce an inquiry into the transfusions of contaminated blood, notably from Johnson and Andy Burnham, the former MP who is now mayor of Greater Manchester.
Johnson, the Hull North MP, credited May for having “put party politics aside in the cause of giving people their basic right to answers”.
Those affected and their families needed to be “at the heart” of deciding the terms of reference, Johnson said.
She added: “An inquiry must also ensure that those involved in the scandal provide oral and written evidence, and it must investigate not just the lead-up to this tragedy but the aftermath – including the alleged criminal cover-up and the loss of documents and medical records.”
Many of those infected by the contaminated blood were people with haemophilia, who need regular transfusion of blood products.Many of those infected by the contaminated blood were people with haemophilia, who need regular transfusion of blood products.
In the 1970s and 1980s much of these were imported from the US, where donors were paid, a practice that increased the risk of unsuitable blood. In the 1970s and 1980s, many of these were imported from the US, where donors were paid, a practice that increased the risk of unsuitable blood.
At the time, donors in both the US and UK included inmates in prison, where drug use was an added risk. At the time, donors in both the US and UK included prisoners, where drug use was an added risk.
The government has already set up a compensation scheme for those affected. In March, it was announced that the scheme could be scaled back because of the number of people developing serious health issues, pushing the programme up to £123m over budget. The government has already set up a payout scheme for those affected. In March, it was announced that the scheme could be scaled back because of the number of people developing serious health issues, pushing the programme up to £123m over budget.