This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-40745988

The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 3 Version 4
Charlie Gard hospice move approved Charlie Gard parents 'denied final wish' to spend longer with son
(35 minutes later)
Terminally-ill Charlie Gard will be moved to a hospice and have his life support withdrawn soon after, a High Court judge has said. Terminally-ill Charlie Gard will be moved to a hospice and have his life support withdrawn soon after, a High Court judge has decided.
Charlie's parents wanted a private medical team to care for their son in a hospice so they could have more time with him. Great Ormond Street Hospital (GOSH) said it was not in his best interests to spend a long time in a hospice.
But Great Ormond Street Hospital (GOSH) said it was not in his best interests. His parents wanted a private team to care for Charlie so they could have more time with him. "Gosh have denied us our final wish," his mother said.
Mr Justice Francis approved a plan which will see Charlie "inevitably" die shortly after being moved. The judge approved a plan that will see Charlie die shortly after being moved.
The judge added that no details about when he would be moved and where could be made public. Mr Justice Francis added that no details about when Charlie would be moved and where could be made public.
The story of Charlie GardThe story of Charlie Gard
'Final wish'
Parents, Connie Yates and Chris Gard, and GOSH had until 12:00 BST to agree Charlie's end-of-life care. However, an agreement was not reached by the noon deadline.Parents, Connie Yates and Chris Gard, and GOSH had until 12:00 BST to agree Charlie's end-of-life care. However, an agreement was not reached by the noon deadline.
The parents' lawyer, Grant Armstrong said they wanted to spend days with Charlie at a hospice before his death.The parents' lawyer, Grant Armstrong said they wanted to spend days with Charlie at a hospice before his death.
But hospital bosses said they could not agree to the arrangement as his parents had not found a hospice or a paediatric intensive care specialist.But hospital bosses said they could not agree to the arrangement as his parents had not found a hospice or a paediatric intensive care specialist.
Commenting on the decision, Charlie's mum, Connie said: "We just want some peace with our son, no hospital, no lawyer's, no courts, no media just quality time with Charlie away from everything, to say goodbye to him in the most loving way.
"Most people won't ever have to go through what we have been through, we've had no control over our son's life and no control over our son's death.
"Despite us and our legal team working tirelessly to arrange this near impossible task the judge has ordered against what we arranged and has agreed to what GOSH asked.
"This subsequently gives us very little time with our son."
The High Court order says Charlie will continue to be treated in hospital for a "period" of time before being moved to the hospice, which cannot be named for legal reasons.The High Court order says Charlie will continue to be treated in hospital for a "period" of time before being moved to the hospice, which cannot be named for legal reasons.
It says doctors can then withdraw "artificial ventilation" after a period of time.It says doctors can then withdraw "artificial ventilation" after a period of time.
Everyone involved has agreed that the "arrangements" will "inevitably result in Charlie's death within a short period thereafter", the order adds.Everyone involved has agreed that the "arrangements" will "inevitably result in Charlie's death within a short period thereafter", the order adds.
GOSH said it deeply regretted "that profound and heartfelt differences between" Charlie's doctors and parents "have had to be played out in court over such a protracted period".GOSH said it deeply regretted "that profound and heartfelt differences between" Charlie's doctors and parents "have had to be played out in court over such a protracted period".
Timeline of Charlie's caseTimeline of Charlie's case