This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/aug/16/uk-to-seek-irish-border-waivers-on-customs-and-food-safety-after-brexit

The article has changed 13 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
UK to seek Irish border waivers on customs and food safety after Brexit UK to seek Irish border waivers on customs and food safety after Brexit
(about 1 hour later)
Britain will seek a series of waivers for goods and people crossing the Northern Ireland border under new plans that risk creating a “backdoor” with the European Union after Brexit.Britain will seek a series of waivers for goods and people crossing the Northern Ireland border under new plans that risk creating a “backdoor” with the European Union after Brexit.
The government aims to avoid the need for border posts with Ireland when the UK leaves the EU, an ambitious goal seen as essential to preserving the Good Friday peace agreement.The government aims to avoid the need for border posts with Ireland when the UK leaves the EU, an ambitious goal seen as essential to preserving the Good Friday peace agreement.
Details of the plan Whitehall officials unveiled on Wednesday have, however, sparked a series of difficult questions about what the knock-on impact of having no border might be for wider EU-UK relations. Details of the plan Whitehall officials unveiled on Wednesday have, however, sparked a series of difficult questions about what the knock-on impact of having no border may be for wider EU-UK relations.
When Brexit talks resume in two weeks, Britain will ask for an exemption for all small traders and farmers from a host of customs, agricultural and food safety checks. In return, it aims to seek “regulatory equivalence” with the EU to try to avoid the need for inspections of live animals and billions of pounds worth of other goods crossing back and forth. Ireland’s new taoiseach, Leo Varadkar, has been much more sceptical than the UK about the potential for avoiding border posts via virtual checks on importers. Whilst agreeing with British ministers and EU negotiators that it is inconceivable for there to be a return to a hard border with the north, Dublin argues that the best way for the UK to achieve this would be by permanently remaining in a customs union with the EU and seeking single market membership like Norway through the European Economic Area. The UK has conceded that some of this will be necessary in its interim phase after Brexit, but hopes clever technological solutions can allow it have looser economic links in the long run. Varadkar is not alone in being sceptical about whether such a cake-and-eat-it customs and trade strategy is viable.
Officials refused to speculate what consequences this might have for limiting the scope of trade agreements with non-compliant countries such as the US. Without matching regulations, the EU could block imports however, fearing that the open border is a backdoor into its consumer market. There was a cautious welcome from the Irish government, which called the document timely and helpful. The European commission welcomed the UK’s position papers “as a positive step towards really starting phase one of the negotiations. The clock is ticking and these will allow us to make progress.”
Similar fears of a backdoor in the labour market were put to officials when they revealed that there would be nothing to stop EU economic migrants traveling through the Republic of Ireland into the UK under a continuation of the common travel area scheme. The government believes it can limit the impact of any such undocumented immigration through tighter checks on work permits in the UK. When Brexit talks resume in two weeks, Britain will ask for an exemption for all small traders and farmers from a host of customs, agricultural and food safety checks. In return, it aims to seek “regulatory equivalence” with the EU to try to avoid the need for inspections of live animals and billions of pounds worth of other goods.
Officials concede the plan relies on unprecedented trust and co-operation with the EU but say it is worth it to maintain peace and prosperity in Northern Ireland. Officials refuse to speculate what consequences this may have for limiting the scope of trade agreements with non-compliant countries such as the US. Without matching regulations, the EU could block imports however, fearing that the open border was a backdoor into its consumer market.
“The UK and Ireland have been clear all along that we need to prioritise protecting the Belfast agreement in these negotiations, and ensure the land border is as seamless as possible for people and businesses,” said the Brexit secretary, David Davis. Similar fears of a backdoor in the labour market were put to officials when they revealed there would be nothing to stop EU economic migrants travelling through the Republic of Ireland and into the UK under a continuation of the common travel area scheme. The government believes it can limit the impact of any such undocumented immigration through tighter checks on UK work permits.
