This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/jul/14/cheeki-rafiki-company-boss-douglas-innes-convicted-of-failing-to-ensure-yachts-safety

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 4 Version 5
Cheeki Rafiki: company boss convicted of failing to ensure yacht's safety Cheeki Rafiki: company boss convicted of failing to ensure yacht's safety
(about 11 hours later)
Douglas Innes to face retrial over manslaughter of four sailors killed in Atlantic after jury fails to reach verdict
Steven Morris
Fri 14 Jul 2017 13.23 BST
Last modified on Mon 27 Nov 2017 20.11 GMT
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share via Email
View more sharing options
Share on LinkedIn
Share on Pinterest
Share on Google+
Share on WhatsApp
Share on Messenger
Close
A yacht company director has been found guilty of failing to ensure the safety of the Cheeki Rafiki, a boat that was lost in poor weather in the mid Atlantic with four sailors on board.A yacht company director has been found guilty of failing to ensure the safety of the Cheeki Rafiki, a boat that was lost in poor weather in the mid Atlantic with four sailors on board.
Douglas Innes will face a retrial over the deaths of the four men after a jury at Winchester crown court failed to reach verdicts on manslaughter charges.Douglas Innes will face a retrial over the deaths of the four men after a jury at Winchester crown court failed to reach verdicts on manslaughter charges.
Innes, a married father-of-two, showed no emotion as he and his company, Stormforce Coaching, were convicted of failing to operate the yacht in a safe manner, contrary to the Merchant Shipping Act.Innes, a married father-of-two, showed no emotion as he and his company, Stormforce Coaching, were convicted of failing to operate the yacht in a safe manner, contrary to the Merchant Shipping Act.
Cheeki Rafiki set sail from Antigua for Southampton on 4 May 2014. On board were skipper Andrew Bridge, 22, from Farnham in Surrey, and mate James Male, 23, from Southampton. Both were Stormforce Coaching employees.Cheeki Rafiki set sail from Antigua for Southampton on 4 May 2014. On board were skipper Andrew Bridge, 22, from Farnham in Surrey, and mate James Male, 23, from Southampton. Both were Stormforce Coaching employees.
The crew were Steve Warren, 52, and Paul Goslin, 56, friends from Somerset for whom the voyage was a dream trip.The crew were Steve Warren, 52, and Paul Goslin, 56, friends from Somerset for whom the voyage was a dream trip.
Cheeki Rafiki is believed to have lost its keel more than 700 miles from Nova Scotia. An initial search by US authorities was called off but resumed after the British government intervened. The yacht was found but there was no sign of the four men and the lifeboat was still with the boat.Cheeki Rafiki is believed to have lost its keel more than 700 miles from Nova Scotia. An initial search by US authorities was called off but resumed after the British government intervened. The yacht was found but there was no sign of the four men and the lifeboat was still with the boat.
Nigel Lickley QC, prosecuting, told the jury Innes, 42, from Southampton, and his company had been in charge of Cheeki Rafiki, named after a character in the Lion King, for three years.Nigel Lickley QC, prosecuting, told the jury Innes, 42, from Southampton, and his company had been in charge of Cheeki Rafiki, named after a character in the Lion King, for three years.
He claimed the yacht had grounded on three occasions and said bolts holding the three-tonne keel to the hull failed, causing it to fall off during the bad weather during the voyage.He claimed the yacht had grounded on three occasions and said bolts holding the three-tonne keel to the hull failed, causing it to fall off during the bad weather during the voyage.
Lickley also claimed during the trial that the yacht was not appropriately coded – licensed – for the voyage and Innes had chosen an “unsafe” northern route.Lickley also claimed during the trial that the yacht was not appropriately coded – licensed – for the voyage and Innes had chosen an “unsafe” northern route.
The prosecutor said: “The yacht was unsound, broken and unsafe before the four men left Antigua. The yacht had been neglected, not maintained and importantly, because the yacht was used commercially by Mr Innes and his company, not inspected as required.”The prosecutor said: “The yacht was unsound, broken and unsafe before the four men left Antigua. The yacht had been neglected, not maintained and importantly, because the yacht was used commercially by Mr Innes and his company, not inspected as required.”
Innes told the court any fault with the keel had lain hidden and would not necessarily have been found by an inspector, and that he believed the yacht had not required the coding because he did not consider the journey to be a commercial voyage.Innes told the court any fault with the keel had lain hidden and would not necessarily have been found by an inspector, and that he believed the yacht had not required the coding because he did not consider the journey to be a commercial voyage.
He also denied he had cut costs or tried to save time by ordering the yacht back to the UK via the northern route.He also denied he had cut costs or tried to save time by ordering the yacht back to the UK via the northern route.
Trial judge Mr Justice Dingemans discharged the jurors on Friday after they were unable to reach a decision on the four manslaughter allegations, which they had been deliberating over since Tuesday lunchtime.Trial judge Mr Justice Dingemans discharged the jurors on Friday after they were unable to reach a decision on the four manslaughter allegations, which they had been deliberating over since Tuesday lunchtime.
Thanking the jury, Dingemans said: “May I thank you very much for the sacrifices you have made, your prompt attendance and the diligence and care you have taken when considering this matter.”Thanking the jury, Dingemans said: “May I thank you very much for the sacrifices you have made, your prompt attendance and the diligence and care you have taken when considering this matter.”
He released Innes on unconditional bail.He released Innes on unconditional bail.
UK newsUK news
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on Google+Share on Google+
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content