This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jul/26/from-court-fees-to-a-books-ban-chris-grayling-short-lived-justice-policies
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| From court fees to a books ban: Chris Grayling's short-lived justice policies | From court fees to a books ban: Chris Grayling's short-lived justice policies |
| (6 months later) | |
| Employment tribunal fees are the latest in a string of Grayling measures to be quashed or ditched | |
| Jessica Elgot | |
| Wed 26 Jul 2017 15.36 BST | |
| Last modified on Mon 27 Nov 2017 19.29 GMT | |
| Share on Facebook | |
| Share on Twitter | |
| Share via Email | |
| View more sharing options | |
| Share on LinkedIn | |
| Share on Pinterest | |
| Share on Google+ | |
| Share on WhatsApp | |
| Share on Messenger | |
| Close | |
| The supreme court’s ruling that employment tribunal fees unlawfully hindered access to justice is the latest instance of measures introduced by the former justice secretary Chris Grayling being quashed or ditched. | The supreme court’s ruling that employment tribunal fees unlawfully hindered access to justice is the latest instance of measures introduced by the former justice secretary Chris Grayling being quashed or ditched. |
| Criminal court fees | Criminal court fees |
| The charges introduced by Grayling required defendants who pleaded guilty at a magistrates court to pay £150 and those convicted at crown court to hand over £1,200. The then chairman of the Bar Council warned that innocent people were being incentivised to plead guilty. More than 100 magistrates resigned over the charges, including one who paid the charge for a destitute asylum seeker out of his own pocket. Michael Gove scrapped the charges after he replaced Grayling as justice secretary, saying the “intent has fallen short”. | The charges introduced by Grayling required defendants who pleaded guilty at a magistrates court to pay £150 and those convicted at crown court to hand over £1,200. The then chairman of the Bar Council warned that innocent people were being incentivised to plead guilty. More than 100 magistrates resigned over the charges, including one who paid the charge for a destitute asylum seeker out of his own pocket. Michael Gove scrapped the charges after he replaced Grayling as justice secretary, saying the “intent has fallen short”. |
| Selling prison training to Saudi Arabia | Selling prison training to Saudi Arabia |
| Grayling set up Justice Solutions International, a commercial arm of the Ministry of Justice, to sell expertise in prisons and probation, which soon attracted criticism because of its £5.9m contract to provide a training programme for prisons in Saudi Arabia. Jeremy Corbyn called on the government to end the contract, citing the Saudi government’s record on executions and poor human rights. Gove ditched JSI and cancelled the Saudi contract after a fierce dispute with the then foreign secretary, Philip Hammond, with Gove highlighting the human rights concerns. | Grayling set up Justice Solutions International, a commercial arm of the Ministry of Justice, to sell expertise in prisons and probation, which soon attracted criticism because of its £5.9m contract to provide a training programme for prisons in Saudi Arabia. Jeremy Corbyn called on the government to end the contract, citing the Saudi government’s record on executions and poor human rights. Gove ditched JSI and cancelled the Saudi contract after a fierce dispute with the then foreign secretary, Philip Hammond, with Gove highlighting the human rights concerns. |
| Cuts to legal aid for prisoners | Cuts to legal aid for prisoners |
| The court of appeal ruled in April that cuts to legal aid for prisoners were unlawful because they are inherently unfair. The Howard League for Penal Reform, which brought the case against the government, argued that since the cuts had come into force in December 2013, violence and self-injury in prisons had risen to record levels. The court found that important decisions about prisoners could not be made efficiently or fairly in light of the cuts. | The court of appeal ruled in April that cuts to legal aid for prisoners were unlawful because they are inherently unfair. The Howard League for Penal Reform, which brought the case against the government, argued that since the cuts had come into force in December 2013, violence and self-injury in prisons had risen to record levels. The court found that important decisions about prisoners could not be made efficiently or fairly in light of the cuts. |
| Legal aid restrictions for domestic violence victims | Legal aid restrictions for domestic violence victims |
| These widely criticised rules meant abused victims in family court hearings had to demonstrate they had been targeted within the past five years to obtain legal aid. Victims also had to provide proof of abuse, such as medical reports, injunctions and social services records. This year the government removed the five-year limit and said they would now accept letters from charities, solicitors and housing officers as proof of abuse, after it was estimated that 40% of female survivors of domestic violence were unable to meet previous legal aid evidence requirements. | These widely criticised rules meant abused victims in family court hearings had to demonstrate they had been targeted within the past five years to obtain legal aid. Victims also had to provide proof of abuse, such as medical reports, injunctions and social services records. This year the government removed the five-year limit and said they would now accept letters from charities, solicitors and housing officers as proof of abuse, after it was estimated that 40% of female survivors of domestic violence were unable to meet previous legal aid evidence requirements. |
| Banning books for prisoners | Banning books for prisoners |
| One of the most high-profile controversies of Grayling’s tenure was the decision to prevent prisoners from receiving books from friends or relatives, and limit the number of books each prisoners was able to have in a cell. A high court ruling in December 2015 found that restricting prisoners’ access to books was unlawful, and Gove scrapped the rules when he took office. | One of the most high-profile controversies of Grayling’s tenure was the decision to prevent prisoners from receiving books from friends or relatives, and limit the number of books each prisoners was able to have in a cell. A high court ruling in December 2015 found that restricting prisoners’ access to books was unlawful, and Gove scrapped the rules when he took office. |
| Chris Grayling | |
| Prisons and probation | |
| Legal aid | |
| UK criminal justice | |
| news | |
| Share on Facebook | |
| Share on Twitter | |
| Share via Email | |
| Share on LinkedIn | |
| Share on Pinterest | |
| Share on Google+ | |
| Share on WhatsApp | |
| Share on Messenger | |
| Reuse this content |