This article is from the source 'independent' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/charlie-gard-case-decision-hospice-parents-latest-news-justice-francis-a7861716.html

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
Charlie Gard case: Judge to order child moved to hospice if agreement over final days cannot be reached Charlie Gard case: Judge to order child moved to hospice if agreement over final days cannot be reached
(about 1 hour later)
Charlie Gard's parents have been given until 12pm on Thursday to agree a plan for his final days.Charlie Gard's parents have been given until 12pm on Thursday to agree a plan for his final days.
If they cannot agree with Great Ormond Street (GOSH) medics on how the 11-month-old should be cared for before his death, the judge in the case will order him moved to a hospice and his ventilator removed. If they cannot agree with Great Ormond Street (GOSH) medics on how the 11-month-old should be cared for before his death, the judge in the case will order him moved to a hospice and his ventilator removed.
Mr Justice Francis held a private discussion with Charlie's mother, Connie Yates, late on Wednesday, it was reported. Mr Justice Francis held a private discussion with Charlie's mother, Connie Yates, late on Wednesday, it was reported, as the tragic case neared its conclusion.
Both Charlie's parents and his doctors have agreed he should move to a hospice, the High Court heard. But they disagreed over the detail of care plans. Both Charlie's parents and his doctors have agreed he should move to a hospice, the High Court heard. But they disagreed over the detail of care plans.
Ms Yates and Chris Gard had initially wanted Charlie to spend his last days at home with them, but GOSH opposed the move due to the complexity of his life-support system.Ms Yates and Chris Gard had initially wanted Charlie to spend his last days at home with them, but GOSH opposed the move due to the complexity of his life-support system.
Nurses from GOSH and a specialist doctor have volunteered to care for Charlie in a hospice, the court was told. Ms Yates walked out of what could be the final court hearing in Charlie's case on Wednesday, after the judge said a decision had to be made.
She yelled: "I hope you are happy with yourselves."
Grant Armstrong, who led Charlie's parents' legal team, said the couple wanted to privately fund care at a hospice where Charlie could continue to receive life-support treatment for days before being allowed to die.
He said a doctor was ready to help and several Great Ormond Street nurses had volunteered their services.
Great Ormond Street bosses said they were not satisfied that a properly-qualified specialist would be in control under Charlie's parents' plan.
A lawyer in the couple's legal team said discussions about mounting an appeal against Mr Justice Francis's decision not to allow more time were taking place.
A family friend posted a statement on Facebook saying: "The reality is Charlie is very stable, not in pain and rarely needs a doctor. It is therefore difficult to understand why Charlie could not die at home.
"All he needs is a ventilator which pumps room air into his lungs. It is extraordinarily sad that there's been so much fuss about him dying at home.
"Connie and Chris have conceded a hospice but it was not their first choice. They will be devastated they have not been granted their final wishes as parents."
Additional reporting by agencies