Officials concede the plan relies on unprecedented trust and cooperation with the EU, but say it is worth it to maintain peace and prosperity in Northern Ireland.
“The UK and Ireland have been clear all along that we need to prioritise protecting the Belfast agreement in these negotiations, and ensure the land border is as seamless as possible for people and businesses,” said David Davis, the UK’s Brexit secretary.
The Irish government said it would analyse the UK’s latest paper in detail, describing it as timely and helpful. “The emphasis on the priority areas identified by the government, including the common travel area, the Good Friday agreement, north-south cooperation and avoiding a hard border, is welcome. Protecting the peace process is crucial and it must not become a bargaining chip in the negotiations,” it said.
Simon Coveney, the Irish foreign minister, welcomed the document’s clarity, but said the arrangements on customs facilitation would be difficult, given the UK’s proposals to negotiate separate free trade agreements at the same time.Simon Coveney, the Irish foreign minister, welcomed the document’s clarity, but said the arrangements on customs facilitation would be difficult, given the UK’s proposals to negotiate separate free trade agreements at the same time.
Perhaps the hardest negotiating issue in Brussels and Dublin will be UK proposals to exempt Northern Ireland food producers from phytosanitary checks, which are currently in place to ensure animal welfare and consumer health standards are maintained for any imports into the EU single market. Perhaps the toughest negotiating issue in Brussels and Dublin will be UK proposals to exempt Northern Ireland’s food producers from sanitary and phytosanitary checks in place to ensure animal welfare and consumer health standards are maintained for any imports into the EU single market.
“We think if we can reach a deep enough equivalence arrangement with the EU it is possible to do that via processes that don’t involve the land border,” said one government official briefing journalists on the plan. “We believe we have got a strong track record on food safety. We think this can be done in a way that doesn’t introduce food safety and veterinary risks into the system.”“We think if we can reach a deep enough equivalence arrangement with the EU it is possible to do that via processes that don’t involve the land border,” said one government official briefing journalists on the plan. “We believe we have got a strong track record on food safety. We think this can be done in a way that doesn’t introduce food safety and veterinary risks into the system.”
However Britain will have to tread a fine line between satisfying European import concerns and not effectively ceding all control over food and agriculture regulation to Brussels, or preventing any trade deals with third-party countries that might want exemptions on, for example, genetically modified crops or hormone-treated beef. Britain will have to tread a fine line between satisfying European import concerns and not ceding all control over food and agriculture regulation to Brussels, or preventing any trade deals with third-party countries that may want exemptions on products such as genetically modified crops or hormone-treated beef.
The UK is likely to argue that for the purposes of health checks as well as customs tariffs much of the trade across the border is effectively local trade, not international trade, and should be exempted from controls that exist elsewhere in the EU in order to maintain borderless travel. The UK is expected to argue that for the purposes of health checks and customs tariffs much of the trade across the border is effectively local trade, not international trade, and should be exempted from controls that exist elsewhere in the EU in order to maintain borderless travel.
However, concerns have also been raised about the implications of allowing people to continue to travel without any checks, and whether this outsources UK immigration policy to the Irish Republic. Concerns have also been raised about the implications of allowing people to continue to travel without any checks, and whether this outsources UK immigration policy to the Irish Republic.
The UK government says that maintaining the common travel area should be possible because security and immigration checks are often carried out far away from the border already. However it concedes that the plan relies on Ireland staying outside the Schengen travel zone. The UK government says that maintaining the common travel area should be possible because security and immigration checks are often carried out far away from the border already. It concedes, however, that the plan relies on Ireland staying outside the Schengen travel zone.
“Controls we introduce away from the physical border allow you to complete the required checks,” said the Whitehall official. “People can still be picked up for security purposes.”“Controls we introduce away from the physical border allow you to complete the required checks,” said the Whitehall official. “People can still be picked up for security purposes.”
However, this has sparked fears of an increase in electronic tracking that could see physical border security and watchtowers simply replaced with an increase in virtual surveillance instead. This has sparked fears of an increase in electronic tracking, whereby electronic surveillance is used instead of physical border security.
“Using untested technology to police the border won’t instil a great deal of confidence,” said William Foster, a partner at the immigration law firm Fragomen. “The biggest question for businesses is what will this mean day to day? Will people be tracked when they drive from Belfast to Galway? Will software be used to log their movements?”“Using untested technology to police the border won’t instil a great deal of confidence,” said William Foster, a partner at the immigration law firm Fragomen. “The biggest question for businesses is what will this mean day to day? Will people be tracked when they drive from Belfast to Galway? Will software be used to log their movements?”
UK officials said they did not recognise such surveillance fears and insisted there would be no increase in number plate recognition cameras at the border. UK officials said they did not recognise such fears and said there would be no increase in number plate recognition cameras at the border.
The Northern Ireland secretary, James Brokenshire, said goodwill between London and Dublin governments should help find an acceptable solution. “It is clear that there are many areas where the UK, Ireland and the rest of the EU have shared objectives,” he said. “We have a lot to build on but need to work together intensively over the coming months.” The Northern Ireland secretary, James Brokenshire, said goodwill between the governments in London and Dublin should help find an acceptable solution. “It is clear that there are many areas where the UK, Ireland and the rest of the EU have shared objectives,” he said. “We have a lot to build on but need to work together intensively over the coming months.”
The British Irish Chamber of Commerce said it was relieved that the UK was still committed to “borderless trade on the island of Ireland”. The British Irish Chamber of Commerce said it was relieved the UK was still committed to borderless trade on the island of Ireland.
In Dublin, John McGrane, director general of the chamber said the retention of the pre-EU common travel area between the UK and Ireland would have “huge benefits for the thousands of border workers who travel from one jurisdiction to the other on a daily basis”. John McGrane, the chamber’s director general, said the retention of the pre-EU common travel area between the UK and Ireland would have “huge benefits for the thousands of border workers who travel from one jurisdiction to the other on a daily basis”.
But the cross-community, pro-European Alliance party in Northern Ireland said that while the government may wish for a frictionless border any differences in customs and tariff regimes between the UK and the EU would cause problems. The cross-community, pro-European Alliance party in Northern Ireland said that the government may wish for a frictionless border, but any differences in customs and tariff regimes between the UK and the EU would cause problems.
Stephen Farry, Alliance’s acting leader in the Stormont assembly, said such differences “would require both a heavy administrative burden and some form of physical checks. Even light touch borders such as between Norway and Sweden have a physical frontier.” Stephen Farry, Alliance’s acting leader in the Stormont assembly, said such differences “would require both a heavy administrative burden and some form of physical checks. Even light touch borders such as between Norway and Sweden have a physical frontier”.
He said the government was being “over-optimistic” in its insistence that new technology could avoid the need for border checks on goods flowing across the Irish frontier post-Brexit. He said the British government was being over-optimistic in its insistence that new technology could avoid the need for border checks on goods flowing across the Irish frontier post-Brexit.
Need something explained?Let us know which of these questions we can answer for you. Brussels has said it wants to see “sufficient progress” on a deal on the Irish border in first phase of Brexit negotiations, before talks are allowed to progress to future trade ties. The UK has contended that the timetable is artificial, because any agreement on the Irish border will be linked to future customs rules. In reality, the EU may look for a political agreement on the Irish border, which is less detailed in the short-term than the divorce settlement it is seeking on money and citizens’ rights.
A European commission spokeswoman referred to previous statements from the EU’s chief negotiator. “We would reiterate what Michel Barnier has said before. We must discuss how to maintain the common travel area and protect in all its dimensions the Good Friday agreement of which the United Kingdom is a co-guarantor. It is essential that we have a political discussion on this before looking at technical solutions,” she said.